Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published October 12, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Integrated taxonomy supports the identification of some species of Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Georgia

Creators

  • 1. CBGP, Montpellier SupAgro, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France, Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France.
  • 2. CBGP, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France, Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France.
  • 3. CBGP, IRD, INRAE, CIRAD, Montpellier SupAgro, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France, Campus Internation-al de Baillarguet, CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France.
  • 4. Institute of Zoology, Ilia State University, Kakutsa Cholokashvilli Ave 3/5, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia. & Institute of Entomology, Agricultural University of Georgia, Kakha Bendukidze Campus, 240 David Aghamashenebeli Alley, Tbilisi 0131, Georgia. & CBGP, Montpellier SupAgro, INRAE, CIRAD, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France, Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France.

Description

Tixier, Marie-Stephane, Auger, Philippe, Migeon, Alain, Douin, Martial, Fossoud, Amandine, Navajas, Maria, Arabuli, Tea (2021): Integrated taxonomy supports the identification of some species of Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Georgia. Acarologia 61 (4): 824-844, DOI: 10.24349/m2Rp-WodG, URL: https://www1.montpellier.inrae.fr/CBGP/acarologia/article.php?id=4471

Files

source.pdf

Files (1.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1e632509aa3208e96da730ab103d90ba
1.1 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:1E632509AA32FFE9FFA7FFAB103DFFBA
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/1E632509AA32FFE9FFA7FFAB103DFFBA

Cites
Publication: 10.1007/BF02372991 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10493-018-0308-1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.4039/Ent8826-1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.4039/entm9112fv (DOI)
Publication: 10.1139/z84-272 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647959008683857 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647959108683906 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/cla.12166 (DOI)
Publication: 10.12782/specdiv.3.25 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647954.2011.558851 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11158/saa.23.5.8 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647954.2014.985712 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00056-7 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11158/saa.18.2 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01516.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.24349/acarologia/20184275 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1046/j.1472-8206.2002.02034.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.24349/acarologia/20214428 (DOI)
Publication: 10.24349/acarologia/20204361 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1051/acarologia/20162254 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/molbev/msy096 (DOI)
Publication: 10.4039/entm9747fv (DOI)
Publication: 10.1080/01647958408683347 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11158/saa.18.4.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01717.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.5962/bhl.part.1128 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1016/j.aspen.2020.07.021 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3733/hilg.v33n07p205 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10493-021-00648-w (DOI)
Publication: 10.3906/zoo-0902-23 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/BF03158314 (DOI)
Publication: 10.4039/Ent110859-8 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3733/hilg.v34n07p191 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/BF02980341 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1093/molbev/mst197 (DOI)
Publication: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00192 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.4067.5.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1071/IS07052 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10531-008-9517-y (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.4604.2.2 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1017/S0007485309990617 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1051/acarologia/20101984 (DOI)
Publication: 10.24349/acarologia/20174168 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00937.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s10531-012-0235-0 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2011.00504.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.24349/acarologia/20204396 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00809.x (DOI)
Has part
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA31FFECFE4CFD831359FC0A (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA37FFEEFE4CFC721519FC34 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA35FFEEFE4CFC1D1593F8F5 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA35FFE1FE4CF8D31409F855 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA3BFFE0FE4CFF481358F847 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA38FFE2FE4CFF48133BFBC5 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA39FFE4FE4CFB0314DBFB80 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA3FFFE4FE4CFBC812FFF8F5 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA3FFFE6FE4CF8D314CCF9A4 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA3DFFF9FE4CF9ED13A8FB5D (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/E25A5D71AA22FFF8FE4CFAA41336FC34 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7159734 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.7159740 (DOI)

