Rhamphostomella pacifica
Description
Rhamphostomella pacifica (O’Donoghue, 1925)
(Figs 8, 30E)
Porella pacifica O’Donoghue, 1925, p. 20, pl. 2, figs 7, 8.
Rhamphostomella n. sp. 2: Hirose 2010, p. 92, pl. 156a–d.
Material examined. Neotype: ZIRAS 1 /50124, one colony fragment, KIENM Collection, RV Nazarovsk, Stn 238, 11 June 1988, Kronotsky Gulf, eastern Kamchatka Peninsula, Pacific Ocean, 54°53.0ʹ N, 162°15.0ʹ E, depth 122 m, rock dredge, collector A. V. Rzhavsky.
NHMUK 2010.2.9.4, one colony fragment, KIENM Collection, RV Nazarovsk, Stn 119, 24 May 1988, Avacha Gulf, eastern Kamchatka Peninsula, Pacific Ocean, 52°54.0ʹ N, 160°01.0ʹ E, depth 141 m, rock dredge, gravel, collector A. V. Rzhavsky. NHMUK 2010.2.9.7, one colony fragment, KIENM Collection, RV Nazarovsk, Stn 170, 9 May 1988, Avacha Gulf, eastern Kamchatka Peninsula, Pacific Ocean, 53°22.0ʹ N, 160°07.0ʹ E, depth 136 m, rock dredge, collector A. V. Rzhavsky.
Additional material. 30 specimens. KIENM Collection (1988) Stn 114; IMB Collection (2011) Stns 3/1, 16/12, 18/14, 20/16, 24/19, 42/37, 43/38, 48/42, 60/50 (see Appendix 1 for details).
Measurements. ZIRAS 1/50124, Kronotsky Gulf, eastern Kamchatka, Pacific Ocean (Figs 8A–M, 30E). ZL, 0.82–1.57 (1.14 ± 0.19). ZW, 0.42–0.75 (0.59 ± 0.10). ZD, 0.52–0.83 (n = 2). OrL, 0.17–0.22 (0.19 ± 0.01). OrW, 0.20–0.27 (0.24 ± 0.02). OeL, 0.32–0.43 (0.39 ± 0.03). OeW, 0.45–0.58 (0.51 ± 0.03). Av(s)L, 0.07–0.12 (0.10 ± 0.02). Av(ad)L, 0.20–0.90 (0.53 ± 0.18). Av(vic)L, 0.55–0.62 (n = 2). P(m)N, 13–21 (17). P(oe)N, 9–15 (12).
Description. Colonies initially encrusting,multiserial, unilaminar (Fig.8A),giving rise to extensive, meandering, erect bilamellar expansions attaining 41 × 38 mm in size. Dry colonies pink to light yellow. Bilaminate parts of colony up to 1.55 mm thick, adjoining layers not fully adherent, sometimes with narrow slit-like spaces in between (Fig. 8M). Directions of growth of zooids in adjoining layers not wholly coinciding, with angles of up to 10° between main axes of opposing layers. Zooids large, elongate-hexagonal to oval, arranged in more or less regular straight, oblique rows, demarcated by fine undulating sutures between lateral and transverse walls. Boundaries between zooids clearly visible in young peripheral zooids (Fig. 8A–G), gradually becoming indistinct, completely obliterated in oldest parts of colony (Fig. 8H).
Frontal shield umbonuloid (Fig. 8A, I), initially convex, smooth in young zooids, becoming flatter with granulated surface (fine to coarse) in older zooids. Small, round or elongate areolae along margins, separated by narrow, elongate interareolar ridges; in distal third to half of frontal shield, these ridges connecting with avicularian cystid visible in young parts of colony (Fig. 8A, E); ridges sometimes fusing along zooidal midline in proximal part of frontal shield (Fig. 8D). Thickening of frontal shield in older parts of colony resulting in smaller areolae as well as broadening of interareolar ridges, with ridges becoming less distinct and often disappearing. Umbonuloid component extensive, occupying about 70% of length of frontal shield (68% in one measured zooid), with fine parallel lineation and accretionary banding (Fig. 8I, L). Ring scar discrete (Fig. 8F), forming regular boundary between umbonuloid exterior wall and extra-umbonuloid interior wall microstructure.
