Published November 21, 2022 | Version v1
Poster Open

A change in the relationship between chromospheric activity and the large-scale magnetic field for G stars on the main sequence

  • 1. University of Southern Queensland
  • 2. Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Göttingen, Germany
  • 3. Université de Montpellier, CNRS
  • 4. University of Vienna
  • 5. Université de Toulouse, CNRS
  • 6. University of St Andrews
  • 7. European Space Agency; University of Exeter
  • 8. Trinity College Dublin; Leiden University
  • 9. University of Göttingen; CERN, Switzerland

Description

The internal magnetic fields of cool stars are known to power activity in stellar chromospheres, but there is still much to discover about the relationship between the large-scale magnetic field and chromospheric activity. We have revisited this relationship by surveying the chromospheric activity (logR'HK) and surface-averaged longitudinal magnetic field strength (Bl) for 954 mid-F to mid-M dwarf stars using observations from 3 the PolarBase spectropolarimetric database. We computed the mean logR'HK, mean Bl and their variability amplitudes from time-series observations, and found that for F, K and M stars, the mean logR'HK declines fairly smoothly with the mean logBl and also the amplitude of logR'HK variability. Meanwhile, for G stars on the main sequence, chromospheric activity appears to drop from logR'HK ~ -4.4 to -4.8, with minimal change in the logBl and the amplitude of logR'HK variability. At a similar logR'HK level, we also see a switch from mixed magnetic field geometries to dominantly poloidal magnetic field geometries, as shown by published large-scale magnetic field maps derived using Zeeman Doppler Imaging. These results support a change in the magnetic surface properties of G stars that occurs on the main sequence.

Files

CoolStars21_poster.pdf

Files (900.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:dd768417577b5a1553225f5aad551f94
900.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is derived from
10.1093/mnras/stac1291 (DOI)

References

  • Vaughan et al. (1978), PASP, 90, 267
  • Noyes et al. (1984), ApJ, 279, 763
  • Marsden et al. (2014), MNRAS, 444, 3517
  • Suarez Mascareno et al. (2015), MNRAS, 452, 2745
  • Donati et al. (1997), MNRAS, 291, 658