Hydrothermal carbonization as an alternative sanitation technology: process optimization and development of low-cost reactor
Creators
- 1. Institute of Natural Resource Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wädenswil, 8820, Switzerland
- 2. Institute of Agricultural Engineering, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, 70599, Germany
- 3. Institute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Wädenswil, 8820, Switzerland
- 4. Postharvest Technology, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy, Potsdam-Bornim, 14469, Germany
Description
Background: The provision of safe sanitation services is essential for human well-being and environmental integrity, but it is often lacking in less developed communities with insufficient financial and technical resources. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) has been suggested as an alternative sanitation technology, producing value-added products from faecal waste. We evaluated the HTC technology for raw human waste treatment in terms of resource recovery. In addition, we constructed and tested a low-cost HTC reactor for its technical feasibility.
Methods: Raw human faeces were hydrothermally treated in a mild severity range (≤ 200 °C and ≤ 1 hr). The total energy recovery was analysed from the energy input, higher heating value (HHV) of hydrochar and biomethane potential of process water. The nutrient contents were recovered through struvite precipitation employing process water and acid leachate from hydrochar ash. A bench-scale low-cost reactor (BLR) was developed using widely available materials and tested for human faeces treatment.
Results: The hydrochar had HHVs (23.2 - 25.2 MJ/kg) comparable to bituminous coal. The calorific value of hydrochar accounted for more than 90% of the total energy recovery. Around 78% of phosphorus in feedstock was retained in hydrochar ash, while 15% was in process water. 72% of the initial phosphorus can be recovered as struvite when deficient Mg and NH 4 are supplemented. The experiments with BLR showed stable operation for faecal waste treatment with an energy efficiency comparable to a commercial reactor system.
Conclusions: This research presents a proof of concept for the hydrothermal treatment of faecal waste as an alternative sanitation technology, by providing a quantitative evaluation of the resource recovery of energy and nutrients. The experiments with the BLR demonstrate the technical feasibility of the low-cost reactor and support its further development on a larger scale to reach practical implementation.
Files
openreseurope-1-15435.pdf
Files
(2.4 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:bfec13043e2987204fd97faee770b5d3
|
2.4 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Afolabi OOD, Sohail M (2017). Comparative evaluation of conventional and microwave hydrothermal carbonization of human biowaste for value recovery. Water Sci Technol. doi:10.2166/wst.2017.164
- Afolabi OOD, Sohail M, Thomas CLP (2017). Characterization of Solid Fuel Chars recovered from Microwave Hydrothermal Carbonization of Human Biowaste. Energy (Oxf). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.010
- Bargmann I, Rillig MC, Buss W (2013). Hydrochar and Biochar Effects on Germination of Spring Barley. J Agron Crop Sci. doi:10.1111/jac.12024
- Bleuler M, Gold M, Strande L (2021). Pyrolysis of Dry Toilet Substrate as a Means of Nutrient Recycling in Agricultural Systems: Potential Risks and Benefits. Waste Biomass Valor. doi:10.1007/s12649-020-01220-0
- Boot NL, Scott RE (2009). Faecal sludge in Accra, Ghana: problems of urban provision. Water Sci Technol. doi:10.2166/wst.2009.441
- Celletti S, Bergamo A, Benedetti V (2021). Phytotoxicity of hydrochars obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of manure-based digestate. J Environ Manage. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111635
- Chung JW, Ovsyannikova E, Treichler A (2021). Underlying data / Hydrothermal carbonization as an alternative sanitation technology: process optimization and development of low-cost reactor. Zenodo.
- Chung JW (2021). Design and technical drawing of a bench-scale low-cost hydrothermal carbonization reactor. Zenodo.
- Cordell D, Drangert JO, White S (2009). The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Change. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009
- Cordell D, Rosemarin A, Schröder JJ (2011). Towards global phosphorus security: A systems framework for phosphorus recovery and reuse options. Chemosphere. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.032
- Danso-Boateng E, Holdich RG, Martin SJ (2015). Process energetics for the hydrothermal carbonisation of human faecal wastes. Energy Convers Manag. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.064
- Danso-Boateng E, Holdich RG, Shama G (2013). Kinetics of faecal biomass hydrothermal carbonisation for hydrochar production. Appl Energy. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.090
- Desmidt E, Ghyselbrecht K, Zhang Y (2015). Global Phosphorus Scarcity and Full-Scale P-Recovery Techniques: A Review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1080/10643389.2013.866531
- Ducey TF, Collins JC, Ro KS (2017). Hydrothermal carbonization of livestock mortality for the reduction of pathogens and microbially-derived DNA. Front Environ Sci Eng. doi:10.1007/s11783-017-0930-x
- Dupont C, Chiriac R, Gauthier G (2014). Heat capacity measurements of various biomass types and pyrolysis residues. Fuel. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.086
- Fakkaew K, Koottatep T, Polprasert C (2018). Faecal sludge treatment and utilization by hydrothermal carbonization. J Environ Manage. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.031
- Heidari M, Norouzi O, Salaudeen S (2019). Prediction of Hydrothermal Carbonization with Respect to the Biomass Components and Severity Factor. Energy & Fuels. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02291
- Kim D, Min KJ, Lee K (2017). Effects of pH, molar ratios and pre-treatment on phosphorus recovery through struvite crystallization from effluent of anaerobically digested swine wastewater. Environ Eng Res.
