Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published October 26, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Interspecific Interactions as a Factor of Limitation of Geographical Distribution: Evidence Obtained by Modeling Home Ranges of Vole Twin Species Microtus Arvalis – M. Levis (Rodentia, Microtidae)

Creators

Description

Mezhzherin, S. V., Lashkova, E. I., Kozinenko, I. I., Rashevskaya, A. V., Tytar, V. M. (2017): Interspecific Interactions as a Factor of Limitation of Geographical Distribution: Evidence Obtained by Modeling Home Ranges of Vole Twin Species Microtus Arvalis – M. Levis (Rodentia, Microtidae). Vestnik Zoologii 51 (5): 429-434, DOI: 10.1515/vzoo-2017-0051, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/vzoo-2017-0051

Files

source.pdf

Files (645.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1baf7703a762490516c8a74e83c5994f
645.0 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFAF7703A7624905FFC8A74EFFC5994F

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.6454395 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.6454397 (DOI)

References

  • Barton, N. H., Hewitt, G. M. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16, 113-148.
  • Barton, N. H., Hewitt, G. M. 1989. Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature, 341, 497-503.
  • Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Anderson, R. P. et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29 (2), 129-151.
  • Franklin, J. 2009. Mapping species distribution: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-340.
  • Helbig, J. 2005. A ring of species. Heredity 95 (1), 113-114.
  • IIASA/FAO, 2012. Global Agro-ecological Zones (GAEZ v3.0). IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO, Rome, Italy, http://www.fao.org/nr/gaez/en/
  • Jiggins, C. D., Mallet, J. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol., 15 (6), 250-255.
  • Malygin, V. M. 1983. Systematics of the common voles. Moscow, Nauka. 1-208.
  • Miller, J. 2010. Species Distribution Modeling. Geography Compass, 4 (6), 490-509.
  • Peterson, A. T. 2006. Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models. Biodiversity Informatics, 3, 59-72.
  • Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., Schapire, R. E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. J. Ecol. Model., 190 (3-4), 231-256.
  • Phillips, S. J., Dudik, M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31 (2), 161-175.
  • Swets, J. A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240 (4857), 1285-1293.
  • Zagorodnyuk, I. V., Teslenko, S. V. 1986. Sibling species of Microtus arvalis superspecies in Ukraine. Com I. Distribution of Microtus subarvalis. Vestnik Zoologii, 3, 34-40 [In Russian].
  • Teslenko, S. V., Zagorodnyuk, I. V. 1986. Sibling species of Microtus arvalis superspecies in Ukraine. Com II. Distribution of Microtus arvalis. Vestnik Zoologii, 6, 27-31 [In Russian].
  • Zagorodnyuk, I. V., Mikhailenko, A. G., Teslenko, S. V. 1994. Voles of the genus Microtus in Moldova. Rodents synantropy, Мoskow, IEMEA, 88-91.
  • Zima, J., Zagorodnyuk, I. V., Gaychenko, V. A., Zhezherina, T. O. 1991. Polymorphism and chromosome variation of Microtus rossiaemeridionalis (Rodentiformes). Vestnik Zoologii, 25 (4), 48-53 [In Russian].