Published December 30, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article Open

PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES: BASIC INTENTION AND STATUS OF ANTHROPOLOGY ABSTRACT

  • 1. Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. Lazaryan, Ukraine

Description

The purpose of the article is to emphasize the insufficiency of reductionist interpretation of Descartes’ heritage and to bring into focus the constitutive role of anthropology in Descartes authentic project. Scientific novelty. Substantiation of anthropology in Descartes’ philosophical structure is based upon recognition of key importance of anthropological intention in previous philosophy as well as anthropological one in philosopher’s own works. Therefore, the insufficiency of established de-anthropologised interpretation of essential intention of Descartes’ doctrine becomes evident. Methodology. The use of phenomenology and hermeneutics enables us to comprehend the key philosopher’s ideas as the manifestation of his personality. The concentration on the interpretation of Descartes ideas as the manifestation of determining influence of external factors is the shortcoming of the established reductionist methodology. Conclusions. It was proved that anthropology that should have been the conclusion of Descartes’ philosophy under conditions of domination of reductionist attitude was withdrawn by the de-anthropologised reality image. The comprehension of the authentic image of Descartes’ philosophy provides special attention to the anthropological element in his ontology.

Files

PHILOSOPHY OF DESCARTES BASIC INTENTION AND STATUS OF ANTHROPOLOGY ABSTRACT.pdf

Additional details

Related works

Is identical to
Journal article: http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/19785 (URL)

References

  • Dekart R. Sochineniya: V 2-kh tt [Works: in 2 vols]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1989. – T. 1. 654 p.
  • Jean-Luc Marion. On Descartes' Metaphysical Prism: The Constitution and the Limits of Onto-theo-logy in Cartesian Thought. University of Chicago 1999. - 370р.
  • Jean-Luc Marion. On the Ego on the God.: further Cartesian question / translated by Christina M. Gschwandter. – New York, 2007. – 277p.
  • Koplston F.Ch. Istoriya srednevekovoy filosofii [History of Medieval Philosophy]. Moscow, Enigma Publ., 1997. 512 p.
  • Seneka. O schastlivoy zhizni // Rimskie stoiki: Seneka, Epiktet, Mark Avreliy [Oh happy life]. Moscow, Respublika Publ, 1995, 463 p.
  • Cottingham J. Cartesian Reflections. Essays on Descartes's Philosophy. – Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008. – 332 р.
  • Khaydeggger M. Yevropeyskiy nigilizm [European nihilism] // Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii. Moscow, 1988. 261–313 pp.
  • Khaydegger M. Yevropeyskiy nigilizm [European nihilism] // Khaydeggger M. Vremya i bytie. Moscow, 1993. 63–176 pp.
  • Malivśký A.M. Hajdehher pro antropolohični intenciji Filosofuvannia Dekarta [Heidegger anthropological intention of philosophizing Descartes] // Antropolohični vymiry filosofśkych doslidžeń. Zbirnyk naukovych prać, № 3, p. 14-22.
  • Hanna Arendt. Ctanovyšče liudyny [The situation of human]. Pereklala z anhl. Marija Zubryćka. 1999. 255 p.
  • Khesle V. Genii filosofii Novogo vremeni [Genes philosophy Newtime]. Moscow, 1992. p. 198.
  • Bitbol-Hesperies A. Cartesian physiology // Descartes' Natural Philosophy / ed. вy Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, John Sutton. – London: Routledge, 2000. – Р. 349–382.
  • Voss S. The End of Anthropology // Reason, Will and Sensation / ed. John Cottingham. – Oxford: Clarendot Press, 1994. – P. 273–306.
  • Sartr Zh.P. Kartezianskaya svoboda [Cartesian freedom] // Sartr Zh.P. Problemy metoda. Stati. 222 p., 197-216 pp.
  • Dekart R. Chelovek [Man]. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2012. 128 p.
  • Œuvres complètes in 11 vol. – Paris: Vrin, publiées par Ch. Adam et P. Tannery, 1996.
  • Wilson Catherine. Descartes and Augustine // A Сompanion to Descartes / edited by Janet Broughton and John Carriero. Blackwell Publishing. 2008. p. 33-51.
  • Mayorov G.G. Formirovanie srednevekovoy filosofii [Formation of medieval philosophy]. 1979.