Published March 23, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

REPRODUCTIVE DISORDERS IN WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE WHO HAVE UNDERGONE URGENT SURGERY ON THE REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS

Creators

  • 1. Lviv national medical University named Danylo Galitsky, Lviv, Ukraine
  • 2. Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine

Description

The objective: to analyze the long-term reproductive effects in women who after emergency gynecological surgery.
Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the reproductive outcomes after urgent surgical operations (after 2 years) was performed in 300 gynecological patients aged 19 to 42 years.
Results. A retrospective analysis showed that 69,3% of women who underwent emergency gynecological surgery had a history of gynecological diseases, but 30,7% of patients were not observed by a gynecologist. Before surgery, menstrual disorders were diagnosed in 42,0 % of patients, pathology of the lower genital tract – 19,7%, inflammatory diseases of the pelvic organs – 7,7 %. 8,2 % of women had gynecological operations before, 13,9 % – reproductive losses, and 11,1 % persons were examined and treated for infertility.
The predominant method of surgical intervention in this cohort of patients was open laparotomy (59,7 %), laparoscopic intervention was performed in 40,3 % of cases. The most common indications for surgery were damage tubal pregnancy, ovarian apoplexy, complicated ovarian formation. Morphological verification of intraoperative findings showed that most often indications for operations were serous ovarian tumors (38,7 %), follicular tumors (22,4 %), complicated endometrioid and dermoid cysts (22,4 %), corpus luteum cysts with hemorrhage (9,2 %), paraovarian cysts (7,1 %).
Rehabilitation postoperative therapy was performed for a limited number of patients (31,7 %), which could not but affect the state of reproductive health of women – an increase in the incidence of pain (42,0 %; p<0,05) and chronic pelvic pain (42,3%) in the absence of such before surgery, as well as infertility (from 11,1 % to 22,5 %; p<0,05).
Conclusions. The lack of pathogenetically intra- and postoperative measures after urgent surgical interventions leads to increase the frequency of reproductive dysfunction, which requires the development and improvement of differentiated rehabilitation therapy and secondary prevention according to the nosology that caused urgent surgical operatrion.

Files

Reproductive disorders in women of reproductive age who have undergone urgent surgery on the reproductive organs.pdf

