Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published January 29, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta) feeding ecology and selectivity of large herbivorous prey in the Namib Desert

  • 1. ,

Description

We have investigated the relationship between spotted hyaenas in the south Namib Desert and large herbivorous prey, and have summarized an updated overview of predator-prey relationships in this resource-limited arid environment. Over the 52-month study, we recorded the densities (#/km-2, + SE) of the four local large herbivorous prey species: gemsbok (1.229, + 0.50), springbok (1.352, + 0.48), ostrich (0.648, + 0.23), and greater kudu (0.343, + 0.00). A faecal analysis was performed on 146 collected spotted hyaena scats, and prey items were identified and hairs cross-follicle analysed to the species level. Spotted hyaena diet at the study area remained opportunistic with 240 identified prey items representing eight differing prey species being recorded, ranging from ostrich eggs to large ungulates. The Ivlev's Electivity Index was used to determine which large herbivorous prey was most selected for. Although gemsbok had a higher representation of prey items in the sampled scats, all sampled large herbivorous prey species scored below 0, and are thus generally avoided in relation to their availability in the environment. If any prey preferences are expressed by spotted hyaena in the Namib, it can be presumed to be a non-sampled prey species. We therefore promote further detailed investigations into all other prey species present, and seasonal variations of prey densities and scat sampling, within the study environment.

Notes

Due to limitations in available equipment, gravimetric consistencies of prey items per scat were not recorded. Scat was not collected on a seasonal basis, as scats of varying ages were sampled for this dataset. 

For the prey density dataset, greater kudu population data was not always consistantly available due to a low presence of the species during data collection.    

Files

Files (40.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ab83488935dcf1be7e4767284bb0cd89
19.2 kB Download
md5:79f10fd659629363ee082812b8199fc3
20.7 kB Download