Published May 5, 2022 | Version v2
Dataset Open

Smartphone Disengagement - Autoethnography fieldnotes, classification & interpretation

Creators

  • 1. Université Paris Cité

Description

This dataset contains transcribed fieldnotes from a “methodological assemblage” and technological prototype connecting autoethnography to the practices of self-research in personal science. As an experimental process of personal data gathering, the author used a low-tech device for the active registration of events and their perception, in a case study on disengaging from his smartphone.

The dataset contains 267 data points (timestamp and intensity/duration of perceived events) with alternative classification and subclassification categories through thematic analysis, as well as 112 "on spot" fieldnotes and 112 related retrospective interpretation notes (with corresponding references where indicated) from a focused autoethnography intervention, tracking the authors' experience of living without constant access to a smartphone for a month (during May 2021).

For more info on the process and the main results of this personal experiment, here's the derived publication: Senabre Hidalgo, E., & Greshake Tzovaras, B. (2023). “One button in my pocket instead of the smartphone”: A methodological assemblage connecting self-research and autoethnography in a digital disengagement study. Methodological Innovations. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231161093

As described in the paper, this dataset contains a classification of events based on two complementary approaches:

Initial categories (May 2021): Positive - Negative - Reflection

Retrospective categories and subcategories (November 2021):

  1. Response to habit:  
    • Basic impulse: looking for smartphone in pocket  / “If I had it now…”
    • Abstinence reaction: attempts to reconnect to “the cloud”
    • Fear of missing out (FOMO) after long periods of time
    • Disruption in basic routine: perception of altered habits
  2. Social context:
    • Feelings of embarrassment: in relation to others due to feature phone
    • Observing others: people using smartphones around me
    • Meta level: how to share process afterwards (in community, academically)
  3. User experience (UX) practicalities:
    • Moving around solo: orientation when commuting without GPS
    • Parasitic use of other smartphones (in case of urgent need) 
    • Capturing things on the spot (pictures, information, feelings)
    • Local stored culture (music and reading away from screens)
    • Communication problems: dysfunctions in everyday coordination
    • Reconnection need: whenever ending up using the smartphone again
  4. Self-reinforcing / awareness:
    • Succeeding in intended detox: satisfaction for achievement 
    • Full attention to moment / stimulus: mindfulness and concentration
    • Relevant changes in routine: positive reinforcement by new habit

