Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published May 22, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Methodological Issues of Shaping the Environment During the Era of Globalisation

  • 1. Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • 2. National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv, Ukraine

Description

The purpose of the article is to define the methodology of the modern ecological approach to the environment as system integrity. The methods are systematic, polysystemic, comparative approach, transcendental method, phenomenological, and dialectical, which are used for cultural and historical reconstruction of the environment and to reveal the essence of the modern project process. Results. It is proved that cultural practices of modern environment formation become repeaters of anthropological, semiotic and visual turns, and institutions of cultural practices — a branched whole, from ideological guidelines, schools, formal and informal movements, art formations, to virtual communities. Design is a constructive activity that models the universe. It is especially clear in archaic cultures, even in Greek culture. The cultures of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance are already changing the paradigm; the New Age is transforming it, but ethnoculture retains cosmocentrism and variability of space models; that is, the universe is included in the model of the environment as a constructive strategy. Everything models the universe, every thing carries the archetypes of catholicity, a cosmological group focused on the totality of the community, understood as tribal integrity. The scientific novelty of the article is that it defines how modern design space makes it possible to characterise the processes of modernisation, transformation and imaginative space of the environment. The environment is considered as a metacultural integrity at the local, regional, and global levels of presentation of its cultural and historical potential.

Files

Methodological_Issues_of_Shaping_the_Environment_During_the_Era_of_Globalisation.pdf

Additional details

References

  • Abyzov, V., & Sidorova, A. (2020). Osoblyvosti dyzainu vnutrishnoho vystavkovoho prostoru: kompozytsiini pryiomy ta zasoby [Features of the design of the internal exhibition space: compositional techniques and means]. Tekhnolohii ta dyzain [Technology and Design], 4(37). https://er.knutd.edu.ua/handle/123456789/17013 [in Ukrainian].
  • Anokhin, P. (1978). Izbrannye trudy. Filosofskie aspekty teorii funktsional'noi sistemy [Selected Works. Philosophical Aspects of the Theory of Functional System]. Nauka [in Russian].
  • Aseev, Yu. (1989). Stili v arkhitekture Ukrainy [Styles in the Architecture of Ukraine]. Budivelnyk [in Russian].
  • Barna, N. (2016). Estetychna evoliutsiia proektnoi diialnosti v konteksti khudozhnoi kultury XX-XXI stolit [Aesthetic Evolution of Project Activity in the Context of Artistic Culture of the 20th and 21st Centuries] [Doctoral Dissertation, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University]. Electronic National Pedagogical Dragomanov University Repository. http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/11787 [in Ukrainian].
  • Gabrichevskiy, A. (2002). Morfologiya iskusstva [Morphology of Art]. Agraf [in Russian].
  • Glazychev, V. (2002). Arkhitektura. Entsiklopediya [Architecture. Encyclopedia]. Astrel', AST [in Russian].
  • Ikonnikov, A. (2002). Arkhitektura XX veka. Utopii i real'nost' [Architecture of the 20th Century. Utopias and Reality] (Vol. 2). Progress-Traditsiya [in Russian].
  • Kyselov, M., Hardashuk, T., Zarubytskyi, K., Derkach V., & Vyshniak, Ye. (2006). Ekolohichni vymiry hlobalizatsii [Environmental Dimensions of Globalisation]. Parapan [in Ukrainian].
  • Le Corbusier. (1977). Arkhitektura XX veka [20th-Century Architecture] (2nd ed.; K. Topuridze, Ed.). Progress [in Russian].
  • Legenkyi, Yu. (2005). Ob arkhitekture (ocherki teorii dizaina inter'era) [About Architecture (Essays On the Theory of Interior Design)]. KNUKIM Publishing [in Russian].
  • Likhachev, D. (1991). Ekologiya – problema nravstvennaya [Ecology is a Moral Problem]. Nashe nasledie, 1, 3-7 [in Russian].
  • Morin, E. (2005). Metod. Priroda Prirody [Method. Nature of Nature] (E. Knyazeva, Trans.). Progress-Traditsiya [in Russian].
  • Venturi, R. (1993). Raznoobrazie, umestnost' i izobrazhenie v istoritsizme ili PLUS Ca CANGE... [Diversity, Relevance and Depiction in Historicism or PLUS Ca CANGE...]. Arkhitekton, 4, 21-25 [in Russian].