Published December 31, 2016 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Biflustra marcusi Vieira, Almeida & Winston, 2016, n. sp.

Description

Biflustra marcusi n. sp.

(Figs. 12–14)

Acanthodesia savartii: Marcus, 1937: 40, pl. 7, figs. 16A–C. [Brazil: São Paulo] Non Flustra savartii Audouin, 1826. [Egypt]

Acanthodesia savartii: Marcus, 1938: pl. 14, fig. 36. [Brazil: São Paulo] Acanthodesia savartii: Marcus, 1941: 17, fig. 8. [Brazil: Paraná]

Acanthodesia savartii: Marcus, 1955: 280. [Brazil: Espírito Santo]

? Acanthodesia savartii: Osburn, 1940: 352, pl. 2, figs. 16–17. [Puerto Rico] Biflustra savartii: Vieira et al., 2008: 13. [Brazil: Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Paraná]

Material examined. Holotype: UFPE 0 91, Pratagy (Sereia), Maceió, Alagoas State, Brazil, 9º33'55" S, 35º38'40" W; intertidal, on algae, Sargassum spp., coll. 0 7 September 2007 by A.G.A. Borba Jr. Paratypes: UFBA 1597, UFPE 0 56, UFPE 0 57, same data as holotype. UFPE 0 59, Riacho Doce, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil, 9º34'42" S, 35º39'19" W, intertidal, on algae, Sargassum spp., coll. 31 March 2007 by L.M. Vieira; UFBA 1599, Sobral sewer outfall, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil, 9º40'45" S, 35º45'01" W, intertidal, erect colony on hydroids, coll. 21 October 2009 by L.M. Vieira & M.D. Correia. Additional specimens: UFPE 114, Jatiúca, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil, 9º39'10" S, 35º41'40" W, intertidal, on algae, Sargassum spp., coll. 0 9 September 2003 by L.M. Vieira.

Diagnosis. Biflustra with encrusting colonies, unilaminar, multiserial, with cryptocyst surrounding almost entire opesia length, shorter laterally than proximally, with proximo-medial plate with triangular spines projecting into the opesia and two sharp curved denticles placed laterodistally at the cryptocyst. Distal transverse walls with a row of uniporous mural septula; lateral walls with two pairs of multiporous mural septula.

Description. Colony white, encrusting, unilaminar, multiserial. Zooids rectangular to hexagonal, 0.371–0.463 mm (0.424 ± 0.027) long and 0.235–0.346 mm (0.287 ± 0.027) wide, distal end rounded and proximal margins straight to concave. Lateral walls slightly raised and thin, without uncalcified bands; proximal corners often developed into raised and rounded gymnocystal tubercles with triangular bases. Cryptocyst surrounding almost all opesia length, shorter laterally than proximally; proximal cryptocyst slightly convex and granulose, a proximomedial plate with sharped triangular spines projecting into the membranous part of the frontal surface; two sharp and slightly curved denticles placed laterodistally, projecting obliquely toward to the midline of opesia. Opesia occupying about half of zooid length. Operculum with lightly sclerotized outer rim, 0.080–0.093 mm (0.086 ± 0.004) long and 0.099–0.117 mm (0.105 ± 0.006) wide. Distal transverse walls with a row of uniporous mural septula near to the basal wall; lateral transverse walls with two pairs of multiporous mural septula. Colonies formed by a twinned ancestrula.

Etymology. Named after Ernst Marcus (1893–1968), for his contributions to bryozoology.

Remarks. The type of Biflustra d’Orbigny, 1852, Biflustra ramosa d’Orbigny, 1852 (Grischenko et al. 2002: fig. 2; Tilbrook 2006: pl. 2A), has erect vincularian colonies and no ancestrula has been described or figured. There are, however, many interpretations for the usage of the genus Biflustra (e.g. Tilbrook 2006; Taylor & Tan 2015), with morphologically related species sometimes being assigned to distinct genera— e.g. Biflustra arborescens (Canu & Bassler, 1928b) and Acanthodesia irregulata (Liu, 1992) —due to the absence of information on ancestrula type. To avoid the usage of two generic names for morphologically related species, here we disagree with Taylor & Tan (2015) who assigned some species to the genus Acanthodesia Canu & Bassler, 1919 rather than Biflustra d’Orbigny, 1852 based on the presence of a twinned ancestrula and encrusting colonies. We believe that skeletal characters are useful to distinguish some problems in Membraniporidae, but due to the simplicity of external morphology, only a more complete knowledge of ancestrual formation and astogeny and/or results of molecular studies will clarify the use of Acanthodesia and Biflustra.