Notes

List of references included:
  • Ahn, J., & Jung, Y. (2016). The common sense of dependence on smartphone: A comparison between digital natives and digital immigrants. New media & society, 18(7), 1236-1256.
  • Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. verso.
  • Bennett, J. (2004). The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter. Political theory, 32(3), 347-372.
  • Berry, D. M., & Dieter, M. (2015). Thinking postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design. In Postdigital aesthetics (pp. 1-11). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • Blegvad, P. (2000). Imagine, Observe, Remember: Part 1 of the Psychonaut's Friend: a Handbook for Mental Travellers. University of Warwick.
  • Bullough Jr, R. V., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational researcher, 30(3), 13-21.
  • Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: a re‐appraisal. Journal of Management studies, 41(6), 977-1002.
  • Chen, P. L., & Pai, C. W. (2018). Pedestrian smartphone overuse and inattentional blindness: an observational study in Taipei, Taiwan. BMC public health, 18(1), 1-10.
  • Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 164-181.
  • Drucker, J. (2010). Data as capta. Druckwerk.
  • Forlano, L. (2017). Data rituals in intimate infrastructures: Crip time and the disabled cyborg body as an epistemic site of feminist science. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 3(2), 1-28.
  • Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (Vol. 18). Univ. of Massachusets Press.
  • Frauenberger, C. (2019). Entanglement HCI the next wave?. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 27(1), 1-27.
  • Frigo, A. (2017). Life-stowing from a digital media perspective: Past, present and future (Doctoral dissertation, Södertörns högskola).
  • Garcia, P., & Cifor, M. (2019). Expanding our reflexive toolbox: Collaborative possibilities for examining socio-technical systems using duoethnography. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1-23.
  • Ghita, C., & Thorén, C. (2021). Going cold turkey!: An autoethnographic exploration of digital disengagement. Nordicom Review, 42(s4), 152-167.
  • Gómez Cruz, E. (2020). Black screens: A visual essay on mobile screens in the city. Visual Communication, 19(1), 143-156.
  • Grosz, E. (2020). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Routledge.
  • Han, S., Kim, K. J., & Kim, J. H. (2017). Understanding nomophobia: Structural equation modeling and semantic network analysis of smartphone separation anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(7), 419-427.
  • Harker, A. (2016). An Autoethnographic Mix Tape: Deconstructing Gender Identity Through Music That Has Meaning to Us. In Teaching gender and sex in contemporary America (pp. 117-129). Springer, Cham.
  • Homewood, S., Karlsson, A., & Vallgårda, A. (2020, July). Removal as a method: A fourth wave HCI approach to understanding the experience of self-tracking. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 1779-1791).
  • Humayun, M., & Belk, R. (2020). The analogue diaries of postdigital consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(7-8), 633-659.
  • Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research on degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 291-316.
  • Kaun, A. (2021). Ways of seeing digital disconnection: A negative sociology of digital culture. Convergence, 27(6), 1571-1583.
  • Kristensen, D. B., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3624-3640.
  • Kuntsman, A., & Miyake, E. (2019). The paradox and continuum of digital disengagement: denaturalising digital sociality and technological connectivity. Media, Culture & Society, 41(6), 901-913.
  • Leung, L. (2008). Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem, and addiction. Mediated interpersonal communication, 1, 359-381.
  • Lucero, A. (2018, June). Living without a mobile phone: An autoethnography. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 765-776).
  • Madison, D. S. (2011). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Sage publications.
  • Mantere, E., & Raudaskoski, S. (2017). The sticky media device. In Media, family interaction and the digitalization of childhood. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Matthes, J., Karsay, K., Schmuck, D., & Stevic, A. (2020). "Too much to handle": Impact of mobile social networking sites on information overload, depressive symptoms, and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106217.
  • Marres, N., & Stark, D. (2020). Put to the test: For a new sociology of testing. The British Journal of Sociology, 71(3), 423-443.
  • Milligan, M. J. (2019). Exploring the Amazon fake review economy. Lambda Alpha Journal, Wichita State University Department of Anthropology. v.49, 2019.
  • Nafus, D., & Sherman, J. (2014). This one does not go up to eleven: The Quantified Self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication.
  • Newport, C. (2019). Digital minimalism: Choosing a focused life in a noisy world. Penguin.
  • Olson, J. A., Stendel, M., & Veissière, S. (2020). Hypnotised by your phone? Smartphone addiction correlates with hypnotisability. Frontiers in psychiatry, 578.
  • Pink, S., Sumartojo, S., Lupton, D., & Heyes La Bond, C. (2017). Mundane data: The routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 2053951717700924.
  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge. Routledge.
  • Ribeiro, S., & Hahn, D. (2021). The Oracle of Night: The History and Science of Dreams. Pantheon.
  • Sampaio, C., & Ribas, L. (2020). On Data Portraits: An analysis of creative approaches to the visualisation of personal data. Proceedings of EVA London 2020 30, 255-262.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). Basic books.
  • Skågeby, J. (2019). Critical incidents in everyday technology use: exploring digital breakdowns. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 23(1), 133-144.
  • Stachl, C., Au, Q., Schoedel, R., Buschek, D., Völkel, S., Schuwerk, T., ... & Bühner, M. (2019). Behavioral patterns in smartphone usage predict big five personality traits.
  • Steinmetz, C. (2020). Airbnb in Tel Aviv: finding place amongst other people's stuff. Urban Research & Practice, 1-16.
  • Syvertsen, T., & Enli, G. (2020). Digital detox: Media resistance and the promise of authenticity. Convergence, 26(5-6), 1269-1283.
  • Thorén, C., Edenius, M., Lundström, J. E., & Kitzmann, A. (2019). The hipster's dilemma: What is analogue or digital in the post-digital society?. Convergence, 25(2), 324-339.
  • Timko, P., & van Melik, R. (2021). Being a Deliveroo rider: practices of platform labor in Nijmegen and Berlin. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 50(4), 497-523.
  • Vanden Abeele, M. M. (2021). Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory, 31(4), 932-955.
  • Veissière, S. P., & Stendel, M. (2018). Hypernatural monitoring: A social rehearsal account of smartphone addiction. Frontiers in psychology, 141.
  • Vigren, M., & Bergroth, H. (2021). Move, eat, sleep, repeat: Living by rhythm with proactive self-tracking technologies. Nordicom Review, 42(s4), 137-151.
  • Williams, K. (2015, August). An anxious alliance. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (pp. 121-131).
  • Wolf, G. I., & De Groot, M. (2020). A conceptual framework for personal science. Frontiers in Computer Science, 2, 21.
  • Yang, H., Liu, B., & Fang, J. (2021). Stress and problematic smartphone use severity: smartphone use frequency and fear of missing out as mediators. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 594.
  • Ytre-Arne, B., Syvertsen, T., Moe, H., & Karlsen, F. (2020). Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities. New media & society, 22(9), 1715-1732.

Files

Files (103.2 kB)