Primary orifice (Fig. 8C, J) broadly semicircular to bell-shaped; distal and lateral margins formed by upper terminal part of distal transverse wall bearing ill-defined rim (Fig. 8A, C); rounded condyles laterally (Fig. 8C, J). Distal margin of orifice round, proximal margin more or less straight or with very weak median convexity, proximolateral corners gently rounded. No oral spines.
Secondary orifice (Fig. 8A–E) transversely elongate-semicircular to irregularly oval, cormidial, proximally and laterally restricted by frontal shield developing two low arch-like lobes that merge with distal part of avicularian cystid (Fig. 8B, E). In ovicellate (and older) zooids, two taller peristomial lappets fusing with two corresponding lobes of the secondary calcification overgrowing ooecium (Fig. 8F–H). Distolateral curvature of secondary orifice formed by vertical walls of distal and lateral zooids.
Suboral avicularium with cystid occupying one-quarter to about half of zooidal frontal shield (Fig. 8C, E), convex in young zooids, less prominent in older zooids, with finely granulated surface and 2–8 minute communication pores on surface. Frontal surface of avicularium (rostral/postmandibular areas) situated on left or right slope of cystid, overlapping or out of zooidal midline, facing distolaterally. Rostrum broadly semicircular, blunt, directed proximomedially and obliquely frontally. Palatal foramen semicircular, conforming to shape of rostrum, opesia small, oval, bordered by extensive cryptocyst. Crossbar complete, with prominent ligula.
Adventitious avicularia varying greatly in size, located centrally to proximally on frontal shield (Fig. 8F, G); cystid broad, inflated, oval to rounded, coarsely granulated. Avicularian frontal surface nearly parallel to frontal shield. Rostrum directed proximomedially to proximally, occasionally distally, spatulate or lingulate, blunt, palate of similar shape. Palatal foramen trifoliate, cryptocystal shelf extensive, opesia oval, bordered by well-developed cryptocyst. Crossbar complete, with conspicuous ligula.
Largest adventitious avicularia sometimes occupying significant area of frontal shield of adjacent zooids (Fig. 8G); in ovicellate parts of colony, ooecia often flanked by two or three adventitious avicularia (Fig. 8F, G).
Very large vicarious avicularia sometimes present near growing edge of colony (Fig. 8B). Avicularian frontal surface facing frontally. Rostrum spatulate, slightly broader distally, directed distally; palate of similar shape. Palatal foramen Y-shaped with extensive cryptocystal shelf, opesia roundly triangular. Crossbar complete, with large ligula.
Ovicells hyperstomial, with ooecium gradually becoming covered by secondary calcification encroaching from frontal shields of daughter and neighbouring zooids. Although secondary calcification sometimes covers most of the ooecium, ovicells remain prominent (Fig. 8F–H). Surface of secondary calcification finely granulated, with divergent sutures subdividing overgrowth originating from different zooids (Fig. 8I, L). Ooecium formed by distal autozooid around shallow, arch-like concavity with communication pore at bottom, situated in proximalmost part of its frontal shield just immediate to distal margin of maternal primary orifice (Fig. 8A, B, D, E). Ooecium with slightly concave proximal margin and smooth ectooecium bearing tiny slit-like pseudopores radially arranged in proximal half of ovicell roof (Fig. 8F–H). Most pseudopores in old ooecia occluded by secondary calcification (Fig. 8H). In ovicellate zooids, secondary calcification proceeding from frontal shields of neighbouring zooids forms bilaterally symmetrical peristome around zooidal orifice. Peristome consists of two lateral vertical lobes, connecting with proximal corners of ooecium (Fig. 8F–H).
Zooids interconnected by 2–3 mural pore chambers in each distolateral wall (Fig. 8M) and two multiporous septula in basal half of transverse wall, corresponding to two recesses with medial buttress (Fig. 8A).
Basal surface of zooids (Fig. 8K) fully calcified, with numerous irregular, sometimes bifurcate protuberances (0.12–0.39 mm in diameter) and transverse parallel folds on surface (Fig. 30E). Boundaries between zooids recognizable basally by deep sinuous incisions. Basal areas of massive erect colonies may contain only heavily calcified kenozooids, very irregular in form and arrangement; these occasionally united into large clusters with indistinguishable boundaries between. Frontally budded zooids, with normal or reversed polarity, also frequently present in older parts of colony, including some with orifices sealed by closure plates.
