Published February 20, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Epstein-Barr virus and JC virus Reactivation in Dermatological Patients Receiving Immunosuppressive Therapy

  • 1. Department of Dermatology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 2. Department of Medical Microbiology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 3. Department of Medical Microbiology, Gulhane Institute of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 4. Department of Family Medicine, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 5. Department of Medical Microbiology, Gulhane Medical Faculty, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
  • 6. Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

Description

Abstract

Immunosuppressive medications are the mainstay treatment of many severe cutaneous diseases. The objective of this study was to investigate the reactivation of certain viral agents (Epstein-Barr virus, human cytomegalovirus, BK virus, JC virus, B19 virus, and herpes simplex virus) in dermatology patients who underwent immunosuppressive treatment. The study included 57 patients and they were divided into three groups based on the treatments; patients not receiving any immunosuppressive therapy (control group), patients treated with phototherapy only (phototherapy group), and patients treated with systemic immunosuppressive agents (systemic immunosuppressive therapy group). Saliva, blood, and urine samples were collected from all patients, and these samples were analyzed for the presence of virus-specific DNA by TaqMan-based real-time polymerase chain reaction. In the overall study population, the positivity rate for any viral reactivation in at least one of the investigated specimens was 31.6% (18/57). The frequencies of viral reactivation in the control, phototherapy, and systemic immunosuppressive treatment groups were 9.5% (2/21), 18.8% (3/16), and 65.0% (13/20), respectively. The viral reactivation rate in patients receiving systemic immunosuppressive treatments was significantly higher than in the other two groups (p=0.00022 and p=0.00544), but there was no statistically significant difference between the phototherapy and control groups. EBV (15 patients, 26.3%) and JC virus (7 patients, 12.3%) were the most frequently detected viruses. Viral reactivation is a potential risk for dermatology patients receiving immunosuppressive treatments and it can be considered as a parameter of disease control and management. Our study results also reveal that the safety profile of phototherapy is not different from the control group in terms of viral reactivation.

Özet

İmmünosüpressif ilaçlar, birçok ciddi dermatolojik hastalıkta temel tedavi yaklaşımıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, immünosüpressif tedavi alan dermatoloji hastalarında belirli viral etkenlerin (Epstein-Barr virus, insan sitomegalovirus, BK virus, JC virus, B19 virus ve herpes simpleks virus) reaktivasyonunun araştırılmasıdır. Çalışma grubu 57 hastayı içeriyordu ve hastalar uygulanan tedaviler baz alınarak üç gruba ayrıldı; herhangi bir immünosüpressif tedavi almayan hastalar (kontrol grubu), sadece fototerapi uygulanan hastalar (fototerapi grubu) ve sistemik immünosüpressif ilaçlarla tedavi edilen hastalar (sistemik immünosüpressif tedavi grubu). Tüm hastalardan tükürük, kan ve idrar örnekleri toplandı ve bu örnekler TaqMan tabanlı gerçek zamanlı polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu ile ilgili virüs spesifik DNA'ların varlığı yönünden incelendi. Çalışma popülasyonu genelinde incelenen örneklerinden en az birinde herhangi bir viral reaktivasyon için pozitiflik saptanma oranı %31.6 (18/57) idi. Kontrol, fototerapi ve sistemik immünosüpressif tedavi gruplarında viral reaktivasyon sıklığı ise sırasıyla %9.5 (2/21), %18.8 (3/16) ve %65.0 (13/20) olarak bulundu. Sistemik immünosüpressif tedavi alan hastalarda viral reaktivasyon oranı diğer iki gruba göre anlamlı derecede yüksekti (p=0.00022 ve p=0.00544), ancak fototerapi ve kontrol grupları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık yoktu. EBV (15 hasta, %26.3) ve JC virus (7 hasta, %12.3) en sık saptanan virüslerdi. Viral reaktivasyon, immünosüpressif tedavi alan dermatoloji hastaları için potansiyel bir risktir ve bu nedenle hastalık kontrolü ve yönetiminin bir parametresi olarak kabul edilebilir. Çalışma sonuçlarımız ayrıca, fototerapinin güvenlik profilinin, viral reaktivasyon açısından, kontrol grubundan farklı olmadığını ortaya koymaktadır.

