Published February 13, 2015 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

The Ethos of Film Trailers Quantified

  • 1. Southern Utah University

Contributors

Project member:

  • 1. Southern Utah University

Description

Common arguments amongst moviegoers often reference not only the narratives of the films themselves, but also the creative forces behind their production. “I like Nolan’s Batman,” one might argue, “but Burton’s adaptation was a joke.” This often applies to decision-making in film consumption; if an individual is on the fence about seeing a film in theaters of waiting to rent it, they might consider the auteur behind its creation. If one friend invites another to watch The Grand Budapest Hotel in theaters, an argument in its favor may often be, “it’s from Wes Anderson; we need to see it.” Whether or not this argument is a solid one is not the question, but rather the pervasiveness of this sort of reasoning. Whether the reason is because of arguments such as these, or simply to give credit where credit is due, there is hardly a film trailer today that does not proudly display the directorial and authorial individuals involved in the work. Furthermore, many trailers also let the audience know immediately that the work is “based on a true story,” or “based on the best-selling novel,” even if this is only very loosely the case. It might not occur to the average consumer to stop and think why this is done, but it does draw into question the use of this tactic, since production companies do not use it consistently across the board. For example, one film trailer might proudly show that Benedict Cumberbatch plays one of the lead roles, while another boasts that Steven Spielberg directed the film. This begs the question: What purpose does this serve? And how effective are the trailers in achieving that purpose? In this paper, the effectiveness of this rhetorical tactic will be evaluated. First, previous research on ethos and visual rhetoric will be explored, including contemporary applications of these tools. Three research questions will then be posed, and ultimately explored through the use of a Solomon Four-Group experimental design using attitudinal measures. Results will be analyzed using a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test run through IBM SPSS Statistics Package 23.

Files

The_Ethos_of_Film_Trailers_Quantified (1).pdf

Files (253.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:248abe6cefbc592bdf06fc04de91ddab
253.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Barbatsis, G. S. (1996). `Look, and I will show you something you will want to see': Pictorial engagement in negative. Argumentation & Advocacy, 33(2), 69.
  • Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L. (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation & Advocacy, 33(1), 1-10.
  • Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L. (2007). Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation & Advocacy,43(3/4), 103-113
  • Blair, J. A. (1996). The possibility and actuality of visual arguments. Argumentation & Advocacy, 33(1), 23-39.
  • Corder, G., & Foreman, D. (2009). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: A step-by-step approach (1st ed., Vol. 1, p. 264). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley
  • Finnegan, C. A. (2001). The naturalistic enthymeme and visual argument: Photographic representation in the 'skull controversy'. Argumentation & Advocacy, 37(3), 133.
  • Fiske, M., & Handel, L. (1947). Motion picture research: Response analysis. Journal Of Marketing, 11(3), 273-280.
  • Maier, C. D. (2009). Visual evaluation in film trailers. Visual Communication, 8(2), 159-180.
  • Perentesis, J. L. (1948). Effectiveness of a motion picture trailer as election propaganda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12(3), 465-469.
  • Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (2004). Communication research measures: A sourcebook. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rossolatos, G. (2014). On the pathology of the enthymeme: Accounting for hidden visual premises in advertising discourse. Signs and Society, 2(1), 1-27.
  • Scott, L. M. (1994). Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of consumer research, 252-273.
  • Smith, V. J. (2007). Aristotle's classical enthymeme and the visual argumentation of the Twentyfirst century. Argumentation & Advocacy, 43(3/4), 114-123.