Self-assessment of students' strengths and difficulties at work in the innovative program
- 1. The Second English Language High School "Thomas Jefferson" (Sofia)
- 2. Institute for Research and Training of Doctoral Students "Paisiy Hilendarski" (Sofia)
- 3. Sofiyska Matematicheska Gimnasiya "Paisiy Hilendarski" (Sofia)
- 4. Researcher
Description
This article presents the results of an analysis of data from a survey “Which are your strengths and weaknesses”. The target group of 956 students were engaged in an extensive survey, aged from 10 to 18. The survey conducted a self-assessment of their strengths and weaknesses in the context of their level of thriving in and outside the innovative program. The study aims to compare the overall psychological condition and the level of students’ motivation who participate in an innovative program for specialized training with a control sample of students who are not engaged in innovative educational initiatives. In the methodological core of research design are implemented indicators that are calculated based on the results of two measures; The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, which measures four difficulties domains of both psychological and educational development challenges, and the fifth domain referring to pro-social behaviour; and Brief Inventory of Thriving, a short scale for self-assessment of overall life satisfaction and achievement level. The target group of 956 students were engaged in an extensive survey, aged from 10 to 18. The survey conducted a self-assessment of their strengths and weaknesses in the context of their level of thriving in and outside the innovative program. The relevance of the results obtained from the pilot study is both to re-validate the methodology and to confirm or reject several hypotheses directly related to the educational impact and the personal contribution to the motivation of the participants in the innovative program.
Files
ped2021-01-005.pdf
Files
(272.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:13c773429cb5cef1645ffde668d87558
|
272.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (2007). NEO PI-R: Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Sofia: OS Bulgaria. (in Bulgarian)
- Ferdinandov, K. (2020). High-School Juniors and Seniors' Affective Balance, Coping and Thriving before and During the First Covid-19 Lockdown. Scientific Proceedings from the 9th National Congress of Psychology. November 13-15, 2020. (in Bulgarian)
- Giannakopoulos, G., Tzavara, Ch., Dimitrakaki, Ch., Kolaitis, G., Rotsika, V., & Tountas, Y. (2009). The factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Greek adolescents. Annuals of General Psychiatry, August 26, 2009. BioMed Central Ltd.
- Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 38, 5, 581-586.
- Marzocchi, G.M., Capron, C., Di, P.M., Duran, T.E., Duyme, M., Frigerio, A., Gaspar, M.F., & Thérond, C. (2004). The Use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Southern European countries. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 40-6.
- Niclasen, J., Skovgaard, A.M., Andersen, A.-M.N., Sømhovd, M.J., & Obel, C. (2013). A Confirmatory Approach to Examining the Factor Structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): A Large Scale Cohort Study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology: an Official Publication of the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 3(41), 355-365.
- Petkov, G., Mitevska-Encheva, M., Lazarova, E., & Radeva, P. (2019). Leadership Styles In The Innovative Educational Area. The Macrotheme Review, 8 (1), 1-9.
- Shojaei, T., Wazana, A., Pitrou, I., & Kovess, V. (2009). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a validation study in French school-aged children and cross-cultural comparisons. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 9(44), 740-747.
- Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2015). The Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology Health and Well Being, 6, 3, 251-279.