Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published April 28, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

INFLUENCE OF BOARD DIVERSITY ON PERFORMANCE OF DEPOSIT TAKING SACCOS IN KENYA

  • 1. PhD Candidate, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya
  • 2. Professor of Finance, Business and Project Management, University of Nairobi, Kenya
  • 3. Professor of Business Administration, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya

Description

Abstract: The study objective was to establish the extent to which Board Diversity influences performance of Deposit Taking SACCOs in Kenya. The study was based on the domain of corporate governance and anchored on the theoretical postulations of Resource Dependence Theory. The purpose of the study was to enrich the existing knowledge about embracing board diversity to enhance performance. Understanding the influence of board diversity is crucial in suppoting the development of corporate governance realm in both policy and academia spheres. The study adopted descriptive cross-sectional survey and correlational research designs. The study used proportionate stratified and simple random sampling technique to select a sample size. Data was analysed through descriptive statistics, content analysis, Pearson’s correlation, hypotheses testing, and regression analytical approaches. Findings suggest an overall correlation coefficient for Board diversity and performance of deposit taking SACCOs in Kenya. The study concluded that there is a significant relationship between Board diversity and performance of deposit taking SACCOs in Kenya. The study recommends that dertemination of board size should be depedent on organisational operations and existing regulations. Further, more women in boards to ensures diversity, legitimacy and build trust. Separation of roles and capping the directors’ incentive act to safeguard stakeholders’ interest. Areas for future studies are exploration of other dimensions of board diversity in different contexts to corroborate these findings.

Keywords: Board Size, Gender, Compensation, Leadership, Pefomance, Deposit-Taking-Saccos.

Title: INFLUENCE OF BOARD DIVERSITY ON PERFORMANCE OF DEPOSIT TAKING SACCOS IN KENYA

Author: Ncurai, D.M., Rambo, C, M., Oloko, M.

International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations 

ISSN 2348-7585 (Online)

Vol. 10, Issue 1, April 2022 - September 2022

Page No: 83-99

Research Publish Journals (Publisher)

Website: www.researchpublish.com

Published date: 28-April-2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6500290

Paper download Link (Source): https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/influence-of-board-diversity-on-performance-of-deposit-taking-saccos-in-kenya

Notes

Research Publish Journals (Publisher), Website: www.researchpublish.com, International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, ISSN 2348-7585 (Online)

Files

INFLUENCE OF BOARD-28042022-2.pdf

Files (935.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5d6687f34ecd4eb5bac59e795e3afcc7
935.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

References

  • [1] Abdullah, H., & Valentine, B. (2009). Fundamental and ethics theories of corporate governance. Journal of Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, 4(4), 88-96.
  • [2] Abdullah, S. N., & Ismail, K.N. (2013). Gender, Ethnic and Age Diversity of the Boards of Large Malaysian Firms and Performance. Jurnal Pengurusan, 38, 27 – 40.
  • [3] Adebayo, O. S., Olusola, A.G., & Oyewole, F. A. (2013). Relationship between Corporate Governance and Organizational Performance: Nigerian Listed Organizations Experience. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(9), 1–6.
  • [4] Aduda, J. (2011). The relationship between executive compensation and firm performance in the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 3(6), 130-139.
  • [5] Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C.R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Working paper, North Carolina State University.
  • [6] Aslam, E., Haron, R., & Tahir, M.N. (2019). How director remuneration impacts firm performance: An empirical analysis of executive director remuneration in Pakistan. Borsa Istanbul Review, 19(2), 186-196.
  • [7] Ayuso, S., & Argandona, A. (2007). Responsible Corporate Governance: Towards A Stakeholder Board of Directors? IESE Business School.
  • [8] Babatunde, M.A. & Olaniran, O. (2009). The effects of internal and external mechanism on governance and performance of corporate firms in Nigeria. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(2), 330-344.
  • [9] Bin Khidmat, W., Ayub Khan, M., & Ullah, H. (2020). The Effect of Board Diversity on Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese L isted Companies. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 13(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0974686220923793
  • [10] Capital Markets Authority (2015). The Code of Corporate Governance Practices for Issuers of Securities to the Public 2015: The Capital Markets ACT (Cap. 485A). Gazette Notice No. 1420. Nairobi: The Government Printer.
  • [11] Cheng, J. Y. & Groysberg, B. (2020). Gender Diversity at the Board Level Can Mean Innovation Success. MIT Sloan Management Review; 61(2),1-8.
  • [12] Chenuos, N. K., Mohamed, A., & Bitok, S. K. (2014). Effects of Corporate Governance on Micro Finance Institutions Financial Sustainability in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(30), 71 – 81.
  • [13] Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Ellstrand, A.E., & Johnson, J.L. (1998). Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 269–290.
  • [14] Donaldson, L., & Davis, J.H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-65.
  • [15] Doucouliagos, H., Askary, S., & Haman, J. (2006). Directors' Remuneration and Performance in Australian Banking. Faculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance. School Working Paper - Economic Series 2006 SWP 2006/11.