Notes

İmmünosüpressif Tedavi Alan Dermatolojik Hastalarda Epstein-Barr virus ve JC virus Reaktivasyonu

Files

jmvi.2022.45.z.pdf

Files (371.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0b96cbd934c3de995625927181787fc1
371.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • ‎1. Laurenti R, Giovannangeli F, Gubinelli E, Viviano MT, Errico A, Leoni L, et al. Long-term safety of anti-‎TNF adalimumab in HBc antibody-positive psoriatic arthritis patients: a retrospective case series of 8 ‎patients. Clin Dev Immunol 2013; 2013: 410521. ‎
  • ‎2. Traylen CM, Patel HR, Fondaw W, Mahatme S, Williams JF, Walker LR, et al. Virus reactivation: a ‎panoramic view in human infections. Future Virol 2011; 6(4): 451-63. ‎
  • ‎3. Sahiner F, Gümral R, Yildizoğlu Ü, Babayiğit MA, Durmaz A, Yiğit N, et al. Coexistence of Epstein-Barr ‎virus and Parvovirus B19 in tonsillar tissue samples: quantitative measurement by real-time PCR. Int J ‎Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78(8): 1288-93. ‎
  • ‎4. Houen G, Trier NH. Epstein-Barr Virus and Systemic Autoimmune Diseases. Front Immunol 2021; 11: ‎‎587380. ‎
  • ‎5. Chong S, Antoni M, Macdonald A, Reeves M, Harber M, Magee CN. BK virus: Current understanding ‎of pathogenicity and clinical disease in transplantation. Rev Med Virol 2019; 29(4): e2044. ‎
  • ‎6. Sadowski LA, Upadhyay R, Greeley ZW, Margulies BJ. Current Drugs to Treat Infections with Herpes ‎Simplex Viruses-1 and -2. Viruses 2021; 13(7): 1228. ‎
  • ‎7. Farahmand M, Tavakoli A, Ghorbani S, Monavari SH, Kiani SJ, Minaeian S. Molecular and serological ‎markers of human parvovirus B19 infection in blood donors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ‎Asian J Transfus Sci 2021; 15(2): 212-22. ‎
  • ‎8. Şahiner F. Current Approaches in the Diagnosis and Management of Congenital Cytomegalovirus ‎Infections and the Situation in Turkey. Mikrobiyol Bul 2020; 54(1): 171-90. ‎
  • ‎9. Cortese I, Reich DS, Nath A. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and the spectrum of JC ‎virus-related disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17(1): 37-51. ‎
  • ‎10. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Isolation of DNA from mammalian cells. In: Sambrook J, Fritsch ‎EF, Maniatis T (eds), Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2nd edition). 1989, Cold Spring Harbor ‎Laboratory Press, New York. pp:9.16-9.19.‎
  • ‎11. Şahiner F, Kubar A, Yapar M, Şener K, Dede M, Gümral R. Detection of major HPVs by a new ‎multiplex real-time PCR assay using type-specific primers. J Microbiol Methods 2014; 97: 44-50. ‎
  • ‎12. Kubar A, Saygun I, Yapar M, Ozdemir A, Slots J. Real-time PCR quantification of cytomegalovirus in ‎aggressive periodontitis lesions using TaqMan technology. J Periodontal Res 2004; 39(2): 81-6. ‎
  • ‎13. Kubar A, Yapar M, Besirbellioglu B, Avci IY, Guney C. Rapid and quantitative detection of mumps ‎virus RNA by one-step real-time RT-PCR. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2004; 49(2): 83-8. ‎
  • ‎14. Tsai J, Cohrs RJ, Nagel MA, Mahalingam R, Schmid DS, Choe A, et al. Reactivation of type 1 herpes ‎simplex virus and varicella zoster virus in an immunosuppressed patient with acute peripheral facial ‎weakness. J Neurol Sci 2012; 313(1-2): 193-5. ‎
  • ‎15. Georgala S, Katoulis AC, Kanelleas A, Befon A, Georgala C. Letter: Human papilloma virus and ‎molluscum contagiosum lesions related to infliximab therapy for psoriasis: a case series. Dermatol ‎Online J 2012; 18(4): 9. ‎
