Published December 31, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Haemogamasus Berlese 1889

Description

Genus Haemogamasus Berlese, 1889

Haemogamasus Berlese, 1889: 2.

Dermanyssus Dugès, 1834: 18, partim.

Hypoaspis G. Canestrini, 1884: 1569, partim. Euhaemogamasus Ewing, 1933: 3.

Groschaftella Přívora & Samšiňák, 1957: 270. Terasterna Zhou, Gu & Wen, 1995: 172, 175.

Type species: Haemogamasus hirsutus Berlese, 1889.

General morphological diagnosis: see Kim et al. (1987), Mašán & Fend’a (2010: 71).

Remarks. The genus was established by Berlese (1889) to include the single species, Hg. hirsutus from the European mole (Fig. 1). This species has not been found in Asiatic Russia although numerous recordings of Hg. hirsutus from the European part of the former USSR are known (Nikulina, 2004). The most important taxonomic works on the genus are those by Vitzthum (1930), Bregetova (1949, 1956a), Keegan (1951), Evans & Till (1966), Allred (1969), Williams et al. (1978), Haitlinger (1988), and Lundquist (1990). The species of the genus were thought to inhabit all continents, except South America (Bregetova, 1956a; Williams et al., 1978; Lundquist, 1990), but later records of Haemogamasus from Argentina and Chile have now been published (Mosquera, 1988; Casanueva et al., 1994; Herrin & Sage, 2012). The genus includes about 60 species, 12 of which have been recorded in Europe (Mašán & Fend’a, 2010) and nearly 30 species in the former USSR (Senotrusova, 1987; Goncharova et al., 1991). One of these species, Hg. pontiger (Berlese, 1904), is of almost cosmopolitan distribution, being recorded from the Old World, the Americas, Antarctica and Australia (Lundquist, 1990; Halliday, 2011). Ecologically, most species of Haemogamasus are parasites of small mammals and abundant in their hosts’ nests and shelters (Balashov, 2009). In general, these mites are opportunistic parasites able to exploit a wide range of host species (Bregetova, 1949); some of them were collected also from birds and birds’ nests (Haitlinger, 1988; Gwaizdowicz et al., 2006). Strict host specificity in the genus is rarely observed (Bregetova & Nel’zina, 1952). Some taxa (Hg. pontiger) are regarded as predators (Halliday, 2011), and their relationships with Micromammalia are rather indirect. The role of different Haemogamasus species as vectors of viruses and other pathogenic microorganisms has been elucidated by many authors (Zemskaya, 1973; Yakimenko et al., 2000; Valiente Moro et al., 2005; Žákovská et al., 2008; Mi’tkova et al., 2015).

Notes

Published as part of Vinarski, Maxim V. & Korallo-Vinarskaya, Natalia P., 2017, An annotated catalogue of the gamasid mites associated with small mammals in Asiatic Russia. The family Haemogamasidae (Acari: Mesostigmata: Gamasina), pp. 1-18 in Zootaxa 4273 (1) on page 4, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4273.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/818303

Files

Files (3.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e4e772a321eff3cb2c9503d90500d4ab
3.1 kB Download

System files (31.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a71eebddb617c03743ccf3d3bf06a5ff
31.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
USSR
Family
Laelapidae
Genus
Haemogamasus
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Mesostigmata
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Berlese
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Haemogamasus Berlese, 1889 sec. Vinarski & Korallo-Vinarskaya, 2017