Ancestrula and early astogeny not observed.
Remarks. O’Donoghue (1925) originally placed this species in Porella Gray, 1848, but noted the unusual combination of several characters: the stout bilamellar colony-form, the presence of adventitious avicularia, and the atypical position of the suboral avicularium. Concerning the last, he mentioned, “The avicularium is always situated nearer one side, never exactly median, and its semicircular mandible is directed postero-medially at angle of about 45–60 degrees to the hinder end of the aperture”. Based on the generic diagnosis given by Hayward & Ryland (1979), Porella species lack adventitious and vicarious avicularia, and ooecia are imperforate or have a single central pseudopore. The combination of characters in R. pacifica that justify its inclusion in Rhamphostomella includes: 1) the oblique position of the suboral avicularium, situated asymmetrically nearer one side of the orifice, never exactly medially, with the rostrum at an angle of about 15–30° to the median line of the zooid; 2) ooecia with numerous slit-like pseudopores; and 3) the presence of adventitious and vicarious avicularia.
In some aspects, R. pacifica resembles R. commandorica n. sp.. However, it can be distinguished from the latter by the position of the primary orifice, and the form of the avicularian palatal foramen and overall colony morphology, as described above (see Remarks for R. commandorica n. sp.).
The characters of the two colonies from Sagami and Tokyo Bays, Honshu, Japan, described and illustrated by Hirose (2010) as Rhamphostomella n. sp. 2, fall within the range of morphological variation observed for R. pacifica.
Ecology. Rhamphostomella pacifica has been found at 97–490 m depth on mixed bottoms, including pebbles overlying silty sand. Substrata include pebbles and broken mollusc shells.
Distribution. In his original description, O’Donoghue (1925) stated: “These specimens are simply labelled Albatross. NW Pacific with no further data”. Hirose (2010) reported the species from Hatsushima Island, western Sagami Bay and also Yokohama, western shore of Tokyo Bay, Honshu, Japan, at 150 m depth. Our material came from 122–176 m in Kronotsky and Avacha gulfs, eastern Kamchatka Peninsula, and along the Pacific and Sea of Okhotsk sides of the middle to southern Kuril Islands between Simushir and Kunashir at 97– 490 m. Accordingly, R. pacifica is a Pacific Asian boreal, sublittoral to upper bathyal species, extending to the edge of the subtropics.
Notes
Files
Files
(11.4 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:d38443c826fcc9ebbea81a968332d32b
|
11.4 kB | Download |
System files
(99.2 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:4a8f5d2da8fac8561ef7610ced268841
|
99.2 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Collection code
- KIENM, RV, V , NHMUK , RV , V
- Event date
- 1988-05-09 , 1988-05-24 , 1988-06-11
- Family
- Umbonulidae
- Genus
- Rhamphostomella
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Material sample ID
- NHMUK 2010.2 , ZIRAS 1
- Order
- Cheilostomatida
- Phylum
- Bryozoa
- Scientific name authorship
- O'Donoghue
- Species
- pacifica
- Taxon rank
- species
- Type status
- neotype
- Verbatim event date
- 1988-05-09 , 1988-05-24 , 1988-06-11
- Taxonomic concept label
- Rhamphostomella pacifica (O'Donoghue, 1925) sec. Grischenko, Gordon, Taylor, Kuklinski, Denisenko, Spencer-Jones & Ostrovsky, 2022
References
- O'Donoghue, C. H. & O'Donoghue, E. (1925) List of Bryozoa from the vicinity of Puget Sound. Publications of Puget Sound Biological Station, 5, 75 - 108.
- Hirose, M. (2010) Cheilostomatous Bryozoa (Gymnolaemata) from Sagami Bay, with Note on Bryozoan Diversity and Faunal Changes over the Past 130 years. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 180 pp.
- Gray, J. E. (1848) List of the specimens of British animals in the collections of the British Museum. Part 1. Centrionae or radiated animals. Trustees of the British Museum, London, pp. 91 - 151.
- Hayward, P. J. & Ryland, J. S. (1979) British Ascophoran Bryozoans. Key and notes for the identification of the species. In: Kermack, D. M. & Barnes, R. S. K. (Eds.), Linnean Society synopses of the British Fauna. New Series. Vol. 14. Academic Press, London, pp. 1 - 312.