Published September 26, 2014 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Uristes Dana 1849

Description

Uristes Dana, 1849

(Fig. 49, 50)

Uristes Dana, 1849: 136.— Dana, 1852: 209.— Dana, 1853: 917.— Bate, 1862: 89.— Stebbing, 1906: 63.— Stephensen, 1929: 64.—J.L. Barnard, 1962: 35.— Hurley, 1963: 91.—J.L. Barnard, 1969: 367.— Ledoyer, 1986: 816.— Barnard & Karaman, 1991: 538.— Lowry & Stoddart, 2003: 284 (catalogue).

Uristoides Schellenberg, 1931: 27.— Barnard & Karaman, 1991: 539 (in part).

Type species. Uristes gigas Dana, 1852, monotypy.

Included species. Uristes contains 2 species: U. gigas Dana, 1849; U. subchelatus (Schellenberg, 1931).

Incertae sedis. Uristes abyssi (Norman, 1900) (family unknown); U. albinus (K.H. Barnard, 1932) (family unknown); U. dawsoni Hurley, 1963 (family unknown); U. entalladurus J.L. Barnard, 1963 (Lysianassidae, Tryphosinae); U. georgianus (Schellenberg, 1931) (family unknown); U. natalensis K.H. Barnard, 1916 (family unknown); U. paramoi (Schellenberg, 1931).

Removals. Uristes perspinis J.L. Barnard, 1967 to the tryphosine genus Cedrosella Barnard & Karaman, 1987 based on gnathopod 1 with a tapering first coxa and a short carpus, a non-constricted inner ramus on uropod 2 and a moderately cleft telson.

Uristes abyssalis (Stephensen, 1925) is tentatively removed to the tryphosine genus Gronella Barnard & Karaman, 1991, based on mandible molar triturating, gnathopod 1 coxa is slightly tapering, carpus short, propodus margins subparallel and the telson moderately cleft. The condition of the male antenna 2 peduncle (with or without brush setae) and the condition of the inner ramus of uropod 2 (constricted or not) needs to be verified to confirm the generic placement.

Uristes barbatipes (Stebbing, 1888) is removed the tryphosine genus Tasmanosa Lowry & Kilgallen, 2014 based on the well-developed antenna 1 accessory flagellum and the triturating molar, maxilla 2 inner plate slightly shorter than outer, the distinctive carpus and propodus of gnathopod 1.

Uristes serratus Schellenberg, 1931 and U. yamana Chiesa & Alonso de Pina, 2007 appear to be congeneric, and belong to a yet to be described genus in the Uristidae based on the absence of a callynophore in the female and apparently in the male, the compressed carpus of gnathopod 1 and the cleft telson.

Uristes adarei (Walker, 1903); U. antennibrevis J.L. Barnard, 1962; U. californicus Hurley, 1963; U. mediator J.L. Barnard, 1962; U. stebbingi (Walker, 1903); U. sulcus Griffiths, 1974 are removed to the tryphosine genus Tryphosella Bonnier, 1893 based on the triturating molar, maxilla 1 with a 6/5 setal-tooth arrangement, the tapering coxa of gnathopod 1.

Uristes velia J.L. Barnard, 1961 is removed to the tryphosine genus Cheirimedon Stebbing, 1888 based on the maxilla 1 setal-tooth arrangement; gnathopod 1 carpus short and propodus margins subparallel; pereopod 4 with weak posteroventral lobe; and telson deeply cleft.

Diagnostic description. [based on type species] Antenna 1 peduncle article 1 without anterodistal lobe; accessory flagellum not forming cap covering callynophore or flagellum with an elongate article 1 (at least twice as long as article 2) partially covering callynophore. Antenna 2 without brush setae. Mandible molar ridge-like, narrow, setose with narrow distal triturating surface. Maxilla 1 outer plate a well developed 7/4 crown. Maxilla 2 inner plate slightly shorter than outer plate. Gnathopod 1 subchelate; coxa 1 large, about as long as coxa 2, subrectangular with straight anterior margin or distally subovate; ischium short (length less than 2 × breadth); carpus short (length 1 to 2 × breadth) to long (length 2 to 4 × breadth); propodus margins subparallel or slightly tapering. Uropod 2 inner ramus not constricted. Telson deeply cleft.

Remarks. As Chisea & Alonso (2007) point out Uristes is in need of revision. The diagnosis provided here is based on the type species. Of the 23 species currently assigned to Uristes, only two remain. Eight of these species are so poorly described that they cannot be placed.

Based on the subchelate first gnathopod with a large coxa with a straight anterior margin and a short carpus Uristes appears to be most similar to the Arctic/boreal genera Anonyx and Onisimus. It differs from both in having a ridge-like narrow setose molar with a distal triturating surface and in not having an accessory flagellum cap.

Distribution. Southern Ocean and southern Australian waters.

