Chrysapace costatus
- 1. Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
- 2. Department of Biology, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan
Description
Chrysapace costatus (Bharti & Wachkoo, 2013)
(Figs 42–48)
Chrysapace sauteri (misidentification): RADCHENKO (1993): 76, ♀ (dealate). Unconfirmed record (see under “Remarks”).
Cerapachys costatus Bharti & Wachkoo, 2013: 1191, ♀. Type locality: “FRI [= Forest Research Institute]” (Uttarakhand, India); CHEN et al. (2016: 8, ♀).
Chrysapace costatus: BOROWIEC (2016): 106 (new combination).
Type material examined. HOLOTYPE (Figs 26–30, 33): ♀, 30.3416° N, 77.9903° E, 640 m alt., FRI, Uttarakhand, India, A.A. Wachkoo leg., 4.ix.2010 (PUPAC).
Other material examined. CHINA: GUANGXI: 3 ♀♀, 22°28′N, 106°57′ E, 320 m, Nonggang Natural Reserve, Liwei Liang leg., 24.vi.2013, No. G130254 (GNU). YUNNAN: 3♀♀, Banna Wild Elephant Valley, 8.iv.2017, Chaotai Wei leg (GNU).
Material used for DNA barcoding. Individual AIK20180228-6 (accession no. LC457503), Banna Wild Elephant Valley, Yunnan, China.
Diagnosis. In the worker, cranium subrectangular in fullface view, with costae on vertex strongly and coarsely distorted; eye and median ocellus relatively large (EI, 22–24; OI, 7–8; EI + OI, 29–31); dorsum of mesosoma longitudinally costate; abdominal tergite and sternite III longitudinally costate; abdominal tergite and sternites IV smooth with relatively dense hair-bearing foveae.
Redescription. Worker (Figs 42–48). Body color, pilosity, and structure are similar to the worker of C. sauteri described above except for the following characteristics: costae on vertex of cranium strongly and coarsely distorted (see Figs 42–43); eye and ocelli relatively large (EI, 22–24; OI, 7–8; EI + OI, 29–31).
Holotype worker (Figs 43–48). HL 1.23 mm; HW 1.07 mm; EL 0.27 mm; EW 0.20 mm; ES 0.24 mm; PEHL 0.28 mm; OL 0.07 mm; SL 0.81 mm; WL 1.97 mm; DML 1.59 mm; MW 1.06 mm; MFL 1.17 mm; PH 0.85 mm; PTL 0.87 mm; PTW 0.73 mm; A3L 0.88 mm; A3 W 1.07 mm; CI 87; SI 76; EI 22; EPI 22; OI 7; DMI 67; DMI2 81; LMI 53; MFI 109; PTI 85; A3I 122.
Nontype workers (n = 6). HL 1.10–1.17 mm; HW 0.90–0.97 mm; EL 0.23–0.26 mm; EW 0.17–0.21 mm; ES 0.21–0.23 mm; PEHL 0.24–0.29 mm; OL 0.06–0.08 mm; SL 0.65–0.70 mm; WL 1.60–1.77 mm; DML 1.25–1.32 mm; MW 0.85–0.89 mm; MFL 0.95–0.98 mm; PH 0.69– 0.74 mm; PTL 0.68–0.73 mm; PTW 0.63–0.69 mm; A3L 0.74–0.82 mm; A3 W 0.90 –0.95 mm; CI 81–84; SI 70–74; EI 22–24; EPI 21–25; OI 7–8; DMI 67–70; DMI2 71–80; LMI 53–59; MFI 101–105; PTI 88–98; A3I 114–122.
Distribution. Northern India: Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh (BHARTI & WACHKOO 2013, BHARTI et al. 2016); China: Guangxi (CHEN et al. 2016); Yunnan (new record); Northern Vietnam? (see under “Remarks”, RADCHENKO 1993).
Remarks. The original description of C. costatus (BHARTI & WACHKOO 2013) stated that the worker of this species is easily distinguished from that of C. sauteri by “rectangular head with porcate-sinuate sculpture and longitudinal costate sculpture on postpetiole”. However, inconsistent with this original diagnosis, the characteristics of “rectangular head” and “longitudinal costate sculpture on postpetiole” are actually shared with Taiwanese C. sauteri. Nevertheless, the mainland Asian populations from Yunnan, Guangxi, and India differ from the Taiwanese population (= C. sauteri) in the following morphological characteristics of the worker: the former has more strongly and coarsely distorted costae on vertex of cranium, and larger eye and ocelli than the latter. Based on these differences, we here tentatively retain the status of C. costatus asa distinct species, although the species delimitation needs to be tested based on more comprehensive data in the future. Pairwise distance (proportion of different sites) between Taiwanese C. sauteri and Yunnan C. costatus was 0.068 –0.070 in COI.
RADCHENKO (1993) recorded a dealate queen from northern Vietnam as C. sauteri. Identity of this specimen is currently unknown, but the geographic range suggests its affinity with C. costatus.
Notes
Files
Files
(4.7 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:82bcb9489e6c8e0653d200fafc98484f
|
4.7 kB | Download |
System files
(44.1 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:86934ad87d7048a1905922d0e23623a4
|
44.1 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Collection code
- PUPAC
- Event date
- 2010-09-04
- Family
- Formicidae
- Genus
- Chrysapace
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Order
- Hymenoptera
- Phylum
- Arthropoda
- Scientific name authorship
- Bharti & Wachkoo
- Species
- costatus
- Taxon rank
- species
- Type status
- holotype
- Verbatim event date
- 2010-09-04
- Taxonomic concept label
- Chrysapace costatus (Bharti, 2013) sec. Yamada, Lin & Eguchi, 2019
References
- BHARTI H. & WACHKOO A. 2013: Cerapachys browni and Cerapachys costatus, two new rare ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from India. Biologia 68 (6): 1189 - 1192.
- RADCHENKO A. G. 1993: Ants from Vietnam in the collection of the Institute of Zoology, PAS, Warsaw. I. Pseudomyrmicinae, Dorylinae, Ponerinae. Annales Zoologici (Warszawa) 44: 75 - 82.
- CHEN Z. L., SHI F. M. & ZHOU S. Y. 2016: A new species and a new record of Cerapachys Smith, 1857 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from China. Far Eastern Entomologist 324: 1 - 12.
- BOROWIEC M. L. 2016: Generic revision of the ant subfamily Dorylinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys 608: 1 - 280.
- FOREL A. 1913: H. Sauter's Formosa-Ausbeute: Formicidae II. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, Series A 79: 183 - 202.
- BHARTI H., GUENARD B., BHARTI M. & ECONOMO E. P. 2016: An updated checklist of the ants of India with their specific distributions in Indian states (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys 551: 1 - 83.