Published July 29, 2021 | Version Linguistics
Conference paper Open

EXPERIMENTAL PHONETIC STUDY OF THE PARENTHETICAL CLAUSES

  • 1. PhD, Senior Lecturer

Description

This project investigates the structural representation of parentheticals in English, constructions which mark the topic of an utterance, and which exhibit some of the properties characteristic of parentheticals. For decades, linguists have deliberated over the structural representation of parenthetical constructions. Parenthetical phrases’ unrestricted distribution and sometimes extreme prosodic and semantic independence have led linguists to propose many novel theories for incorporating parentheticals into a modern grammar. Unfortunately, not only have these explanations often been cursory and vague, but parenthetical topics have not been addressed in previous studies.

In support of the unintegrated hypothesis, a simple way to impose a linear order on phonological material is proposed from those structures which are consistent with parenthetical phrases’ unrestricted distribution. One consequence of this proposal is the prediction that the introduction of focus can improve the acceptability of parentheticals. An online survey on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk was implemented to test this prediction using parenthetical topics speaking of and as for. The results of this study bear on the syntax of parentheticals in general, and it may be possible to apply this analysis to other kinds of parentheticals, including nominal appositives, full clausal parentheticals, reporting verbs like said, among others, which could lead to a more general account of parentheticals in English, or even cross-linguistically.

Files

EXPERIMENTAL PHONETIC STUDY OF THE PARENTHETICAL CLAUSES.pdf

Files (1.8 MB)

Additional details

References

  • 1. Daly, N. A., & Zue, V. W. (2016). Statistical and linguistic analyses of F0 in read and spontaneous speech. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) 92, 763-766.
  • 2. Fagyal, Z. (2018). Tonal template for background information: The scaling of pitch in utterance-medial parentheticals in French. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2018, 279-282. Retrieved February 2003 from http://www.lpl.univ-aix.fr/sp2018/pdf/fagyal.pdf
  • 3. Grosz, B., & Hirschberg, J. (2016). Some intonational charactersitics of discourse structure. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) 92, 429-432.
  • 4. Hunt, A. (2019). JSpeech Markup Language. Retrieved June 2018 from http://www.w3.org/TR/2019/N0TE-jsml-20190605
  • 5. Kutik, E, Cooper, W. E., & Boyce, S. (2019). Declination of fundamental frequency in speakers' production of parenthetical and main clauses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 1731-1738.
  • 6. Mohler, G., & Mayer, J. (2018). Pitch-range control based on discourse structure. Manuscript submitted for publication. Retrieved June 2018 from http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/phonetik/joerg/papers/JSpeechTech2018.pdf
  • 7. Nunberg, G. (2019). The linguistics of punctuation. (CSLI Lecture Notes 18). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
  • 8. Pierrehumbert, J. (2018). Synthesizing intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 985-995.
  • 9. Reed, C., & Long, D. (2018). Generating punctuation in written arguments. (Technical Report RN/97/157/). Department of Computer Science, University College, London, UK. Retrieved April 2018 from http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/reed97generating.html
  • 10. Tatham, M., & Lewis, E. (2018). Improving text-to-speech synthesis. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 35-42. Retrieved May 2018 from http://speech.essex.ac.uk/speech/archive/improvingss/MT-EL.html