Published December 20, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Open Access, Open Science, Open Data: How it Was and Where We are Going

  • 1. Centre for Digital Research & Scholarship, National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy, Ukraine

Description

Open Access to scientific information, transparency of research processes and data is one of the most important conditions for the progress of science and scientific communication, the basis of international collaboration of researchers globally. The COVID-19 global pandemic has once again highlighted the need for open, efficient and equal access to scientific information for researchers, regardless of geographical, gender or any other constraints, promoting the exchange of scientific knowledge and data, scientific cooperation and scientific decision-making, knowledge and open data. The Internet has radically changed scientific communication, particularly on the model of peer-reviewed scientific journals and the way readers find and access the scientific information. Digital access is now the norm, thanks to the Open Access model. Although 20 years have passed since the announcement of the Budapest Open Access Initiative, and despite many achievements and advantages, there are still obstacles to the implementation of this model, there is some resistance from commercial publishers and other providers, and discussions continue in the academia world. The Open Access model is already supported by various strategies, policies, platforms, applications but is not yet established. Various business models for scientific journals are still being tested, a culture of preprints is being formed, and discussions are underway on the ethics of scientific publications, intellectual property, the need to finance the dissemination of research results, and so on. Various platforms and applications are being developed to help researchers “discover” research results. Nevertheless, this is not enough: it is important to “discover” not only the results but also the research data, allowing them be used for further research in the global world. Thus, the concepts and practices of Open Science, Open Data, development of research infrastructures, etc., are developing quite rapidly. The article considers the main stages of this 20-year path and outlines the main components and trends of the current stage. Emphasis is placed on the need to form a culture of Open Science and create incentives for its implementation, promoting innovative methods of Open Science at different stages of the scientific process, the needs of European integration of Ukrainian e-infrastructure development, the need for socio-cultural and technological change. The main international and domestic practices and projects in Open Access and Open Science, particularly the National Repository of Academic Texts and the National Plan of Open Science draft, are considered. The role of libraries and librarians in implementing the principles of Open Access and Open Science is emphasized.

Files

Open_Access_Open_Science_Open_Data_How_it_Was_and_Where_We_are_Going.pdf

Files (412.0 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Vasylenko, A. Yu. (2019). Rozvytok ta realizatsiia polityky vidkrytoi nauky v derzhavakh YeS: pryklad Frantsii [Development and implementation of open science policy in EU countries: the example of France]. Public Administration: Theory and Practice, 1, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.36030-2311-6722-2019-1-71-77 [in Ukrainian].
  • Kopanieva, V. O. (2018). Biblioteka tsyfrovoi nauky [Digital Science Library]. Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 4, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2018.04.076 [in Ukrainian].
  • Kopanieva, V. O. (2017). Naukova komunikatsiia vid vidkrytoho dostupu do vidkrytoi nauky [Scientific communication: from open access to open science]. Library science. Record studies. Informology, 2, 35–45 [in Ukrainian].
  • Chmyr, O. S., Kvasha, T. K., Yaroshenko, T. O., Chukanova, S. O., Dmytryshyn, V. S., Tykhonkova, I. O., Popkova, N. H., Kaplenko, I. M., Shcherbak, Ya. O., & Voronkov, V. I. (2017). Natsionalnyi repozytarii akademichnykh tekstiv: vidkrytyi dostup do naukovoi informatsii [National Repository of Academic Texts: Open Access to Scientific Information]. UkrINTEI [in Ukrainian].
  • Nosenko, Yu. H., & Sukhikh, A. C. (2020). Vidkryta nauka v konteksti pobudovy suspilstva znan i tsyfrovykh peretvoren yevropeiskoho prostoru [Open science in the context of building a knowledge society and digital transformations of the European space]. Physical and Mathematical Education, 4(26), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.31110/2413-1571-2020-026-4-015 [in Ukrainian].
  • National Repository of Academic Texts. (2017). Polozhennia pro NRAT [Regulations on NRAT]. https://nrat.ukrintei.ua/pro-naczionalnyj-repozytarij/polozhennya-pro-nrat/ [in Ukrainian].
  • Yaroshenko, T. O. (2010). Elektronni zhurnaly v systemi informatsiinykh resursiv biblioteky [Electronic journals in the library system of information resources] [Monograph]. Znannia [in Ukrainian].
  • Yaroshenko, T. O. (2011). Zelenyi shliakh vidkrytoho dostupu. Repozytarii ta yikh rol u naukovii komunikatsii: pershi dvadtsiat rokiv [Green path of open access. Repositories and their role in scientific communication: the first twenty years]. Bibliotechnyi visnyk, 5, 3–10 [in Ukrainian].
  • ArXiv. (2020). Annual Report. https://static.arxiv.org/static/arxiv.marxdown/0.1/about/reports/2020_arXiv_annual_report.pdf [in English].
  • Björk, B.-C. (2021a). Open access to construction it research articles – developments over the past 25 years. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 26, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.002 [in English].
  • Björk, B.-C. (2021b). Publishing speed and acceptance rates of open access megajournals. Online Information Review, 45(2), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2018-0151 [in English].
  • Björk, B.-C. (2017). Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 12(2), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-017-1603-2 [in English].
  • Open Society Institute (Budapest, Hungary). (2001). Budapest Open Access Initiative https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/ [in English].
  • Manola, N., Lazzeri, E., Barker, M., Gaillard, V., Kuchma, I., Gaillard, V., & Stoy, L. (2021). Digital skills for FAIR and Open Science: Report from the EOSC Executive Board Skills and Training Working Group. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission), EOSC Executive Board. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/59065 [in English].
  • Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2013). Open Science: One term, five schools of thought. RatSWD Working Paper Series, 218, 17–47. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2272036 [in English].
  • Hagemann, M. (2017). BOAI: leading the charge on open access publishing. Research features. https://cutt.ly/yYy1nuv [in English].
  • Ayris, P., Bernal, I., Cavalli, V., Dorch, B., Frey, J., Hallik, M., Hormia-Poutanen, K., Labastida, I., MacColl, J., Ponsati Obilos, A., Sacchi, S., Scholze, F., Schmidt, B., Smit, A., Sofronijevic, A., Stojanovski, J., Svoboda, M., Tsakonas, G., van Otegem, M., … & Horstmann, W. (2018, Juli 2). LIBER Open Science Roadmap. https://zenodo.org/record/1303002 [in English].
  • Murray-Rust, P. (2008). Open data in science. Serials Review, 34(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2008.10765152 [in English].
  • FOSTER. (n.d.). Open Science Definition. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/taxonomy/term/100 [in English].
  • Pollock, D., & Michael, A. (2021, October 19). News & Views: Open Access Market Sizing Update 2021. Delta Think's. https://deltathink.com/news-views-open-access-market-sizing-update-2021/ [in English].
  • Shearer, K., Chan, L., Kuchma, I., & Mounier, P. (2020, April 15). Fostering Bibliodiversity in Scholarly Communications: A Call for Action! Digital Commons@University of Nebraska – Lincoln. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/152/ [in English].
  • Schmidt, B., Orth, A., Franck, G., Kuchma, I., Knoth P., & Carvalho, J. (2016). Stepping up Open Science Training for European Research. Publications (Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute), 4(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4020016 [in English].
  • Suber, P. (2012). Open Access. The MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/open-access [in English].
  • Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018, February 13). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 6:e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375 [in English].
  • Varmus, H., Brown, P., & Eisen M. (2000). Open letter. https://plos.org/open-letter/ [in English].
  • Vicente-Saez, R., & Martinez-Fuentes, C. (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043 [in English].