Published December 31, 2015 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Debroyerella fougneri Walker 1903

Description

Debroyerella fougneri (Walker, 1903)

Cheirimedon fougneri Walker, 1903: 41, pl. 7, figs 1–6.— Stebbing, 1906: 720.— Nicholls, 1938: 23 (in part, part = C. similis).— Shoemaker, 1945: 289 (in part, part = C. similis).— J.L. Barnard, 1958: 90.— Emison, 1968: 203, fig. 10, tables 10, 12 (ecology).— J.L. Barnard, 1969: 314.— Thurston & Allen, 1969: 357.— Bellan-Santini, 1972b: 689, pls 6, 7.— Arnaud, 1974: 572, 648.— Thurston, 1974: 50, figs 17, 18, 19a–e, table 1.— Lowry & Bullock, 1976: 86.— De Broyer, 1983: 182.— Barnard & Karaman, 1991: 475.— Klages, 1991: 50.— De Broyer & Jażdżewski, 1993: 66.— Johnson et al., 2001: table 3.— La Mesa et al., 2004: 724, table 2 (ecology).— De Broyer et al. 2007: 137.

not Cheirimedon fougneri. Walker, 1907: 9.— Schellenberg, 1926: 263, fig. 13.— K.H. Barnard, 1930: 326. (= C. similis).

Types. Syntypes, NHM 1903: 10:15: 13–15 (9 specimens in alcohol + 11 slides).

Type locality. Ross Sea (78°35'S), surface.

Description. Head, lateral cephalic lobe rounded; eyes reniform. Antenna 1 peduncular article 1 without anterodistal lobe; accessory flagellum with an elongate article 1 (at least twice as long as article 2) partially covering callynophore, 5-articulate; primary flagellum with weak 1-field callynophore, or without callynophore; robust setae absent from proximal articles; calceoli absent. Antenna 2 peduncular article 3 short; articles 3 to 5 not enlarged, brush setae present; calceoli absent. Labrum (epistome and upper lip) separate; epistome produced equally with upper lip, straight; upper lip not produced. Mandible molar an asymmetrically reduced column, proximally setose, distally triturating; left lacinia mobilis a long, slender robust seta. Maxilla 1 outer plate setalteeth in a well-developed 7/4 crown arrangement; palp distal margin with apical robust setae. Maxilla 2 inner plate significantly shorter than outer plate. Maxilliped outer plate with 2 long (one slender, one broad) apical robust setae.

Gnathopod 1 coxa large, about as long as coxa 2, subrectangular with slightly concave anterior margin, slightly expanded distally; basis without setae along anterior margin; ischium short; propodus large, margins subparallel, palm slightly acute, entire, subtly sinusoidal, with small, irregular serrations; dactylus simple. Gnathopod 2 subchelate; propodus palm transverse to slightly obtuse, slightly concave; dactylus fitting palm. Pereopod 4 coxa with a well-developed posteroventral lobe. Pereopod 5 coxa about as long as broad, posterior lobe slightly produced; basis longer than broad, posterior margin weakly serrate; carpus 4 × longer than wide; propodus 5 × longer than wide. Pereopod 6 carpus 4 × longer than wide; propodus 5 × longer than wide. Pereopod 7 basis posterior margin evenly rounded, posterodistally produced less than halfway along merus; carpus 4 × longer than wide; propodus 4 × longer than wide.

Epimeron 3 posterior margin smooth or very minutely serrate distally, posteroventral corner forming small, weak spine. Urosomite 1 not projecting over urosomite 2, with anterodorsal notch and slightly rounded boss.

Uropod 2 inner ramus without constriction. Uropod 3 inner ramus two-thirds as long as outer ramus; outer ramus article 2 short, with plumose setae on both rami. Telson distinctly longer than broad (length 1.4 × width), cleft to 35% of length, without dorsal robust setae, with 1 apical robust seta on each lobe.

Male (sexually dimorphic characters). Calceoli present on antennae 1 and 2.

Depth range. 0 m, surface (De Broyer et al. 2007).

Remarks. The variation of character states between the three currently described species of Debroyerella gen. sp. nov. is extremely subtle, and the species are morphologically very similar. Debroyerella fougneri is distinguished from D. similis (Thurston, 1974) by the broader and more distally expanded gnathopod 1 coxa, the shallower coxa of pereopod 5 and the longer and more weakly cleft telson. The same species can be separated from D. solidus (Andres, 1986) by the less convex and more sinuous palm of gnathopod 1, and the longer and more slender carpus and propodus of pereopods 5–7.

Distribution. Antarctica. Adélie Coast (Nicholls 1938); Palmer Archipelago (Shoemaker 1945); Shackleton Glacier (Nicholls 1938); Ross Sea (Shoemaker 1945, La Mesa et al. 2004); Weddell Sea (Klages 1991); Davis Sea (Johnson et al. 2001).