References

  • Abbasova E. D. 1972. Phytoseiid mites (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) of Azerbaijan. Avtoreferat Dissertatsii na Soiskanie Uchenoy Stepeni Kandidata Biologicheskikh Nauk. Akadrmiya Nauk Azerbaydzhanskoy SSR, Institut Zoologii, Baku, Azerbaijan, 34 pp.
  • Amitai S., Swirski E. 1981. A new species of Amblyseius(Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from the Far East. Isr. J. Entomol., 15: 59-66.
  • Arutunjan E.S. 1970. Phytoseiid mites (Phytoseiidae) on agricultural crops in the Armenian SSR. Akademii Nauk Armyanskoi SSR, Otdelenie Biologicheskikh Nauk, Dissertatsii na Soiskanie
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1958. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina: Gamasina) d'Algerie. II. Phytoseiidae.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1959. Acariens planticoles d'Algerie. I. 5e contribution au genre Amblyseius Berlese (Phytoseiidae). II. Premiere liste d'Actinochitinosi (Cheyletidae, Caligonellidae, Hemisarcoptidae). Bull. Acad. Roy. Belgique, Sciences (Ser. 5), 45: 130-153.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1960. Nouveaux Amblyseius d'Algerie (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 2: 288-299.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1975. Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini. II. Le releve organotaxique de la face dorsale adulte (Gamasides protoadeniques, Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 17(1): 20-29.
  • Athias-Henriot C. 1977. Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini. III. Sur le genre Cydnodromus: Redefinition, composition (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga, 22: 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02372991
  • Barbosa Lima D., Rezende-Puker D., Santos de Mendonca R., Tixier M.-S., Guedes Correia Gondim Junior M., Wagner da Silva Melo J., Chiaradia Oliveira D., Navia D. 2018. Molecular and morphological characterization of the predatory mite Amblyseius largoensis(Acari: Phytoseiidae). Surprising similarity between an Asian and American populations. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 76: 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-018-0308-1
  • Beglyarov G.A. 1958. Species of Phytoseiidae (Parasititormes: Gamasoidea) predatory upon tetranychid mites in orchards of the Krasnodar region. Trudy Vsesoiuznogo Institut Zashchity Rastenii, Leningrad, Russia, 10: 98-124.
  • Chant D.A. 1956. Some mites of the subfamily Phytoseiinae (Acarina: Laelaptidae) from southeastern England, with descriptions of new species. Can. Entomol., 88: 26-37. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent8826-1
  • Chant D.A. 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic review of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of thirty-eight new species. Can. Entomol., 61(12): 1-166. https://doi.org/10.4039/entm9112fv
  • Chant D.A., Yoshida-Shaul E. 1984. A world review of the occidentalis species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool., 62: 1860-1871. https://doi.org/10.1139/ z84-272
  • Chant D.A., Yoshida Shaul E. 1990. The identities of Amblyseius andersoni(Chant) and A. potentillae (Garman) in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Int. J. Acarol., 16(1): 5-12. https: //doi.org/10.1080/01647959008683857
  • Chant D.A., Yoshida-Shaul E. 1991. Adult ventral setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). Int. J. Acarol., 17: 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647959108683906
  • Chant D.A., McMurtry J.A. 2004. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae):
  • Chant D.A., McMurtry J.A. 2007. Illustrated keys and diagnoses for the genera and sub-genera of the Phytoseiidae of the World. Indira Publishing House, 220 pp.
  • Cunliffe F., Baker E.W. 1953. A guide to the predatory phytoseiid mites of the United States. Pinellas Biology Laboratory, Inc., 1, 28 pp.
  • De Leon D. 1959. Two new genera of Phytoseiid mites with notes on Proprioseius meridionalis Chant (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Entomol. News, 70: 257-262.
  • Demite P.R., Moraes G.J. de, McMurtry J.A., Denmark H.A., Castilho R.C. 2021. Phytoseiidae Database. Available from: www.lea.esalq.usp.br/phytoseiidae (accessed 20/XII/2020)
  • Denmark H.A. 1966. Revision of the genus Phytoseius Ribaga, 1904 (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Fla. Dep. Agric. Bul., 6: 1-105.
  • Denmark H.A., Welbourn W.C. 2002. Revision of the genera Amblydromella Muma and Anthoseius De
  • Dos Santos V., Tixier M.-S. 2017. Molecular markers for analysing phylogenetic relationships within the mite family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Cladistics 28(5): 1-16.https://doi.org/10.1111/cla. 12166
  • Duso C., Fontana P. 2002. On the identity of Phytoseius plumifer (Canestrini & Fanzago, 1876) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 42 (2) : 127-136.
  • Ehara S., Amano H. 1998. A revision of the mite family Phytoseiidae in Japan (Acari: Gamasina), with remarks on its biology. Species Divers., 3(1): 25-73. https://doi.org/10.12782/specdiv.3.25
