File uploads: We have fixed an issue which caused file uploads to fail. We apologise for the inconvenience it may have caused.

Published August 31, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Multi-Com : A New Treatment Approach To Rehab Implant Supported Fully Edentulous Arches

  • 1. PG
  • 2. associate Professor
  • 3. Professor & HOD

Description

Maxillary complete edentulism a very common situation in dental practice. Various treatment options are also available to rehabilitate the completely edentulous arches. Among many treatment options, Implant-supported prostheses is one predictable treatment option with high success rate including patient satisfaction. Fixed treatment options for edentulous maxillary arch include implant supported metal-porcelain prosthesis and Hybrid prosthesis. Both the treatment options are case dependent. 

Files

MultiCom A New Treatment1.pdf

Files (571.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bb583ba2d1d776f4ff4ffa6e896baa24
571.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • 1. Misch CE, Misch-Dietsh F: Preimplant prosthodontics. In Misch CE, editor: Dental implant prosthetics, St Louis, 2005, Mosby.
  • 2. Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley M, et al: Consensus Conference Panel Reports: Crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry—part 1, Implant Dent 14:312–318, 2005.
  • 3. Bechir, Edwin &Bechir, A. &Cherana, Gioga& Manu, Roxana &Burcea, A. &Dascalu, Ionela. (2016). The Advantages of BioHPP Polymer as Superstructure Material in Oral Implantology. Materiale Plastic. 53.
  • 4. Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The Use of a Modified Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) as an Alternative Framework Material for Removable Dental Prostheses. A Clinical Report. J Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;25(7):580-584.
  • 5. Priest G, Smith J, Wilson MG. Implant survival and prosthetic complications of mandibular metal-acrylic resin implant complete fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jun;111(6):466-75. 6. Jemt T, Johansson J. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxilla: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8: 61-9.
  • 7. Bozini T, Petridis H, Tzanas K, Garefis P. A meta-analysis of prosthodontic complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in edentulous patients after an observation period of at least 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26: 304-18.
  • 8. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:329-36.
  • 9. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JYK. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121-32.
  • 10. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Brägger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. I: Implant-supported FPD's. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:625-42. https://www.bredent.co.uk/products/physiological-veneering/visio-cam/brecam-multicom/