Notes

Published as part of Lowry, J. K. & Kilgallen, N. M., 2015, Debroyerella gen. nov. and Ulladulla gen. nov., two new lysianassoid genera (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Lysianassoidea), pp. 153-162 in Zootaxa 3920 (1) on pages 154-155, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3920.1.7, http://zenodo.org/record/231901

Files

Files (5.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:67f9b59fcd371deeef3ee7598727bb62
5.2 kB Download

System files (26.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:52ef51ecda44c0cca93c5ed18c925979
26.4 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Uristidae
Genus
Debroyerella
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Walker
Species
fougneri
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Debroyerella fougneri Walker, 1903 sec. Lowry & Kilgallen, 2015

References

  • Walker, A. O. (1903) Amphipoda of the ' Southern Cross' Antarctic Expedition. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 29, 38 - 64, pls. 37 - 11.
  • Stebbing, T. R. R. (1906) Amphipoda. I. Gammaridea. Das Tierreich, 21, 1 - 806.
  • Nicholls, G. E. (1938) Amphipoda, Gammaridea. Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911 - 14, Scientific Reports, Series C, 2, 1 - 145.
  • Shoemaker, C. R. (1945) Amphipoda of the United States Antarctic Service Expedition 1939 - 1941. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 89, 289 - 293.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1958) Index to the families, genera, and species of the gammaridean Amphipoda (Crustacea). Allan Hancock Foundation Publications, Occasional Paper, 19, 1 - 145.
  • Emison, W. B. (1968) Feeding preferences of the Adelie Penguin at Cape Crozier, Ross Island. Antarctic Research Series, 12, 191 - 212.
  • Barnard, J. L. (1969) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 271, 1 - 535. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 03629236.258.1
  • Thurston, M. H. & Allen, E. (1969) Type material of the families Lysianassidae, Stegocephalidae, Ampeliscidae and Haustoriidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in the collections of the British Museum (Natural History). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Series Zoology, 17, 347 - 388.
  • Bellan-Santini, D. (1972) Amphipodes provenant des contenus stomacaux de trois especes de poissons Nototheniidae recoltes en Terre Adelie (Antarctique). Tethys, 4, 683 - 702.
  • Arnaud, P. M. (1974) Contribution a la bionomie marine benthique des regions antarctiques et subantarctiques. Tethys, 6, 465 - 656.
  • Thurston, M. H. (1974) Crustacea Amphipoda from Graham Land and the Scotia Arc, collected by Operation Tabarin and the Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey, 1944 - 59. British Antarctic Survey Scientific Reports, 85, 1 - 89.
  • Lowry, J. K. & Bullock, S. (1976) Catalogue of the marine gammaridean Amphipoda of the Southern Ocean. Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin, 16, 1 - 187.
  • De Broyer, C. (1983) Recherches sur la systematique et l'evolution des crustaces amphipodes gammarides antarctiques et subantarctiques. PhD Thesis, Universite de Louvain, 468 pp.
  • Barnard, J. L. & Karaman, G. S. (1991) The families and genera of marine gammaridean Amphipoda (except marine gammaroids). Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement 13, 1 - 866. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0812 - 7387.13.1991.91
  • Klages, M. (1991) Biologische und populationsdynamische Untersuchungen an ausgewahlten Gammariden (Crustacea; Amphipoda) des sudostlichen Weddelsmeeres, Antarktis. PhD Thesis, Naturwissenschaften, Universitat Bremen, 240 pp.
  • De Broyer, C. & Jazdzewski, K. (1993) Contribution to the marine biodiversity inventory. A checklist of the Amphipoda (Crustacea) of the Southern Ocean. Documents de Travail de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 73, 1 - 154.
  • Johnson, W. S., Stevens, M. & Watling, L. (2001) Reproduction and development of marine peracaridans. Advances in Marine Biology, 39, 105 - 260. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / S 0065 - 2881 (01) 39009 - 0
  • La Mesa, M., Salu, M. & Vacchi, M. (2004) Trophic ecology of the emerald notothen Trematomus bernacchii (Pisces, Nototheniidae) from Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 27, 721 - 728. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1007 / s 00300 - 004 - 0645 - x
  • De Broyer, C., Lowry, J., Jazdzewski, K. & Robert, H. (2007) Catalogue of the Gammaridean and Corophiidean Amphipoda (Crustacea) of the Southern Ocean with distribution and ecological data. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Biologie, 11 (Supplement 1), 1 - 325
  • Walker, A. O. (1907) Crustacea III. - Amphipoda. National Antarctic Expedition 1901 - 1904, Natural History, 3, 1 - 38, pls. 31 - 13.
  • Schellenberg, A. (1926) Die Gammariden der Deutschen Sudpolar-Expedition 1901 - 1903. Deutsche Sudpolar-Expedition, 18, 235 - 414.
  • Barnard, K. H. (1930) Crustacea. Part XI. - Amphipoda. British Antarctic (" Terra Nova ") Expedition, 1910, Natural History Reports, Zoology, 8, 307 - 454.
  • Types. Syntypes, NHM 1903: 10: 15: 13 - 15 (9 specimens in alcohol + 11 slides).
  • Andres, H. G. (1986) Atylopsis procerus sp. n. und Cheirimedon solidus sp. n. aus der Weddell See sowie Anmerkungen zu Orchomenella pinguides Walker, 1903. (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Gammaridea). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut, 83, 117 - 130.