  • Ehara S., Okada Y., Kato H. 1994. Contribution to the knowledge of the mite family Phytoseiidae in
  • Faraji F., Cobanoglu S., Cakmak I. 2011. A checklist and a key for the Phytoseiidae species of turkey with two new species records (Acari: Mesostigmata). Int. J. Acarol., 37 (suppl. 1): 221-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954.2011.558851
  • Ferragut, F., Escudero, A. 1997. Taxonomy and distribution of predatory mites belonging to the genus Euseius Wainstein 1962, in Spain (Acari, Phytoseiidae). Bol. San. Veg. Plagas, 23(2): 227-235.
  • Ferragut F. 2018. New records of phytoseiid mites of the subfamilies Typhlodrominae and Phytoseiinae (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Spain, with description of a new species and re-description of four species of Typhlodromus Scheuten. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 23(5): 883-910. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.5.8
  • Gomelauri L.A. 1968. Three new species of mites of the family Phytoseiidae in southern Georgia [in Russian]. Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the Georgian SSR, Zoology and Parasitology, 52(2): 515-520.
  • Hajizadeh J., Mortazavi S. 2015. The genus Euseius Wainstein (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Iran, with a revised key to Iranian phytoseiid mites. Int. J. Acarol., 41 (1) : 53-66.https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954. 2014.985712
  • Jeyaprakash A., Hoy M.A. 2002. Mitochondrial 12S rRNA sequences used to design a molecular ladder assay to identify six commercially available phytoseiids (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biol. Control, 25: 136-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00056-7
  • Ji J., Lin T., Zhang Y., Lin J., Li L., Chen X. 2013. A comparison between Amblyseius(Typhlodromips) swirskii and Amblyseius eharai with Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) as prey: developmental duration, life table and predation. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 18(2): 123-129.https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.18.2.
  • Kanouh, M., Tixier, M.-S., Guichou, S., Cheval, B. & Kreiter, S. 2010. Two synonymy cases within the genus Neoseiulella (Acari: Phytoseiidae): is the molecular evidence so evident? Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 101: 323-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01516.x
  • Karg W. 1971. Acari (Acarina), Milben, Unterordnung Anactinochaeta (Parasitiformes): Die freilebenden Gamasina (Gamasides), Raubmilben. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden Meeresteile, 59. Teil, VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, 475 pp.
  • Karg W. 1991. Die Raubmilbenarten der Phytoseiidae Berlese (Acarina) Mitteleuropas sowie angrenzen- der Gebiete. Zool. Jahrb. Syst., 118(1): 1-64.
  • Knapp M., Van Houten, Y., Van Baala E., Groot T. 2018. Use of predatory mites in commercial biocontrol: current status and future prospects. Acarologia 58(Suppl): 72-82. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/ 20184275
  • Kazak C., Yildiz S., Sekeroglu E. 2002. Biological characteristics and life tables of Neoseiulus umbraticus Chant (Acari, Phytoseiidae) at three constant temperatures. J. Pest Sci., 75: 118-121. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-8206.2002.02034.x
  • Kolodochka L.A. 1978. Manual for the identification of plant-inhabiting phytoseiid mites. Akademii
  • Kolodochka L.A. 2006. Phytoseiid mites of the Palaearctic Region (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae): faunistic, taxonomy, ecomorphology, evolution. Vest. Zool., suppl. 21, 250pp.
  • Kreiter S., Douin M., Tixier M.-S. 2021. New records of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Madeira Island. Acarologia 61 (2): 217-240.https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20214428
  • Kreiter S., Payet R.-M., Douin M., Fontaine O., Fillatre J., Lebellec F. 2020. Phytoseiidae of La Reunion Island (Acari: Mesostigmata): three new species and two males described, new synonymies, and new records. Acarologia, 60(1) : 111-195.https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20204361
  • Kreiter S., Dos Santos Vicente V., Tixier M.-S., Fontaine O. 2016. An unexpected occurrence of Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot in La Reunion Island (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia, 56(2): 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20162254
  • Kulikova L. 2011. Mites of fruit plantations of the Republic of Moldova. Muzeul Olteniei Craiova.
  • Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol., 35: 1547-1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/ msy096
  • Lindquist E., Evans G.W. 1965. Taxonomic concepts in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the idiosoma of the Gamasina Acarina: Mesostigmata. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Canada, 47, 1-64. https://doi.org/10.4039/entm9747fv
