Agrilus asahinai Kurosawa

Agrilus asahinai Kurosawa

(Figs. 5, 14, 21, 28, 38)

= pseudorotundicollis Kurosawa, 1956 = stepanovi Alexeev, 1979

Agrilus asahinai Kurosawa, 1956: 38 –40.

Type specimens. Holotype examined by Jendek (2000) Type locality: “S. Saghalien, Shirakaba”.

Agrilus asahinai pseudorotundicollis Kurosawa, 1956: 40 Type specimens. Holotype examined by Jendek (2000) Type locality: “Serio, Kyôto, Japan ”

Remarks. The name of this subspecies was synonymised with the nominotypical subspecies by Jendek (2000).

Agrilus (Dentagrilus) stepanovi Alexeev, 1979: 134 –136

Type specimens. Holotype examined by Jendek (2000)

Type locality: “Primorskii kraj, Lazovskii r-n, pritok r. Kievka” [Russia: Primorsky Kray]

Remarks. Agrilus stepanovi and A. asahinai were considered conspecific by Jendek (2000).

Material examined. China: Hebei: 1 3, 1 Ƥ (EJCB): “ China, Hebei (Nei Mongol) pass Chengde–Chifeng 41.6N, 118.2E, 30–31.V. J. Turna leg. 2002”. Korea North: 1 Ƥ (EJCB): “ Korea, Sujang–san bei Hedzu, 4.6.1975, Josifov”. Korea South: 2 exs (LJSK): “Aanmyeondo, Chungnam Prov., Korea, 23.v.2004, S. L. An leg.”. Russia: Primorsky Kray: 1 ex (MNAG): “ Russia: Primorskiy Kray, Ussuriysky Zapovednik, 33 km SE Ussuriysk, 43.37N, 132.18E, 10/ 11.VI. 1993, 300 m, leg. L. Zerche et al.”; 17 exs (EJCB): “Sib. or. Primorje, Komarovka flum., Kamenushka env. 300 m, Voříšek, J. leg. VI.1992 ”; 1 3, 1 Ƥ (ZIN): “Primorskii kr. Lazovskii r-n., d. Ta-chin-go-za. 2–vi–1951, V. N. Stepanov”.

Diagnosis. Agrilus asahinai is similar to A. bidentulus in the shape of the prosternal lobe (Fig. 28), but it differs from it by the denticulate sides of the median lobe of the aedeagus (Fig. 14) and the sharply protruding metacoxal plates (Fig. 38).

Distribution. China (Hebei, Heilongjiang (Alexeev 1979)); Japan (Honshu); Korea North; Korea South; Russia (Primorsky Kray, Sakhalin).

Biology. Alexeev (1979, 1989) cited Lonicera maackii as the host plant for A. asahinai.