Published September 13, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Environmental DNA reveals fine-scale habitat associations for sedentary and resident marine species across a coastal mosaic of soft and hard-bottom habitats

Description

Accurate knowledge on spatiotemporal distributions of marine species and their association with surrounding habitats is crucial to inform adaptive management actions responding to coastal degradation across the globe. Here, we investigate the potential use of environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect species-habitat associations in a patchy coastal area of the Baltic Sea. We directly compare species-specific qPCR analysis of eDNA with baited remote underwater video systems (BRUVS), two non-invasive methods widely used to monitor marine habitats. Four focal species (cod Gadus morhua, flounder Platichthys flesus, plaice Pleuronectes platessa and goldsinny wrasse Ctenolabrus rupestris) were selected based on contrasting habitat associations (reef- vs. sand-associated species), as well as differential levels of mobility and residency, to investigate whether these factors affected the detection of species-habitat associations from eDNA. To this end, a species-specific qPCR assay for goldsinny wrasse is developed and made available herein. In addition, potential correlations between eDNA signals and abundance counts (MaxN) from videos were assessed. Results from Bayesian multi-level models revealed strong evidence for a sand association for sedentary flounder (98% posterior probability) and a reef association for highly resident wrasse (99% posterior probability) using eDNA, in agreement with BRUVS. However, contrary to BRUVS, eDNA sampling did not detect habitat associations for cod or plaice. We found a positive correlation between eDNA detection and MaxN for wrasse (posterior probability 95%), but not for the remaining species and explanatory power of all relationships was generally limited. Our results indicate that eDNA sampling can detect species-habitat associations on a fine spatial scale, yet this ability likely depends on the mobility and residency of the target organism, with associations for sedentary or resident species most likely to be detected. Combined sampling with conventional non-invasive methods is advised to improve detection of habitat associations for mobile and transient species, or for species with low eDNA concentrations. 

Notes

Explanation of the different variables used in the two datasets are provided in the ReadMe file.

Funding provided by: The Velux Foundations
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008397
Award Number:

Funding provided by: European Maritime and Fisheries Fund
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100014510
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Danish Fisheries Agency managed by the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries of Denmark*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: 33113-B-16-057

Funding provided by: Danish Rod and Net Fishing License Fund*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Files

dat_BRUVS_Cod_2022.csv

Files (112.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:72444307acc266e6436ce460ec4ab9c4
6.9 kB Preview Download
md5:5cb69a28989dc8490f7ff9cd561aede3
6.9 kB Preview Download
md5:77066215487135a48475fa46decc0b8c
6.9 kB Preview Download
md5:c69b266e3398b662bebb5bcf23cd127c
6.9 kB Preview Download
md5:d2a14efa089e657b9862a123b674f8c5
22.4 kB Preview Download
md5:2aa42e438f7b64671f93cae0eaa9485f
25.0 kB Preview Download
md5:3010c4559da721753221fbf58a17bbfd
8.5 kB Preview Download
md5:50c0a23ff71f11f4ab25c1889bc8b53c
8.4 kB Preview Download
md5:fb0f0899819c71967cb35e7f51c7b749
8.2 kB Preview Download
md5:6c3486c58c314fc041116dd15f56bbb6
8.4 kB Preview Download
md5:adec25eb445294793929e6c296fc6ff3
3.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is derived from
10.5281/zenodo.6505457 (DOI)