Published July 30, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Politeness and the art criticism discourse

  • 1. University of Fine Art and Design

Description

Art criticism usually manifests itself in such written genre-texts as art reviews. When producing such a text, the critic finds himself/herself in a position of the interface between the general public and the artist, and, consequently, between the general public and the work of art. While, on the one hand, the critic has to remain true to his/her role as a guide to mediating understanding and appreciation of the works of art by the audiences, meanwhile bringing efficient/effective suggestions for the artists, on the other, the critic also needs to be a master of good writing in the use of the most effective discourse strategies. These include the application of the most relevant politeness principles for the sake of perpetuating good communication throughout the art world. The present study aims to discern the mechanisms of utilizing those principles in art criticism, in direct relationship to how works of art are (negatively) evaluated by the critics, who may balance between remaining polite and becoming utterly/straightly impolite, for the sake of truth.

Files

art2021-04-002.pdf

Files (247.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b23241fb0451ff7202721e2a191c43ad
247.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Brown, P., Levinson S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
  • Creţiu, A.E. (2014). Discourse and Communication in Visual Arts. Cluj-Napoca: Casa Cărții de Știință.
  • Dennet, D. (2013) Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. New York: W.W. Norton & Co. Inc.
  • Goffman, E. (1967). Interactional Ritual. NY: Garden City, Doubleday (quoted in Myers: 1988).
  • Iacob, B. (2019). A coat of many colors. Essentialism versus constructivism in recent definitions of art. Cluj-Napoca: Editura ASCR.
  • Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
  • Myers, G. (March, 1988). The Pragmatics of Politeness in Scientific Articles. Duisburg: Linguistic Agency University.
  • Rehm, M., Andre E. (2005). Informing the Design of Embodied Conversational Agents by Analyzing Multimodal Politeness Behaviors in Human-Human Communication. Proceedings of the Symposium on Conversational Informatics for Supporting Social Intelligence and Interaction: Situational and Environmental Information Enforcing Involvement in Conversation. The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour.
  • Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction – an introduction to pragmatics. London, New York: Longman.
  • Togeby, O., Asher, R.E. (ed.) (1993). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, IV. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Zdrenghea, M. (2002). Eroticism in Advertisements. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Philologia, XLVII, 1-2. Cluj-Napoca.
  • Zdrenghea, M. (2004, a). United Colors of Benetton: Communicating with its Audience. Constructions of Identity (II). Cluj-Napoca: Napoca Star.
  • Zdrenghea, M. (2004, b). Propaganda Language and Advertising Slogans. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai. Philologia, XLIX, 4.