  • McGregor E.A. 1954. Two new mites in the genus Typhlodromus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). South. Calif. Acad. Sc. Bul., 53: 89-92.
  • McMurtry JA, Croft BA 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Ann.
  • McMurtry J.A., Moraes G.J.de 1984. Some phytoseiid mites from the South Pacific, with descriptions of new species and a definition of the Amblyseius largoensis species group. Int. J. Acarol., 10: 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01647958408683347
  • McMurtry J.A., Moraes G.J. de, Sourasso N.F. 2013. Revision of the life styles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Syst. Appl. Acarol., 18: 297-320. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.18.4.1
  • Moraes G.J. de, McMurtry J.A., Denmark H.A. 1986. A catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. References to taxonomy, synonymy, distribution and habitat. EMBRAPA - DDT, Brasilia, Brazil, 353
  • Muma M.H. 1961. Subfamiles, genera, and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Fla. St. Mus. Bull., 5(7): 267-302.
  • Okassa M., Kreiter S., Guichou S., Tixier M.-S. 2011. Molecular and morphological boundaries of the predator Neoseiulus californicus McGregor (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 104: 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01717.x
  • Oudemans A.C. 1915. Acarologische Aanteekeningen. LVI. Entomol. Berichten, 4: 180-188. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.1128
  • Oudemans A.C. 1929. Acarologische Aanteekeningen. C. Entomol. Berichten, 8: 28-36.
  • Oudemans A.C. 1930. Acarologische Aanteekeningen. CI. Entomol. Berichten, 8: 48-53.
  • Papaioannou-Souliotis P. 1981. Predacious mites (Phytoseiidae) observed on various plants in Greece. Annales de l'Institut Phytopathologique Benaki, 13: 36-58.
  • Park Y., Joon-Ho Lee J.H. 2020. Temperature-dependent development and oviposition models and life history characteristics of Amblyseius eharai(Amitai et Swirski) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) preying on Tetranychus urticae (Koch) (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol., 23 (4): 869-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2020.07.021
  • Pritchard A.E., Baker E.W. 1962. Mites of the family Phytoseiidae from Central Africa, with remarks on the genera of the world. Hilgardia, 33(7): 205-309. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v33n07p205
  • Queiroz M.C., Douin M., Marques de Souza S., Sato E., Tixier M.-S. 2021. Molecular variations of the Cytochrome b DNA and protein sequences in Phytoseiulus macropilis Banks (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and P. persimilis (Athias-Henriot) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) reflect population structuration. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 84(4):687-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-021-00648-w
  • Rahmani H., Kamali K., Faraji F. 2010. Predatory mite fauna of Phytoseiidae of northwest Iran (Acari: Mesostigmata). Turk. J. Zool., 34: 497-508. https://doi:10.3906/zoo-0902-23
  • Ribaga, C. 1904 (1902) Gamasidi planticoli. Riv. Patol. Veg., 10, 175-178.
  • Rivnay T., Swirski E. 1980. Four new species of phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Israel. Phytoparasitica, 8: 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03158314
  • Rowell H.J., Chant D.A., Hansell R.I.C. 1978. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family Phytoseiidae. Can. Entomol., 110: 859-876. https: //doi.org/10.4039/Ent110859-8
  • Samsoniya T.I. 1972. Species composition of predatory mites (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) on stonefruit plants in eastern Georgia. Bull. Acad. Sci. of Georgian SSR, 65(1): 193-196.
  • Samsoniya T.I. 1977. Zonal-vertical distribution of Phytoseiidae in eastern Georgia on pip fruit culture.
  • Schuster R.O., Pritchard A.E. 1963. Phytoseiid mites of California. Hilgardia, 34: 191-285. https: //doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v34n07p191
  • Sengonca C., Drescher K. 2001. Laboratory studies on the suitability of Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) as prey for the development, longevity, reproduction and predation of four predatory mite species of the genus Amblyseius(Acari, Phytoseiidae). Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz., 108: 66-76.
  • Swirski E., Ragusa S. 1976. Notes on predacious mites of Greece, with a description of five new species (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae). Phytoparasitica, 4: 101-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980341
  • Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary
  • Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol. Biol. Evol., 30: 2725-2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  • Tixier M.-S. 2018. Predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in agro-ecosystems and conservation biological control: a review and explorative approach for forecasting plant-predatory mite interactions and mite dispersal. Frontiers in Ecology & Evolution, 6: 192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00192