At least two species of Membraniporidae, Biflustra savartii (Audouin, 1826) and Biflustra tenuis (Desor, 1848) have been reported as widespread (e.g. Harmer 1926; Marcus 1937; Osburn 1940; Maturo 1957; Winston 1982; Winston 2005; Winston & Hayward, 2012). Some of these records, however, may also refer to different species, including Biflustra ramosa (d’Orbigny, 1852) (see Tilbrook 2006). The illustrations of Flustra savartii from Egypt (Savigny 1817: pl. 10, figs. 10.1, 10.2), type species of Acanthodesia, do not show the proximomedial denticle in the cryptocyst that is seen in syntype specimens of B. ramosa, type of Biflustra, and Biflustra crenulata (Okada, 1923). SEM images of putative B. savartii from the Northern Bay of Safaga (Ostrovsky et al. 2011, 2016), however, show autozooids without gymnocystal tubercles, and a short proximomedial cryptocystal denticle (present in some zooids). Biflustra marcusi n. sp. is distinguished from B. savartii, B. crenulata and B. ramosa, however, in having encrusting colonies; by the shape and size of the proximomedial denticle of cryptocyst, occupying 40–60% of the opesia width; and by the presence of two distolateral denticles directed medially to the opesia.

Marcus (1937) illustrated similar zooids in specimens reported as Acanthodesia tenuis (Marcus 1937: pl. 8, fig. 17B)—assigned to Biflustra denticulata (Busk, 1856) by Vieira et al. (2008), but identical to B. tenuis (sensu Winston & Hayward 2012, as Membranipora)—and A. savartii (sensu Marcus 1937: pl. 7, figs. 16A–C). Acanthodesia savartii sensu Marcus (1937) is here reassigned to B. marcusi n. sp. Rounded tubercles at proximal corners of zooids are often present in specimens of B. tenuis from Brazil, while these tubercles are often present in younger colonies of B. marcusi n. sp. from Alagoas. Specimens from Brazil of B. tenuis have cryptocyst with some denticles projecting into the opesia, without a proximomedial plate. In two other species reported from Brazil, B. arborescens and Biflustra paulensis (Marcus, 1937), the proximomedial cryptocystidial plate is absent. Specimens from Gulf of Mexico reported as A. savartii by Osburn (1940) resemble B. marcusi n. sp., being distinguished only by the absence of distolateral denticles directed toward the midline of the opesia; these specimens may be conspecific.

Specimens reported as Acanthodesia serrata Hincks, 1882 by Marcus (1937, p. 44, pl. 8, fig. 8) have developed cryptocyst, thus are distinct from Membranipora membranacea form serrata described by Hincks (1882) (= Membranipora villosa Hincks, 1880). Membranipora villosa is attributed to the Membranipora “membranacea-serrimella-villosa” morphs, known from NE Pacific (see Dick et al. 2005, p. 3692). Acanthodesia serrata studied by Marcus resembles those specimens figured by Hastings (1930, p. 707, pl. 4, figs. 13–15), but its identity remains uncertain. Specimens identified as Conopeum commensale Kirkpatrick & Metzelaar, 1922 by Marcus (1937) have spinules on frontal membrane, and they belong to B. arborescens.

Biflustra falsitenuis (Liu, 1992), described from China, also has a proximomedial cryptocystal plate with spines, but it is distinguished by having two large multiporous pore chambers in the transversal wall and in the absence of the two distal lateral denticles (see Liu et al. 2001: pl. 9, fig. 2), characteristic of B. marcusi n. sp.

Distribution. Biflustra marcusi n. sp. is often found encrusting algae. In Brazil, this species occurs at least from Alagoas to Paraná.

Other

Published as part of Vieira, Leandro M., Almeida, Ana C. S. & Winston, Judith E., 2016, Taxonomy of intertidal cheilostome Bryozoa of Maceió, northeastern Brazil. Part 1: Suborders Inovicellina, Malacostegina and Thalamoporellina, pp. 59-83 in Zootaxa 4097 (1) on pages 66-68, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4097.1.3, http://zenodo.org/record/271017

Files

Files (8.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9153fbbe41962365ca3e29014ac868c0
8.9 kB Download

System files (52.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:af1965c78c40a83b091c9ebb74757355
52.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Membraniporidae
Genus
Biflustra
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Cheilostomatida
Phylum
Bryozoa
Species
marcusi
Taxonomic status
sp. nov.
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Biflustra marcusi Vieira, Almeida & Winston, 2016