  • ‎16. McAleer MA, D'Arcy CA, Mulligan NJ, Sheahan K, Collins P. Primary cutaneous lymphoma associated ‎with Epstein-Barr virus and azathioprine therapy. Clin Exp Dermatol 2010; 35(6): 674-6. ‎
  • ‎17. Lee HH, Song IH, Friedrich M, Gauliard A, Detert J, Röwert J, et al. Cutaneous side-effects in patients ‎with rheumatic diseases during application of tumour necrosis factor-alpha antagonists. Br J Dermatol ‎‎2007; 156(3): 486-91. ‎
  • ‎18. Chen Y, Bord E, Tompkins T, Miller J, Tan CS, Kinkel RP, et al. Asymptomatic reactivation of JC virus ‎in patients treated with natalizumab. N Engl J Med 2009; 361(11): 1067-74. Erratum in: N Engl J Med ‎‎2011; 364(19): 1882. ‎
  • ‎19. Kothary N, Diak IL, Brinker A, Bezabeh S, Avigan M, Dal Pan G. Progressive multifocal ‎leukoencephalopathy associated with efalizumab use in psoriasis patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; ‎‎65(3): 546-51. ‎
  • ‎20. Ling PD, Lednicky JA, Keitel WA, Poston DG, White ZS, Peng R, et al. The dynamics of herpesvirus ‎and polyomavirus reactivation and shedding in healthy adults: a 14-month longitudinal study. J Infect ‎Dis 2003; 187(10): 1571-80. ‎
  • ‎21. Niedobitek G, Meru N, Delecluse HJ. Epstein-Barr virus infection and human malignancies. Int J Exp ‎Pathol 2001; 82(3): 149-70. ‎
  • ‎22. Ohkura Y, Shindoh J, Haruta S, Kaji D, Ota Y, Fujii T, et al. Primary Adrenal Lymphoma Possibly ‎Associated With Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation Due to Immunosuppression Under Methotrexate ‎Therapy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94(31): e1270. ‎
  • ‎23. Smets F, Sokal EM. Prevention and treatment for Epstein-Barr virus infection and related cancers. ‎Recent Results Cancer Res 2014; 193: 173-90. ‎
  • ‎24. Warnatz K, Peter HH, Schumacher M, Wiese L, Prasse A, Petschner F, et al. Infectious CNS disease as ‎a differential diagnosis in systemic rheumatic diseases: three case reports and a review of the ‎literature. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62(1): 50-7. ‎
  • ‎25. Carson KR, Focosi D, Major EO, Petrini M, Richey EA, West DP, et al. Monoclonal antibody-‎associated progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy in patients treated with rituximab, ‎natalizumab, and efalizumab: a Review from the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports ‎‎(RADAR) Project. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10(8): 816-24. ‎
  • ‎26. Kitamura T, Aso Y, Kuniyoshi N, Hara K, Yogo Y. High incidence of urinary JC virus excretion in ‎nonimmunosuppressed older patients. J Infect Dis 1990; 161(6): 1128-33. ‎
  • ‎27. Horio T. Indications and action mechanisms of phototherapy. J Dermatol Sci 2000; 23 Suppl 1: S17-‎‎21. ‎
  • ‎28. Gulley ML. Molecular diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus-related diseases. J Mol Diagn 2001; 3(1): 1-10. ‎
  • ‎29. Hess RD. Routine Epstein-Barr virus diagnostics from the laboratory perspective: still challenging ‎after 35 years. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42(8): 3381-7. ‎
  • ‎30. Maurmann S, Fricke L, Wagner HJ, Schlenke P, Hennig H, Steinhoff J, et al. Molecular parameters for ‎precise diagnosis of asymptomatic Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in healthy carriers. J Clin Microbiol ‎‎2003; 41(12): 5419-28. ‎
  • ‎31. Azevedo LS, Pierrotti LC, Abdala E, Costa SF, Strabelli TM, Campos SV, et al. Cytomegalovirus ‎infection in transplant recipients. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2015; 70(7): 515-23. ‎