  • Tixier M.-S., Allam L., Douin M., Kreiter S. 2016. Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) of Morocco: new records, descriptions of five new species, re-descriptions of two species, and key for identification. Zootaxa, 4067(5): 501-551. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4067.5.1
  • Tixier M.-S., Guichou S., Kreiter S. 2008a. Morphological variation in the biological control agent Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae): consequences for diagnostic reliability and synonymies. Invert. Syst., 22: 453-469. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS07052
  • Tixier M.-S., Kreiter S. 2009. Arthropods in biodiversity hotspots: the case of the Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesos-tigmata) Biodivers. Conserv., 18: 507-527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9517-y
  • Tixier M.-S., Principato D., Douin M., Kreiter S. 2019. Mites of the genus Typhlodromus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Southern France: combined morphological and molecular approaches for species identification. Zootaxa, 4604(2): 242-280. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4604.2.2
  • Tixier M.-S., Ferrero M., Okassa M., Guichou S., Kreiter S. 2010a. On the specific identity of specimens of Phytoseiulus longipes Evans (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) showing different feeding behaviours: morphological and molecular analyses. Bull. Entomol. Res., 100: 569-579. https: //doi.org/10.1017/S0007485309990617
  • Tixier M.-S., Okassa M., Liguori M.L., Poinso A., Salerno B., Kreiter S. 2010b. Voucher specimens for DNA sequences of Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata). Acarologia, 50: 487-494. https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20101984
  • Tixier M.-S., Dos Santos V., Douin M., Duso C., Kreiter S. 2017. Great molecular variation questions the status of the species Phytoseius finitimus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and the barcoding decision diagnosis. Acarologia, 57(3): 493-515. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20174168
  • Tixier M.-S., Kreiter S., Moraes G.J. 2008b. Biogeographic distribution of the mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 93: 845-856. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1095-8312.2007.00937.x
  • Tixier M.-S., Kreiter S., Douin M., Moraes G.J. 2012a. Rates of description of Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata): space, time and body size variations. Biodiv. Conserv.,*21: 993-1013. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0235-0
  • Tixier M.-S., Okassa M., Kreiter S. 2012b. An integrative morphological and molecular diagnostics for Typhlodromus pyri(Acari: Phytoseiidae). Zool. Scr., 41: 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2011. 00504.x
  • Tixier M.-S., Perez Martinez S., Douin M. 2020a. Markers for life traits: the example of variations in morphology, molecular and amino acid sequences within the species Typhlodromus (Anthoseius)
  • Tixier M.-S., Douin M., Oliva R., Gonzalez L., Pount B., Kreiter S. 2020. Distribution and biological features of the species Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) recki (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Tetranychus urticae, T. evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) and Aculops lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae). Acarologia, 60(4): 684-697. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20204396
  • Tsolakis H., Tixier M.-S., Kreiter S., Ragusa S. 2012. The genus concept within the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Parasitiformes). Historical review and phylogenetic analyses of the genus Neoseiulus Hughes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 165: 253-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00809.x
  • Ueckermann E.A., Loots G.C. 1988. The African species of the subgenera Anthoseius De Leon and Amblyseius Berlese (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Entomol. Mem., Dep. Agric. Water Supply, Rep. South Africa 73, 168 pp.
  • Wainstein B.A. 1959. New subgenus and species of the genus Phytoseius Ribaga, 1902 (Phytoseiidae: Parasitiformes). Zool. Zhur., 38: 1361-1365.
  • Wainstein B.A. 1962. Revision du genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 et systematique de la famille des Phytoseiidae (Berlese 1916) (Acarina: Parasitiformes). Acarologia, 4: 5-30.
  • Wainstein B.A., Vartapetov S.G. 1973. Predatory mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes) of Adzharskaya ASSR. Akademiya Nauk Armyanskoy SSR, Biologicheskiy Zhurnal Armenii, 26(2): 102-105.
  • Wainstein B.A. 1958. New species of mites of the genus Typhlodromus (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) from Georgia. Soobshcheniya Akademii Nauk Gruzinskoy SSR, 21(2): 201-207.
  • Yoshida-Shaul E., Chant D.A. 1995. A review of the species of Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina) described by A. C. Oudemans. Acarologia, 36(1): 3-19.