Published December 31, 2015 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Protomicroplitis

Description

GENUS Protomicroplitis

Protomicroplitis Ashmead, 1898: 167. Original description. No species included, no type species designation.

Protomicroplitis germani Ashmead 1900b: 132. Nomen nudum. Invalid designation of type species. Incorrect original spelling of species name.

Protomicroplitis mediatus (Cresson, 1865). Ashmead, 1900a: 292. Species included, no designation of type species.

Protomicroplitis mediatus (Cresson, 1865). Viereck 1914: 124. Designation of type species (by monotypy).

Microgaster Latreille, 1804. Muesebeck 1922: 20. Status revised (synonymized under Microgaster).

Protomicroplitis Ashmead, 1898. Nixon, 1965: 234. Status revised (genus resurrected).

Protomicroplitis Ashmead, 1898. Mason, 1981: 124. Status revised (generic limits revised).

Description. Head relatively transverse (maximum width of head 1.35–1.45 × its height) (Figs 8, 12, 20, 25); antenna with placodes comparatively short (0.2–0.4 × as long as a flagellomere) and scattered irregularly along the length of the flagellomere (so that the appearance of a middle constriction in the flagellomere, typical in most Microgastrinae, is missing); apical flagellomeres relatively elongated, length of flagellomere 2 at most 1.9 × length of flagellomere 14; anteromesoscutum smooth to finely punctate (punctures shallow and sparse), with little or no trace of notauli (Figs 4, 15, 23, 29); apical polished rim of scutellar disc interrupted medially by sculpture (Figs 9, 15); propodeum strongly rugose and with median carina (Figs 9, 16, 24, 29); fore wing with triangular areolet (Figs 6, 13, 19, 28); hind wing with vannal lobe strongly convex, margin with very short setae; T1 rather strongly constrained medially (width at half length of tergite 0.4–0.6 × its width at anterior and/or posterior margins of tergite) (Figs 7, 17, 22); T1 length around 4.0 × its width at apex, and at least 6.0 × its width at half length of tergite; hypopygium short and not pleated medially (Figs 10, 14); ovipositor short, decurved and abruptly tapered near the middle (Fig. 10); relatively large body length (4.4–5.5 mm, usually over 4.8 mm), and fore wing length (4.1–5.2 mm, usually over 4.4 mm); body length usually (but not always) 0.1–0.2 mm larger than fore wing length.

The relatively large but thin mediotergite 1, which is distinctively narrower medially, is a diagnostic feature of Protomicroplitis. Only the genus Wilkinsonellus and a few species of Diolcogaster (mostly D. lelaps and morphologically related species, all forming what has been called the lelaps species-group –e.g., Nixon 1965) have similar mediotergite 1. Wilkinsonellus has no areolet in the fore wing, and a very distinctive and unique venation pattern. The Diolcogaster lelaps species-group has a quadrangular areolet which is relatively larger than that of Protomicroplitis species (which have a relatively small and triangular areolet). Additionally, the antenna in Protomicroplitis has short and irregular placodes whereas both Wilkinsonellus and the D. lelaps species-group have placodes arranged in two ranks, with the median constriction characteristic of most Microgastrinae.

Notes

Published as part of Fernandez-Triana, J. L., 2015, A revision of the genus Protomicroplitis Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae), with the description of a new species, pp. 529-542 in Zootaxa 4039 (4) on pages 534-535, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4039.4.3, http://zenodo.org/record/244946

Files

Files (3.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:136160c5ba3c09edc8ebe15eb9284d90
3.7 kB Download

System files (32.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:660149b1c45407469586675358ac6c17
32.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Braconidae
Genus
Protomicroplitis
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Hymenoptera
Phylum
Arthropoda
Taxon rank
genus

References

  • Ashmead, W. H. (1898) Part 2. Descriptions of new parasitic Hymenoptera. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 4, 155 - 171.
  • Ashmead, W. H. (1900 b) Classification of the Ichneumon flies, or the superfamily Ichneumonoidea. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 23 (1206), 1 - 220.
  • Ashmead, W. H. (1900 a) Report upon the Aculeate Hymenoptera of the islands of St. Vincent and Grenada, with additions to the parasitic Hymenoptera and a list of the described Hymenoptera of the West Indies. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1900, 207 - 367.
  • Viereck, H. L. (1914) Type species of the genera of Ichneumon flies. United States National Museum Bulletin, No. 83, 1 - 186.
  • Muesebeck, C. F. W. (1922) A revision of the North American ichneumon-flies, belonging to the subfamilies Neoneurinae and Microgasterinae. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 61 (2436), 1 - 76. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00963801.61 - 2436.1
  • Nixon, G. (1965) A reclassification of the tribe Microgasterini (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology Series, 2 (Supplement), 1 - 284.
  • Mason, W. R. M. (1981) The polyphyletic nature of Apanteles Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): A phylogeny and reclassification of Microgastrinae. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, Ottawa, 147 pp.