Published April 26, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

EEG in fitness to drive evaluations in people with epilepsy — Considerable variations across Europe

  • 1. National Centre for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
  • 2. Neuro Center, University North, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 3. Juh sz P l Epilepsy Centrum, National Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Budapest, Hungary
  • 4. Neurology Department, University Hospital Strasbourg, France
  • 5. Hospices Civils de Lyon and University of Lyon, Lyon's Neurosciences Research Center, Lyon, France
  • 6. Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
  • 7. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg and Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 8. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
  • 9. Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Program, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain
  • 10. Helsinki University Hospital, Neurocenter, Epilepsia Helsinki, Finland
  • 11. EEG and Epilepsy Unit, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals and Medical School of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 12. Epilepsiezentrum Kork, Kork, Germany
  • 13. Department of Neurology, Charles University, Second Faculty of Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • 14. IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • 15. Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
  • 16. University Hospital of Bucharest, Epilepsy Monitoring Unit, Neurology Department, Bucharest, Romania
  • 17. RehaClinic Kilchberg ZH, Kilchberg, Switzerland
  • 18. Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • 19. Epilepsy Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • 20. Epilepsiezentrum Frankfurt Rhein-Main, Zentrum der Neurologie und Neurochirurgie, Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt, Goethe-Universitaet, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 21. Epilepsy Centrum, Department of Neurology, National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Budapest, Hungary
  • 22. UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
  • 23. Department for Clinical Neurosciences, HUG, University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
  • 24. Neurocentre Bellevue, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 25. Department of Pediatric Neuroloy, Al Obregia' Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
  • 26. Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA; Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, University Hospital Frankfurt and Center for Personalized Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER), Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany

Description

A B S T R A C T
Purpose: Epilepsy patients consider driving issues to be one of their most serious concerns. Ideally, decisions
regarding fitness to drive should be based upon thorough evaluations by specialists in epilepsy care. In 2009, an EU directive was published aiming to harmonize evaluation practices within European countries, but, despite these recommendations, whether all epileptologists use the same criteria is unclear. We therefore conducted this study to investigate routine practices on how epileptologists at European epilepsy centers evaluate fitness to drive.
Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 63 contact persons identified through the European Epi-Care and the Epilepsy network. The questionnaire addressed how fitness-to-drive evaluations were conducted, the involvement of different professionals, the use and interpretation of EEG, and opinions on existing regulations and guidelines.
Results: The questionnaire was completed by 35 participants (56 % response rate). Results showed considerable variation regarding test routines and the emphasis placed on the occurrence and extent of epileptiform discharges revealed by EEG. 82 % of the responders agreed that there was a need for more research on how to better evaluate fitness-to-drive in people with epilepsy, and 89 % agreed that regulations on fitness to drive evaluations should be internationally coordinated.
Conclusion: Our survey showed considerable variations among European epileptologists regarding use of EEG and how findings of EEG pathology should be assessed in fitness-to-drive evaluations. There is a clear need for more research on this issue and international guidelines on how such evaluations should be carried out would be of value.

Files

MarkhusRSeizure2020.pdf

Files (498.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:aca99d39d67c4a5c712d25de6a067db2
498.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

DigRTEpi – New integrated system to automatically record impact of interictal epileptic activity on behavior, reactivity, and consciousness of epilepsy patients 799791
European Commission