Notes

Published as part of Lowry, J. K. & Kilgallen, N. M., 2014, A generic review of the lysianassoid family Uristidae and descriptions of new taxa from Australian waters (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Uristidae), pp. 1-92 in Zootaxa 3867 (1) on pages 80-83, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3867.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5585734

Files

Files (5.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a5a06c5ce34eb62f19712e06f101cdad
5.2 kB Download

System files (42.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:24227983b6bcedb8c9e8f09c2f4ccf20
42.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Uristidae
Genus
Uristes
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Dana
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Uristes Dana, 1849 sec. Lowry & Kilgallen, 2014

References

  • Dana, J. D. (1849) Synopsis of the genera of Gammaracea. American Journal of Sciences and Arts, Series 2, 8, 135 - 140.
  • Dana, J. D. (1852) Conspectus crustaceorum quae in orbis terrarum circumnavigatione, CAROLO WILKES e classe Reipublicae Faederatae Duce, lexit et descripsit JACOBUS D. DANA. Pars III. [Amphipoda. No. I.]. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2, 201 - 220.
  • Dana, J. D. (1853) Crustacea. Part II. United States Exploring Expedition, 14, 689 - 1618, atlas of 96 pls.
  • Bate, C. Spence (1862) Catalogue of the specimens of Amphipodous Crustacea in the collection of the British Museum. Printed by order of the Trustees [by Taylor and Francis], London, 399 pp. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 20901
  • Stebbing, T. R. R. (1906) Amphipoda. I. Gammaridea. Das Tierreich, 21, 1 - 806.
  • Stephensen, K. (1929) Amphipoda. Die Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee, 14, 1 - 188.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1962) South Atlantic abyssal amphipods collected by R. V. Vema. Abyssal Crustacea. Vema Research Series, 1, 1 - 78.
  • Hurley, D. E. (1963) Amphipoda of the family Lysianassidae from the west coast of North and Central America. Allan Hancock Foundation Publications, Occasional Paper, 25, 1 - 160.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1969) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 271, 1 - 535. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854082 x 00632
  • Ledoyer, M. (1986) Crustaces Amphipodes Gammariens. Familles des Haustoriidae a Vitjazianidae. Faune de Madagascar, 59, 599 - 1112.
  • Barnard, J. L. & Karaman, G. S. (1991) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda (except marine gammaroids). Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement, 13, 1 - 866. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0812 - 7387.13.1991.367
  • Lowry, J. K. & Stoddart, H. E. (2003) Crustacea: Malacostraca: Peracarida: Amphipoda, Cumacea, Mysidacea. Vol. 19.2 B. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 531 pp.
  • Schellenberg, A. (1931) Gammariden und Caprelliden des Magellangebietes, Sudgeorgiens und der Westantarktis. Further Zoological Results of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901 - 1903, 2, 1 - 290, pl. 291.
  • Norman, A. M. (1900) British Amphipoda: Fam. Lysianassidae (concluded). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 7, 5, 196 - 214, pls. 196. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222930008678268
  • Barnard, K. H. (1932) Amphipoda. Discovery Reports, 5, 1 - 326, pls. 321.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1963) Los anfipodos bentonicos ' marinos de la. costa occidental de Baja California. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural, 24, 205 - 273.
  • Barnard, K. H. (1916) Contributions to the crustacean fauna of South Africa. 5. - The Amphipoda. Annals of the South African Museum, 15, 105 - 302, pls. 126 - 128.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1967) Bathyal and abyssal gammaridean Amphipoda of Cedros Trench, Baja California. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 260, 1 - 205. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 03629236.260.1
  • Barnard, J. L. & Karaman, G. S. (1987) Revisions in classification of gammaridean Amphipoda (Crustacea), Part 3. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 100, 856 - 875.
  • Stephensen, K. (1925) Crustacea Malacostraca, VI: (Amphipoda, II). Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 3, 101 - 178.
  • Stebbing, T. R. R. (1888) Report on the Amphipoda collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873 - 76. Zoology, 29, 1 - 1737, pls. 1731 - 1210.
  • Lowry, J. K. & Kilgallen, N. M. (2014) New tryphosine amphipods from Australian waters (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Lysianassidae, Tryphosinae). Zootaxa, 3844 (1), 1 - 64. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3844.1.1
  • Walker, A. O. (1903) Amphipoda of the ' Southern Cross' Antarctic Expedition. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 29 (187), 38 - 64, pls. 37 - 11.
  • Griffiths, C. L. (1974) The Amphipoda of southern Africa. Part 4. The Gammaridea and Caprellidea of the Cape Province east of Cape Agulhas. Annals of the South African Museum, 65, 251 - 336.
  • Bonnier, J. (1893) Les amphipodes du Boulonnais (1). Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Belgique, 24, 161 - 207, pls. 5 - 8.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1961) Gammaridean Amphipoda from depths of 400 to 6000 meters. Galathea Report, 5, 23 - 128.