Published August 1, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

International regimes as a pathway for implementing SDG interactions across climate change and biodiversity conservation

Creators

  • 1. Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia and Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University

Description

Abstract: Policy integration across the domains of social, economic and environment has attracted interest as a policy response to sustainable development. However, progress on the integration agenda has been limited. The adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development aimed to break this stalemate by addressing the goals in an “integrated and indivisible manner”. This article undertook an empirical assessment to understand if, how and to what extent the SDGs influence domestic policy integration. It studies the interactions across biodiversity and climate, where previous studies highlighted that despite synergies across the issue area, institutional interlinkages and policy responses are fragmented. A causal mechanisms framework that identified six possible pathways to influence domestic policy integration was utilised. In investigating the establishment of the carbon market in Malaysia as a form of policy integration, the study found that international regimes, namely the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and influence of market forces were the key pathways of influence. These were largely explained by interest-based motivations. In this sense, the SDGs are likely to be used tactically to achieve interests of certain parties for issue linkages.  

Keywords: SDGs; policy integration; sustainable development; biodiversity; climate change.

Title: International regimes as a pathway for implementing SDG interactions across climate change and biodiversity conservation

Author: Alizan Mahadi

International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research 

ISSN 2348-3156 (Print), ISSN 2348-3164 (online)

Vol. 10, Issue 3, July 2022 - September 2022

Page No: 220-234

Research Publish Journals

Website: www.researchpublish.com

Published Date: 01-August-2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6948433

Paper Download Link (Source)

https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/international-regimes-as-a-pathway-for-implementing-sdg-interactions-across-climate-change-and-biodiversity-conservation

Notes

International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, ISSN 2348-3156 (Print), ISSN 2348-3164 (online), Research Publish Journals, Website: www.researchpublish.com

Files

International regimes as a pathway-01082022-3.pdf

Files (456.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:937df1c57294914b6ac677fc7e1e82fc
456.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is derived from
Journal article: https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/international-regimes-as-a-pathway-for-implementing-sdg-interactions-across-climate-change-and-biodiversity-conservation (URL)
Is published in
Journal article: 2348-3156 (ISSN)
Journal article: 2348-3164 (ISSN)

References

  • [1] Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090033
  • [2] Amran, A., Zainuddin, Z., & Zailani, S. H. M. (2013). Carbon trading in malaysia: Review of policies and practices. Sustainable Development, 21(3), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1549
  • [3] Andresen, S., Skjærseth, J. B., Jevnaker, T., & Wettestad, J. (2016). The paris agreement: Consequences for the EU and carbon markets? Politics and Governance, 4(3), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i3.652
  • [4] Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2012). Complex global governance and domestic policies: Four pathways of influence. International Affairs, 88(3), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01090.x
  • [5] Busch, M. L. (2007). Overlapping institutions, forum shopping, and dispute settlement in international trade. International Organization, 61(4), 735–761. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070257
  • [6] EPU. (2021). Twelfth Malaysia Plan 2021-2025. In Economic Planning Unit (EPU). Putrajaya.
  • [7] Gehring, T., & Oberthür, S. (2009). The Causal Mechanisms of Interaction between International Institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 1(15), 125–126.
  • [8] Ghazali, N., Zainuddin, K., Zainal, M. Z., Dali, H. M., Samad, A. M., & Mahmud, M. R. (2016). The potential of mangrove forest as a bioshield in Malaysia. Proceeding - 2016 IEEE 12th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2016, (March), 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSPA.2016.7515854
  • [9] Government of Malaysia. (2021). Malaysia's Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC).
  • [10] Haas, E. B. (2008). Beyond the nation state: Functionalism and international organization. ECPR Press.
  • [11] Haas, P. M. (1992). International Organization Foundation Introduction : Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination Author ( s ): Peter M . Haas Source : International Organization , Vol . 46 , No . 1 , Knowledge , Power , and International Policy Coordinati. 46(1), 1–35.
  • [12] Haas, P. M., & Stevens, C. (2017). Ideas, Beliefs, and Policy Linkages: Lessons from Food, Water, and Energy Policies. In N. Kanie & F. Biermann (Eds.), Governing through Goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • [13] Hafner-burton, E. (2004). Forum Shopping for Human Rights: The Transformation of Preferential Trade. Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washingto DC, September, 1–4.
  • [14] Hall, J. M., van Holt, T., Daniels, A. E., Balthazar, V., & Lambin, E. F. (2012). Trade-offs between tree cover, carbon storage and floristic biodiversity in reforesting landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 27, 1135–1147. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10980-012-9755-y
  • [15] Hedstrom, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.