References

  • Berlese, A. (1889) Acari, Myriopoda et Scorpiones hucusque in Italia reperta. Tipografia del Seminario, Padova, 52 pp.
  • Duges, A. L. (1834) Recherches sur l'ordre des Acariens en general et la famille des Trombidies en particulier. Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Zoologie, 2 (1), 5 - 46.
  • Canestrini, G (1884) Prospetto dell'acarofauna Italiana. Atti del Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, Series 6, 2, 1563 - 1607.
  • Ewing, H. E. (1933) New genera and species of parasitic mites of the superfamily Parasitoidea. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 2971, 1 - 14.
  • Privora, M. & Samsinak, K. (1957) Zastupce celede Haemogamasidae jako parasit cloveka a nekolik noznamek k systematice teto celede. Ceskoslovenska Parasitologie, 4, 267 - 274.
  • Zhou, M. - S., Gu, Y. M. & Wen, T. H. (1995) Mites of the Haemogamasidae in China with description of a new genus (Acari: Parasitiformes). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 20 (2), 172 - 175.
  • Kim, M. H., Lee, H. P. & Noh, J. T. (1987) Study of laelaptid mites parasitising rodents in Korea. III. Mites of the genus Haemogamasus Berlese, 1889 (Acari: Mesostigmata). Korean Arachnology, 3 (1), 35 - 44.
  • Nikulina, N. A. (2004) A catalogue of parasitic Gamasina mites of mammals of Northern Eurasia (Russia). Aktsioner & Co, Saint-Petersburg, 170 pp. [in Russian]
  • Vitzthum, H. (1930) Milben als Pesttrager? Zoologischer Jahrbucher. Abteilung fur Systematik, Okologie und Geographie der Tiere, 60, 381 - 428.
  • Bregetova, N. G. (1949) Materials on the fauna of mites of the family Haemogamasidae. Parazitologicheskiy sbornik Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, 11, 161 - 185. [in Russian]
  • Bregetova, N. G. (1956 a) Gamasid mites (Gamasoidea). Opredeliteli po faune SSSR, izdavaemye Zoologicheskim Institutom Akademii Nauk SSSR, 61, 1 - 247. [in Russian]
  • Keegan, H. L. (1951) The mites of the subfamily Haemogamasinae (Acari: Laelaptidae). Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 101, 203 - 268.
  • Evans, G. O. & Till, W. M. (1966) Studies on the British Dermanyssidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Part II. Classification. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology, 14, 107 - 370.
  • Allred, D. M. (1969) Haemogamasid mites of Eastern Asia and Western Pacific with a key to species. Journal of Medical Entomology, 6, 103 - 108.
  • Williams, G. L., Smiley, R. L. & Redington, B. C. (1978) A taxonomic study of the genus Haemogamasus in North America, with descriptions of two new species (Acari: Mesostigmata, Laelaptidae). International Journal of Acarology, 4, 235 - 273. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 01647957808683122
  • Haitlinger, R. (1988) Haemogamasidae Oudemans, 1926 (Acari, Mesostigmata) of Poland. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 58, 635 - 662.
  • Lundquist, L. (1990) Taxonomic and functional significance of the presternal area in Haemogamasus mites (Acari- Mesostigmata: Laelaptidae), with a revised key to Fennoscandian species. Entomologia Scandinavia, 21, 329 - 337. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 187631290 X 00256
  • Mosquera, S. (1988) Eucheyletia hardyi Baker, 1949 y Haemogamasus pontiger (Berlese, 1904), dos acaros nuevos para la fauna Argentina. Neotropica, 34, 73 - 76.
  • Casanueva, M. E., Berrios, A. M., Peredo, A. A. A. & Martinez, R. I. (1994) Mites associated on horses stables I. Androlaelaps casalis (Berlese), Haemogamasus horridus Michael and Proctolaelaps pygmaeus (Muller), the first record for Chile and redescription of the male (Acari: Mesostigmata). Gayana Zoologia, 58, 61 - 69.
  • Herrin, C. S. & Sage, R. D. (2012) Description of a new species of Haemogamasus (Mesostigmata, Laelapidae, Haemogamasinae) from Chubut, Rio Negro and Neuquen Provinces, Argentina. Zookeys, 173, 51 - 77. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 173.1592
  • Senotrusova, V. G. (1987) Gamasid mites - parasites of wild animals in Kazakhstan. Nauka, Alma-Ata, 224 pp. [in Russian]
  • Goncharova, A. A., Bondarchuk, A. S. & Vershinina, O. N. (1991) Gamasid mites - Ectoparasites of Mammals in Transbaikalia. Chita State Medical University, Chita, 121 pp. [in Russian]
  • Halliday, B. (2011) Occurrence of the predatory mite Haemogamasus pontiger (Berlese) (Acari: Laelapidae) in Australia, with a review of its biology. Australian Journal of Entomology, 50, 61 - 64.
  • Balashov, Yu. S. (2009) Acari and Insect Parasitism on Terrestrial Vertebrates. Nauka Publishers, Saint-Petersburg, 358 pp. [in Russian]
  • Zemskaya, A. A. (1973) Parasitic Gamasid Mites and Their Medical Importance. Meditsina Publishing House, Moscow, 168 pp. [in Russian]
  • Yakimenko, V. V., Dekonenko, A. Ye., Mal'kova, M. G., Kuz'min, I. V., Tantsev, A. K., Dzagurova, T. K. & Tkachenko, Ye. A. (2000) Spread of hantaviruses in West Siberia. Meditsinskaya Parazitologiya i Parazitarnye Bolezni, 3, 21 - 28. [in Russian]
  • Valiente Moro, C., Chauve, C. & Zenner, L. (2005) Vectorial role of some dermanyssoid mites (Acari, Mesostigmata, Dermanyssoidea). Parasite, 12, 99 - 109.
  • Zakovska, A., Janouskovcova, E., Pejchalova, K., Halouzka, J. & Dendis, M. (2008) Identification and characterization of 31 isolates of Borrelia burgdorferi (Spirochaetales, Spirochaetaceae) obtained from various hosts and vectors using PCR- RFLP and SDS-PAGE analysis. Acta Parasitologica, 53, 186 - 192.