Published September 8, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

The Temperature Changes Within the Pulp Chamber With Different Stripping Procedures- A Short in Vitro Study

Creators

  • 1. MDS Student
  • 2. Reader
  • 3. Professor & Head,
  • 4. Professor

Description

Objective: To measure the temperature changes in the pulp chamber when different stripping procedures were used without any type of coolant.
    Materials & Method:     Extracted human teeth were used in this study. The teeth were separated into five groups. Mesial and distal sides of the teeth were used separately. The stripping procedures were performed on premolars with a metal handheld stripper, stripping disk, or tungsten carbide bur diamond bur. A J-type thermocouple wire was positioned in the centre of the pulp chamber and was connected to a data logger during application of stripping procedures.
    Result: According to one-way ANOVA, temperature rise in the pulp chamber varied significantly depending on the stripping procedure (P< 0.001). The null hypothesis proposed in our study was rejected as stripping procedure elevated the temperature in the pulp chamber significantly (P<0.001).
    Conclusion: Frictional heat is a common side effect of stripping procedures.

Files

The temperature changes1.pdf

Files (5.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4df41e5de9ef67ef70c17c3437e56204
5.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Betteridge MA. The effects of interdental stripping on the labial segments. Br J Orthod. 1981;8:193–197.
  • 2. Sheridan JJ. Air-rotor stripping update. J Clin Orthod. 1987; 21:781–787.
  • 3. Zachrisson BU, Bjorn U. Zachrisson on excellence in finishing. Part 2. J Clin Orthod. 1986;20:536–556.
  • 4. Peck H, Peck S. An index for the assessing tooth shape deviations as applied to the mandibular incisors. Am J Orthod. 1972;61:384–401.
  • 5. Vanarsdall RL Jr. Periodontal-orthodontic relationships. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL Jr, eds. Orthodontics: Current
  • 6. Principles and Techniques. 3rd ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2000:801–838.
  • 7. Tuverson DL. Anterior interocclusal relations. Part 1. Am J Orthod. 1980;78:361–370.
  • 8. Williams R. Eliminating lower retention. J Clin Orthod. 1985; 19:342–348.
  • 9. Sheridan JJ. Air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod. 1985;19:43–59.
  • 10. Pinherio M. Interproximal enamel reduction. World J Orthod. 2002;3:223–232.
  • 11. Twesme DA, Firestone RA, Heaven TJ, Feagin FF, Jacobson A. Air-rotor stripping and enamel demineralization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:142–152.
  • 12. Radlanski RJ, Jager A, Schwestka R, Bertzbach F. Plaque accumulations caused by interdental stripping. Am J Orthod. 1988;94:416–420.
  • 13. Joseph VP, Rossouw PE, Basson NJ. Orthodontic microabrasivereproximation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1992;102:351–359.
  • 14. Crain G, Sheridan JJ. Susceptibility to caries and periodontal disease after posterior air-rotor stripping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;24:84–85.
  • 15. Sheridan JJ, Ledoux PM. Air rotor stripping and proximal sealants: an SEM evaluation. J Clin Orthod. 1989;23:790–794.
  • 16. Zachrisson BU. Zachrisson on excellence finishing. Part 1. J Clin Orthod. 1986;20:460–482.
  • 17. Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965;19:515–530.
  • 18. Uysal T, Eldeniz AU, Usumez S, Usumez A. Thermal changes in the pulp chamber during different adhesive clean-up procedures. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:216–221.
  • 19. Nordenvall KJ, Brannstrom M, Malmgren O. Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth. Am J Orthod. 1980;78:99–108.
  • 20. Ozturk B, Usumez A, Ozturk AN, Ozer F. In vitro assessment of temperature change in the pulp chamber during cavity preparation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:436–440.
  • 21. Jost-Brinkmann P-G, Stein H, Miethke R-R, Nakata M. Histologic investigation of the human pulp after thermos debonding of metal and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop. 1992;102:410–417.
  • 22. Smith TM, Olejniczak AJ, Martin LM, Reid DJ. Variation inhominoid molar enamel thickness. J Hum Evol. 2005;48:575–592.
  • 23. Grine FE. Scaling of tooth enamel thickness, and molarcrown size reduction in modern humans. S Afr J Sci. 2002;98:503–509.
  • 24. Ottl P, Lauer HC. Temperature response in the pulpalchamber during ultrahigh-speed tooth preparation with diamond burs of different grit. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80:12–19.
  • 25. Usumez A, Ozturk N. Temperature increase during resincement polymerization under a ceramic restoration: effectof type of curing units. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:200–204.
  • 26. Bhaskar SN, Lilly GE. Intrapulpal temperature during cavitypreparation. J Dent Res. 1965;44:644–647.
  • 27. Barkmeier WW, Cooley RL. Temperature change causedby reducing pins in dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:630–633.
  • 28. Ma T, Marangoni RD, Flint W. In vitro comparison of debonding force and intrapulpal temperature changes duringceramic orthodontic bracket removal using a carbon dioxidelaser. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:203–210.
  • 29. Schuchard A. A histologic assessment of low-torque, ultrahigh-speed cutting technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1975;34:644–651.
  • 30. Sato K. Relation between acid dissolution and histologicalalteration of heated tooth enamel. Caries Res. 1983;17:490–495.
  • 31. Robinson HB, Lefkowitz W. Operative dentistry and thepulp. J Prosthet Dent. 1962;12:985–1001.
  • 32. Taira M, Wakasa K, Yamaki M, Matsui A. Heat generatedwhen cutting natural tooth enamel, composite resin modeltooth enamel and glass-ceramic Typodont tooth. HiroshimaDaigakuShigaku Zasshi. 1990;22:210–212.
  • 33. Moulding MB, Loney RW. The effect of cooling techniquesonintrapulpal temperature during direct fabrication of provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4:332–336.
  • 34. Nyborg H, Brannstrom M. Pulp reaction to heat. J ProsthetDent. 1968;19:605–612.
  • 35. Kemppainen P, Leppanen H, Jyvasjarvi E, Pertovaara A.Blood flow increase in the orofacial area of humans inducedby painful stimulation. Brain Res Bull. 1994;33:655–662.
  • 36. Raab WHM. Temperature changes in pulpal microcirculation. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1992;88:469–479.
  • 37. Hannig M, Bott B. In-vitro pulp temperature rise during composite resin polymerization with various light-curing sources