Net art-fine art: progressive versus destructive
Description
The mankind has always been in search of improving its technological discoveries; as a result, culture and tradition were strongly influenced by this progress. Is there art without technique and science? There is. But as far as it is that we can make art without technique, so true is that technique improves art and even help it to develop itself. Technique generalizes, it can deny the irreductible particular cases and forms. The digitalization has made progress and can go beyond the rules that art has already been using. By introducing digital technologies in the field of making art and also selling it, we need a guidance to make it clear what kind of practices are beneficent for those who are parts of the huge mechanism of the artistic world: artists, collectors, curators, art critics, art historians and last but not least for the art loving public.
Files
art2021-05-001.pdf
Files
(355.6 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:766136a2a50cb6cfb011b1a92986ee65
|
355.6 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacra and simulacrum. Ed. Galilee. New York: Semiotext.
- De Duve, T. (1989). Au nom de lárt. Pour une archeologie de la modernite. Minuit.
- Fidler, R. (1997). Mediamorphosis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pince Forge Press.
- Giussani, L. (2005). (ed. By Nemira). The ego, the power, the works.
- Levinas, E. (1974) Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence. Duquesne: Duquesne University Press.
- Saffo, P. (1992). And the 30 Year Rule. Designed World, 24.
- Saffo, P. (Dec., 2005). Farewell informatio, it's Media Age. Retrieved January 15, 2021 from http://www.saffo.com/essays/essay_farewellinfo.pdf
- Saffo, P. (2008). The best forecasters will be computers. Edge Question. Retrieved Retrieved January 29, 2021 from https://www.edge.org/response-detail/10229