- Lang Q, Guo Y, Zheng Q (2018). Co-hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass and swine manure: Hydrochar properties and heavy metal transformation behavior. Bioresour Technol. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.084
- Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C (2011). Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels. doi:10.4155/bfs.10.81
- Mallory A, Holm R, Parker A (2020). A Review of the Financial Value of Faecal Sludge Reuse in Low-Income Countries. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su12208334
- Namioka T, Miyazaki M, Morohashi Y (2008). Modeling and Analysis of Batch-Type Thermal Sludge Pretreatment for Optimal Design. Journal of Environment and Engineering. doi:10.1299/jee.3.170
- Nelson NO, Mikkelsen RL, Hesterberg DL (2003). Struvite precipitation in anaerobic swine lagoon liquid: effect of pH and Mg:P ratio and determination of rate constant. Bioresour Technol. doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00076-2
- Ovsyannikova E, Kruse A, Becker GC (2020). Feedstock-Dependent Phosphate Recovery in a Pilot-Scale Hydrothermal Liquefaction Bio-Crude Production. Energies. doi:10.3390/en13020379
- Ovsyannikova E, Kruse A, Becker GC (2021). Valorization of Byproducts from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Sewage Sludge and Manure: the Development of a Struvite-Producing Unit for Nutrient Recovery. Energy & Fuels. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00561
- Petzet S, Peplinski B, Cornel P (2012). On wet chemical phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge ash by acidic or alkaline leaching and an optimized combination of both. Water Res. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.068
- Rahaman MS, Ellis N, Mavinic DS (2008). Effects of various process parameters on struvite precipitation kinetics and subsequent determination of rate constants. Water Sci Technol. doi:10.2166/wst.2008.022
- Reza MT, Andert J, Wirth B (2014). Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass for Energy and Crop Production. Applied Bioenergy. doi:10.2478/apbi-2014-0001
- Riungu J, Ronteltap M, van Lier JB (2019). Anaerobic stabilisation of urine diverting dehydrating toilet faeces (UDDT-F) in urban poor settlements: biochemical energy recovery. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development. doi:10.2166/washdev.2019.099
- Ro KS, Libra JA, Alvarez-Murillo A (2020). Comparative Studies on Water- and Vapor-Based Hydrothermal Carbonization: Process Analysis. Energies. doi:10.3390/en13215733
- Robbiani Z (2013). Hydrothermal carbonization of biowaste/fecal sludge.
- Seck A, Gold M, Niang S (2015). Faecal sludge drying beds: increasing drying rates for fuel resource recovery in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. doi:10.2166/washdev.2014.213
- Sharma HB, Dubey BK (2020). Binderless fuel pellets from hydrothermal carbonization of municipal yard waste: Effect of severity factor on the hydrochar pellets properties. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124295
- Sharma R, Jasrotia K, Singh N (2020). A Comprehensive Review on Hydrothermal Carbonization of Biomass and its Applications. Chemistry Africa. doi:10.1007/s42250-019-00098-3
- Song C, Zheng H, Shan S (2019). Low-Temperature Hydrothermal Carbonization of Fresh Pig Manure: Effects of Temperature on Characteristics of Hydrochars. J Environ Engineer. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001475
- Strande L, Ronteltap M, Brdjanovic D (2014). Faecal Sludge Management: Systems Approach for Implementation and Operation. doi:10.2166/9781780404738
- (2006). Fermentation of organic materials - Characterisation of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests.
- Ward BJ, Yacob TW, Montoya LD (2014). Evaluation of Solid Fuel Char Briquettes from Human Waste. Environ Sci Technol. doi:10.1021/es500197h
- (2021). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2020: five years into the SDGs.
- Wüst D, Rodriguez Correa C, Suwelack KU (2019). Hydrothermal carbonization of dry toilet residues as an added-value strategy - Investigation of process parameters. J Environ Manage. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.005
- Yahav Spitzer R, Mau V, Gross A (2018). Using hydrothermal carbonization for sustainable treatment and reuse of human excreta. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.126
- Zhang S, Zhu X, Zhou S (2019). Biochar from Biomass and Waste. doi:10.1016/C2016-0-01974-5