Files (135.3 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Benyuk VO, Usevych IA, Hychka NM. Reproduktyvne zdorovya pislya endoskopichnoho likuvannya. Odeskyy Med Zhurn. 2018;10:16-9.
  • Boyko V, Terekhov V. Nayblyzhchi ta viddaleni rezultaty likuvannya abdominalnykh uskladnen pislya hinekolohichnykh operatsiy iz zastosuvannyam endoskopichnykh tekhnolohiy. Reprod Zdorovya Zhinky. 2021;(2):22-6. doi: 10.30841/2708-8731.2.2021.232518.
  • Vdovychenko YUP, Voloshyn OA. Diahnostyka i profilaktyka uskladnen pry laparoskopichnykh hinekolohichnykh operatsiyakh. Zdorove Zhenshchyny. 2015;4(100):72-5.
  • Henyk NI, Lasytchuk OM, Pakharenko L, Kinash NM. Profilaktyka pislyaoperatsiynykh hniyno-zapal'nykh uskladnen u hinekolohiyi. Aktualni Pytannya Pediatr, Akusherstva Hinekol. 2016;2:54-6. doi: 10.11603/24116-4944.2016.2.6860.
  • Dubchak AYE, Milyevskyy OV, Obeyd NM. Prychyny khirurhichnoho likuvannya prydatkiv matky ta yoho naslidky u zhinok z bezplidnistyu. Zdorove Zhenshchyny. 2018;2:100-2.
  • Ishchak OM, Vdovychenko YUP. Vplyv apopleksiyi yayechnyka na reproduktyvne zdorovya zhinok. Aktualni Pytannya Pediatr, Akusherstva Hinekol. 2018:2:48-51. doi: 10.11603/24116-4944.2018.2.9215.
  • Pyrohova VI, Ferents M. Fertylnist i ovarialnyy rezerv. Zdorove Zhenshchyny. 2018;8(134):10-3. doi: 10.15574/HW.2018.134.10.
  • Sukhanova AA, Yehorov MYU. Suchasni pryntsypy likuvannya dobroyakisnykh i pohranychnykh pukhlyn yayechnykiv ta mozhlyvosti profilaktyky yikhnikh retsydyviv (Ohlyad literatury). Zdorove Zhenshchyny. 2016;4(110):56-60.
  • Acharya I, Thapa SSurgical Emergencies among Gynecological Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Center: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. J Nepal Med Assoc, 2020;(232):1052-5. doi: 10.31729/jnma.5888.
  • Agresta F, Mazzarolo G, Gardo L F, Bedin N. The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies, has the attitude changed: A single centre review of a 15-year experience. Surg Endosc. 2006;22(5):1255-62.
  • Stickland AEJ, Christian P. Gynaecological causes of acute abdominal pain. Obstetrics, Gynaecol Reprod Medicine. 2021;31:48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ogrm.2020.12.005.
  • Darwish AM, Zhakera M, Youssef AA. Fertility after Laparoscopic management of gynecologic emergencies: The experiences of a developing country. Gynecol Surg. 2007;4(2):20.
  • Diallo MH, Diallo FB, Keita M, Balde DB, Barry AB, Baldе IS, et al. Gynecological and Obstetrical Emergencies at the University Clinic of Gynecology-Obstetrics of the National Hospital Donka Guinea. Open J Obstet. Gynecology. 2021;11:1862-74. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2021.1112173.
  • Stefanidis D, Richardson WS, Chang L, Earle DB, Faneli RD. The Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy for Acute abdominal conditions. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(1):16-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0103-x.
  • Gans SL, Pols MA, Stoker J, Boermeester MA, expert steering group. Guideline for the diagnostic pathway in patients with acute abdominal pain. Dig Surg. 2015;32(1):23-31. doi: 10.1159/000371583.
  • Habek D, Premuziс M, Cerkez HJ. Syndrome of acute abdomen in gynaecology and obstetrics. Acta Med Croatica. 2006;60(3):227-35.
  • Jocko JA, Shenassa H, Singh SS. The role of appendectomy in gynaecologic surgery: a canadian retrospective case series. J Obstet Gynecol Can. 2013;35(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)31047-1.
  • Karaman Y, Uslu H. Complications and their management in endometriosis surgery. Womens Health (Lond). 2015;11(5):685-92. doi: 10.2217/whe.15.55.
  • Liu JH, Zanotti KM. Management of the adnexal mass. Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;117(6):1413-28. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821c62b6.
  • Onyebuchi AK, Lawani LO, Nkwo PO, Iyoke CA, Onoh RC, Ajah LO. Determinants of decision-to-intervention time in the management and therapeutic outcome of emergency gynecological surgeries in south east Nigeria. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014;28;10:577-82. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S66897.
  • Panelli DM, Phillips CH, Brady PC. Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nоntubal ectopic pregnancies: a review. Fertil Res Pract 2015;1:15. doi: 10.1186/s40738-015-0008-z.
  • Siedentopf F, Wowro E, Möckel M, Kentenich H, David M. Patients Presenting to the Emergency Unit with Gynaecological Lower Abdominal Pain, with and without Pathological Clinical Findings - Service Utilisation, Pain History, Implications. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76(9):952-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-104929.
  • Hanoon PP, Dahal P, Rai R, Budhathoki SS. Surgical emergencies in obstetrics and gynaecology in a tertiary care hospital. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2013;52(189):213-6.
  • Teamma MS. Evaluation of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. J Arab Soc Med Res. 2013;8:19-25.
  • Huang Y-H, Liou J-D, Hsieh C-L, Shiau C-S, Lo L-M, Chang M-Y. Long-term follow-up of patients surgically treated for ruptured ovarian endometriotic cysts. Taiwanese J Obstetrics Gynecol. 2011;50(2011):306-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2010.05.002.