Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published May 22, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Features of Housing Interior Design According to Personality Meta-Programmes

Creators

  • 1. Ukrainian National Forestry University, Lviv, Ukraine

Description

The purpose of the article is to study and identify modern effective approaches for establishing harmonious relationships between a person and his living space in the context of new methods of cognitive ergonomics and psychology, where mutual influence would be based on the principle of mutual development. Methods. The issue has been examined in the context of the use of neuro-linguistic programming tools, from the point of view of which the study of the experience of individual interaction with the spatial environment is of particular practical interest. Along with general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, and generalisation, the authors of the article apply interdisciplinary and systematic analysis, which makes it possible to use knowledge and methods of various disciplines to achieve the main objective. Results. The findings indicate that the perfect solution of individual requests in the design of a personal environment project is possible only after a detailed study of a person’s psychological type. One approach to solving this problem is neuro-linguistic programming methods using a person’s leading meta-programmes. The article highlights the concept of meta-programmes as well as provides their classification and description to reveal subconscious mutual influences of a person and the environment. The ways of studying the psychological type of personality by four meta-programme groups are summarised: values, the scale of generalisation, time perception, and similarities/differences. At the same time, among the meta-programmes of value, five groups of generalised value priorities are considered as the most significant. Scientific novelty. The article highlights the current state of psychological research in interior design and considers a new approach to taking into account the psychological characteristics of a person when designing a living environment. The advantages and disadvantages of using neuro-linguistic programming tools to solve the issue are analysed. The article provides recommendations on the features of the interior and furniture design, depending on the psychological type of a person.

Files

Features_of_Housing_Interior_Design_According_to_Personality_Meta_Programmes.pdf

Files (1.8 MB)

Additional details

References

  • Cherniavskyi, V. (2011). Kompleks erhonomichnykh vymoh, shcho vyznachaiut komfortnyi riven seredovyshcha hromadskykh budivel sotsialnoi sfery [A set of ergonomic requirements that determine the comfortable level of the environment of public buildings in the social sphere]. Suchasni problemy arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia [Current problems of architecture and urban planning], 26, 416-423 [in Ukrainian].
  • Hall, M., & Bodenhamer, B. (2007). 51 metaprogramma NLP: Prognozirovanie povedeniya, "chtenie" myslei, ponimanie motivov [Figuring out People: Design Engineering with Meta-Programmes]. Praim-Evroznak [in Russian].
  • Kovalevska, T. (2001). Komunikatyvni aspekty neirolinhvistychnoho prohramuvannia [Communicative aspects of neurolinguistic programming]. Astroprynt [in Ukrainian].
  • Leontiev, D. (2007). Psikhologiya smysla: Priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoi real'nosti [Psychology of meaning: Nature, structure and dynamics of meaning reality] (3rd ed.). Smysl [in Russian].
  • Oliinyk, O., Hnatiuk, L., & Cherniavskyi, V. (2011). Osnovy dyzainu interieru [Basics of interior design]. National Aviation University [in Ukrainian].
  • Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., Ziegler, M., Jones, A. B., & Funder, D. C. (2014). The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(4), 677-718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037250
  • Runge, V., & Manusevich, Yu. (2005). Ergonomika v dizaine sredy [Ergonomics in environment design]. Arkhitektura-S [in Russian].
  • Somka, S. (2017). Erhonomika ta erhodyzain [Ergonomics and ergodesign]. NAKKKiM [in Ukrainian].
  • Somka, S. (2020). Osnovy dyzainu arkhitekturnoho seredovyshcha [Basics of architectural environment design]. Lira-K [in Ukrainian].
  • Tkachuk, K., & Kupchyk, R. (2013). Osoblyvosti formoutvorennia interieriv rukhomykh obiektiv [Features of interior design of moving objects]. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU [Scientific Bulletin of UNFU], 23(18), 379-384 [in Ukrainian].
  • Yurchenko, I., & Voloshyn, V. (2012). Rol psykholohii vizualnoho spryimannia v dyzaini vizualnoi identyfikatsii, interieru ta obladnannia torhivelnykh merezh [The role of the psychology of visual perception in the design of visual identification, interior and equipment of retail chains]. Visnyk Kharkivskoi derzhavnoi akademii dyzainu i mystetstv [Bulletin of Kharkiv state academy of design and arts], 2, 44-47 [in Ukrainian].
  • Zashchepenkov, V., & Lifanov, V. (2005). Psikhologiya inter'era, ili Moi inter'er kak moi portret [Interior psychology, or My interior as my portrait]. Klass [in Russian].