Published December 31, 2016 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Bradophila Levinsen 1878

Creators

Description

Bradophila Levinsen, 1878

Levinsen (1878) proposed Bradophila for a new species, B. pygmaea, associated with the flabelligerid Brada villosa (Rathke, 1843). Although he recognized a certain resemblance in gross body morphology with Herpyllobius Steenstrup & Lütken, 1861 the difference in the point of origin of the connecting stalk was considered sufficient evidence for maintaining generic distinctiveness. The systematic position of Bradophila has been considered dubious for a long time. Hansen (1892) proposed the family Herpyllobiidae in which he included Herpyllobius, Eurysilenium M. Sars, 1870, Rhizorhina Hansen, 1892, and with considerable probability Saccopsis Levinsen, 1878 and Bradophila, not improbably Trophoniphila and possibly Oestrella. This classification was largely adopted by Haddon (1912). Applying his own descriptive terminology for the Herpyllobiidae to B. pygmaea, Leigh-Sharpe (1926) interpreted the collar-shaped, highly sclerotized anterior part of the ectosoma as the head and described it as having “symmetrically arranged fleshy excrescences with two lateral serrate horns”. In reality, the paired excrescences figured by Levinsen represent an optical section through the circular holdfast and the “serrate horns” are not part of the parasite but correspond to torn host integument or tissue located around the point of entry. Levinsen (1878) himself assumed that they were a continuation of the stalk, probably representing the remnants of the anterior, unknown part (endosoma) of a similar structure as seen in Herpyllobius. Leigh-Sharpe (1926) pointed out the presence of two spherical processes (as in Phallusiella Leigh-Sharpe, 1926) and a small median process (as in Eurysilenium) on the ectosoma but nevertheless excluded Bradophila from the Herpyllobiidae primarily because the “... head and neck are not perpendicular to the trunk”. Delamare-Deboutteville & Laubier (1960b) nevertheless continued listing Bradophila as a member of the Herpyllobiidae. Lützen (1964) showed that in herpyllobiids the stalk (neck) issued from a point on the midline of the underside of the ectosoma with which it usually forms a right angle. He excluded Bradophila from the Herpyllobiidae without suggesting an alternative placement for it; however, Monod & Laubier (1996) continued to treat the genus as a member of this family. Marchenkov (1997) initially listed B. pygmaea as incertae sedis in the Siphonostomatoida before designating it as the type of a new family in the Poecilostomatoida (Marchenkov 2002). Boxshall & Halsey (2004) placed the Bradophilidae in a more inclusive Cyclopoida.

Notes

Published as part of Huys, Rony, 2016, Enigmas from the past: M'Intosh's (1885) annelidicolous copepods from the voyage of H. M. S. Challenger, pp. 355-385 in Zootaxa 4174 (1) on page 371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4174.1.22, http://zenodo.org/record/262257

Files

Files (3.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f2f737ac47dd788b9b64422ac4507f1b
3.1 kB Download

System files (19.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0cb1474f1d895eddb07e0b5cde5a6ae5
19.0 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Bradophilidae
Genus
Bradophila
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Poecilostomatoida
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Levinsen
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Bradophila Levinsen, 1878 sec. Huys, 2016

References

  • Levinsen, G. M. R. (1878) Om nogle parasitiske Krebsdyr, der snylte hos Annelider. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra den naturhistoriske Forening i Kjobenhavn, 1877 - 1878, 351 - 380, plate 6.
  • Rathke, H. (1843) Beitrage zur Fauna Norwegens. Novorum Actorum Academiae caesareae leopoldino-carolinae naturae curiosorum, 20, 1 - 264 c, plates I - XII.
  • Steenstrup, J. J. S. & Lutken, C. F. (1861) Bidrag til Kundskab om det aabne Havs Snyltekrebs og Lernaeer samt om nogle andre nye eller hidtil kun ufuldstaendigt kjendte parasitiske Copepoder. Det Kongelige Danske videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter. Naturvidenskabelig og mathematisk Afdeling, Series 5, 5, 341 - 432, plates 1 - 15.
  • Hansen, H. J. (1892) Rhizorhina Ampeliscae n. gen., n. sp. En ny til Herpyllobiidae, n. fam., horende Copepod, snyltende paa Amp. laevigata Lilljb. Entomologiske Meddelelser, 3, 207 - 234, plate III.
  • Sars, M. (1870) VII. Bidrag til Kundskab om Christianiafjordens Fauna. II. Crustacea. Beskrivelse af nye, paa annelider snyltende Copepodeformer. Nyt Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne, 17 (2), 113 - 160, plates 8 - 10.
  • Haddon, K. (1912) Herpyllobius arcticus. Quarterly Journal of microscopical Science, new series, 58, 385 - 410.
  • Leigh-Sharpe, W. H. (1926) The Herpyllobiidae. A family of Copepoda parasitic on polynoid worms. Parasitology, 18, 269 - 276. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0031182000005254
  • Delamare-Deboutteville, C. & Laubier, L. (1960 b) Les Phyllocolidae Delamare et Laubier, Copepodes parasites d'Annelides Polychetes Phyllodocides, et leur rapports avec les Copepodes annelidicoles. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, 251, 2231 - 2233.
  • Lutzen, J. (1964) A revision of the family Herpyllobiidae (parasitic copepods) with notes on hosts and distribution. Ophelia, 1, 241 - 274. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1080 / 00785326.1964.10416282
  • Monod, T. & Laubier, L. (1996) Les Crustaces dans la Biosphere. Traite de Zoologie. Anatomie, Systematique, Biologie. Tome VII. Crustaces. Fascicule 2. Generalites (suite) et Systematique. Masson, Paris, 76 pp. [pp. 90 - 166]
  • Marchenkov, A. V. (1997) Fauna of symbiotic and parasitic crustaceans (Copepoda, Isopoda, Cirripedia, Amphipoda) from the benthic invertebrates of the White Sea and Arctic Seas. Parazitologija, 31, 24 - 44. [in Russian with English summary]
  • Marchenkov, A. V. (2002) Bradophilidae fam. nov. - the new family of mesoparasitic copepod collected from the polychaete Brada villosa from the White Sea. Parazitologiya, 36, 514 - 516. [in Russian with English summary]
  • Boxshall, G. A. & Halsey, H. S. (2004) An Introduction to Copepod Diversity. The Ray Society, London, xv + 966 pp.