References

  • Marcus, E. (1937) Bryozoarios Marinhos Brasileiros, 1. Boletim da Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciencias e Letras da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Zoologia, 1, 5 - 224.
  • Audouin, J. V. (1826) Explication sommaire des planches de Polypes de l'Egypte et de la Syrie, publiees par Jules-Cesar Savigny. In: Panckoucke, C. L. F. (Org.), Description de l'Egypte ou recueil des observations et des recherches qui ont ete faites en Egypte pendant l'Expedition de l'Armee francaise. Histoire naturelle. Tome 1 (4). Imprimerie Imperiale, Paris, pp. 225 - 244.
  • Marcus, E. (1938) Bryozoarios Marinhos Brasileiros, 2. Boletim da Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciencias e Letras da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Zoologia, 2, 1 - 196.
  • Marcus, E. (1941) Briozoarios Marinhos do Litoral Paranaense. Arquivos do Museu Paranaense, 1 (1), 7 - 36.
  • Marcus, E. (1955) Notas Sobre Briozoos Marinhos Brasileiros. Arquivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, 42 (1), 273 - 341.
  • Osburn, R. C. (1940) Bryozoa of Porto Rico with a resume of West Indian Bryozoan fauna. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands, 16, 321 - 486.
  • Vieira, L. M., Migotto, A. E. & Winston, J. E. (2008) Synopsis and annotated checklist of recent marine Bryozoa from Brazil. Zootaxa, 1810, 1 - 39.
  • Grischenko, A. V., Taylor, P. D. & Mawatari, S. F. (2002) A new cheilostome bryozoan with gigantic zooids from the North-West Pacific. Zoological Science, 19, 1279 - 1289. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.2108 / zsj. 19.1279
  • Tilbrook, K. J. (2006) Cheilostomatous Bryozoa from the Solomon Islands. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Monographs, Studies in Biodiversity Number 3, 4, 1 - 385.
  • Taylor, P. D. & Tan, S. - G. A. (2015) Cheilostome Bryozoa from Penang and Langkawi, Malaysia. European Journal of Taxonomy, 149, 1 - 34.
  • Canu, F. & Bassler, R. S. (1928 b) Les bryozoaires du Maroc et de Mauritanie, 2 me memoire. Memoires de la Societe des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc, 18, 1 - 85.
  • Liu, X (1992) On the genus Membranipora (Anasca: Cheilostomata) from South Chinese Seas. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 40 (1), 103 - 144.
  • Canu, F. & Bassler, R. S. (1919) Fossil Bryozoa from the West Indies. Publications of the Carnegie Institution, 291, 75 - 102.
  • Desor, E. (1848) Ascidioidian polyps of Bryozoa (from Nantucket). Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 3, 66 - 67.
  • Harmer, S. F. (1926) The Polyzoa of the Siboga Expedition, 2. Cheilostomata Anasca. Siboga Expedition Reports, 28 (b), 183 - 501.
  • Maturo, F. J. S. (1957) A study of the Bryozoa of Beaufort, North Carolina, and vicinity. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society, 73, 11 - 68.
  • Winston, J. E. (1982) Marine bryozoans (Ectoprocta) of the Indian River area, Florida. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 173, 99 - 176.
  • Winston, J. E. (2005) Redescription and revision of Smitt's " Floridan Bryozoa " in the Collection of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University. Virginia Museum of Natural History Memoir, 7, 1 - 50.
  • Winston, J. E. & Hayward, P. J. (2012) The Marine Bryozoans of the Northeast Coast of the United States: Maine to Virginia. Virginia Museum of Natural History Memoir, 11 (I - XII), 1 - 180.
  • Savigny, J. C. (1817) Description de l'Egypte, ou recueil des observations et des recherches qui ont ete faites en Egypte pendant l'Expedition de L'Armee francaise. Histoire naturelle. Vol. 2. Imprimerie Royale, Paris, 125 pls.
  • Ostrovsky, A., Caceres-Chamizo, J. P., Vavra, N. & Berning, B. (2011) Bryozoa of the Red Sea: history and current state of research. In: Wyse Jackson, P. N. & Spencer Jones, M. E. (Eds.), Annals of Bryozoology 3: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans. International Bryozoology Association, Dublin, pp. 67 - 97.?
  • Ostrovsky, A., Caceres-Chamizo, J. P. & Vavra, N. (2016) Bryozoa collection from the Safaga Bay (North Red Sea), Departament of Paleontolopgy, University of Vienna, Vienna. Available from: https: // www. univie. ac. at / Palaeontologie / Sammlung / Bryozoa / Safaga _ Bay / Safaga _ Bay. html (accessed 26 February 2016)
  • Hincks T. (1882) Report of the Polyzoa on the Queen Charlotte Island. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5 (10), 459 - 471. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222938209459751
  • Hincks, T. (1880) Contributions towards a general history of the marine Polyzoa. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 5 (6), 376 - 384. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222938009458955
  • Dick, M. H., Grischenko, A. V. & Mawatari, S. F. (2005) Intertidal Bryozoa (Cheilostomata) of Ketchikan, Alaska. Journal of Natural History, 39 (43), 3687 - 3784.
  • Hastings, A. B. (1930) Cheilostomatous Polyzoa from the vicinity of the Panama Canal collected by Dr. A. Crossland on the cruise of the S. Y. " St George ". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 99 (4), 697 - 740. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.1929. tb 01453. x
  • Kirkpatrick, R. & Metzelaar, J. (1922) On an instance of commensalism between a hermit crab and a polyzoon. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1922, 983 - 990. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1469 - 7998.1992. tb 07093. x
  • Liu, X., Xueming, Y. & Jianghu, M. A. (2001) Biology of Marine Fouling Bryozoans in the coastal waters of China. Scince Press, Beijing, 860 pp.