Published July 20, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

A strategy for successful integration of DNA-based methods in aquatic monitoring

  • 1. Blancher Consultant, Lyon, France
  • 2. ECO-in-EAU, Montferrier sur Lez, France
  • 3. INRAE, USMB, CARRTEL, Thonon-les-Bains, France
  • 4. INRAE, USMB, CARRTEL, Thonon-les-Bains, France|Scimabio Interface, Thonon-les-Bains, France
  • 5. INRAE, RECOVER, Aix-en-Provence, France
  • 6. German Environment Agency, Dessau-Roßlau, Germany
  • 7. University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 8. Provincial Centre of Environmental Research, Ghent, Belgium
  • 9. European Commission, Brussel, Belgium
  • 10. INRAE EABX, Cestas, France
  • 11. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Gram, Denmark
  • 12. Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Stirling, United Kingdom
  • 13. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA), Lund, Sweden
  • 14. Water Research Institute, CNR-IRSA, Brugherio, Italy
  • 15. Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 16. German Federal Institute of Hydrology, BfG, Koblenz, Germany
  • 17. University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
  • 18. Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management, Göteborg, Sweden
  • 19. University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
  • 20. Office Français de la Biodiversité, OFB, Vincennes, France
  • 21. UK Environment Agency, Rotherham, United Kingdom
  • 22. Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE, Helsinki, Finland
  • 23. French Ministry for an Ecological Transition, MET, Paris, France
  • 24. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 25. Bowburn Consultancy, Bowburn, United Kingdom
  • 26. Water Management, MoAF, Ankara, Turkey
  • 27. Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 28. Aquabio, Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • 29. Italian National Institute of Health, Roma, Italy
  • 30. Meise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgium
  • 31. Environment Agency, Vienna, Austria
  • 32. Administration de la gestion de l'eau, AGE, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
  • 33. Portuguese Environment Agency, Amadora, Portugal
  • 34. ID-Gene ecodiagnostics, Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland
  • 35. University of Geneva, Geneve, Switzerland
  • 36. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
  • 37. BOKU-IHG, Vienna, Austria
  • 38. Federal Office for the Environment, FOEN, Berne, Switzerland
  • 39. Norwegian Environment Agency, Trondheim, Norway
  • 40. Institute for Food and Agricultural Research and Technology, IRTA, Sant Carles de la Rapita, Spain
  • 41. Department for Water Management and Water, OVF, Budapest, Hungary
  • 42. Water Development Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Nicosia, Cyprus
  • 43. Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Leiden, Netherlands
  • 44. Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
  • 45. National Museum of Natural History Luxembourg, MNHNL, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Description

Recent advances in molecular biomonitoring open new horizons for aquatic ecosystem assessment. Rapid and cost-effective methods based on organismal DNA or environmental DNA (eDNA) now offer the opportunity to produce inventories of indicator taxa that can subsequently be used to assess biodiversity and ecological quality. However, the integration of these new DNA-based methods into current monitoring practices is not straightforward, and will require coordinated actions in the coming years at national and international levels.

To plan and stimulate such an integration, the European network DNAqua-Net (COST Action CA15219) brought together international experts from academia, as well as key environmental biomonitoring stakeholders from different European countries. Together, this transdisciplinary consortium developed a roadmap for implementing DNA-based methods with a focus on inland waters assessed by the EU Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). This was done through a series of online workshops held in April 2020, which included fifty participants, followed by extensive synthesis work.

The roadmap is organised around six objectives: 1) to highlight the effectiveness and benefits of DNA-based methods, 2) develop an adaptive approach for the implementation of new methods, 3) provide guidelines and standards for best practice, 4) engage stakeholders and ensure effective knowledge transfer, 5) support the environmental biomonitoring sector to achieve the required changes, 6) steer the process and harmonise efforts at the European level.

This paper provides an overview of the forum discussions and the common European views that have emerged from them, while reflecting the diversity of situations in different countries. It highlights important actions required for a successful implementation of DNA-based biomonitoring of aquatic ecosystems by 2030.

Files

MBMG_article_85652.pdf

Files (1.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1f14cd3018fd69d2c2dbb435cee25bc9
1.0 MB Preview Download

System files (164.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:abcc6a9e64e87d2dc4890d8ff08ef98b
164.7 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Related works

Has part
Other: 10.3897/mbmg.6.85652.suppl1 (DOI)