Published August 3, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Assessing the level of compliance with alien plant regulations in a large African protected area

  • 1. Department of Botany and Zoology, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University
  • 2. South African National Parks
  • 3. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre
  • 4. Suiderstrand, South Africa
  • 5. Department of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences

Description

Regulations provide the legal basis for managing biological invasions, but assessments of their effectiveness are rare. To assess the influence of national and local regulations on alien plant species richness and composition in a large protected area (Kruger National Park; KNP; South Africa) we surveyed tourist camps and staff villages for alien ornamental plants. We compared our survey results in 2020 with a previous survey carried out between 1999 and 2003, in the context of national regulations on alien plants promulgated in 2001 and 2014. The number of alien plant species recorded in KNP has almost doubled since the first survey (231 to 438), although there has been significant species turnover (93% average replacement across all camps). Importantly, however, both the number of recorded listed and regulated alien plant species found in KNP, and their species richness per camp, have declined (by 38% overall and by 56% per camp). This suggests that regulations are effective. In contrast, the number of recorded unregulated ornamental alien species recorded has increased (by 157% overall), but this likely partly due to an increase in survey effort. Alien species regulations provide clear guidance for conservation managers, and there are promising signs of their effectiveness in directing management in KNP. However, converting alien species lists into priorities for control or regulation will continue to require risk analyses sensitive to park user needs. We advocate for better regulation effectiveness monitoring, and for such monitoring results to be interpreted based on local management needs and concerns.

Files

Combined 2020 and 2008 species matrix by Species full name_site level.csv

Files (4.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:be14e1bbe191f7892eb314aa123c2f07
93.0 kB Preview Download
md5:da9bc1494ca7fed5a002394b8a69186a
86.7 kB Preview Download
md5:ae3b3df9970b49b6523e608759bc957d
5 Bytes Download
md5:045751fb83843c5fa44a1605d28600b0
300.2 kB Download
md5:e729936bf5360b37a15365fc295a1901
143 Bytes Download
md5:f34dee5ac9bad1bc567ccb2246dc228e
257 Bytes Download
md5:1ded637ee4e7f923827b38888fba93b7
4.1 MB Download
md5:3222e1e9ceacf574abb0bee1282f74c0
884 Bytes Download
md5:35f614d0b035db5cd0acaa9b87778401
134.5 kB Preview Download
md5:53c378113e4d444084e746e6d6aebe85
7.6 kB Preview Download
md5:9ae0cf4aa8ee965f7102a013a654d1e1
3.3 kB Preview Download