Published March 3, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Open

To what degree is palliative care integrated in guidelines and pathways for adult cancer patients in Europe: a systematic literature review

  • 1. Department of Radiation-Oncology and Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
  • 2. International Observatory on End of Life Care, Division of Health Research Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
  • 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • 4. Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
  • 5. Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Navarra Hospital, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
  • 6. Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary

Description

Background: Palliative Care (PC) aims to improve the quality of life for patients with cancer and their families and its benefits have been demonstrated by several studies. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the integration of PC in the content of guidelines/pathways of adult cancer patients in Europe.

Methods: We included studies of adult patients with cancer published from 01/01/1995 and 31/12/2013 in Europe in six languages. We searched nine electronic databases, hand-searched six journals and also performed citation tracking. Studies were ranked using Emanuel’s Integrated Palliative Care (IPC) criteria, a tool containing 11 domains to assess PC content in guidelines. Two reviewers screened the results and narrative synthesis has been employed.

Results: We identified a total of 28,277 potentially relevant articles from which 637 were eligible for full-text screening. The final review included 60 guidelines and 14 pathways. Eighty percent (80 %) of the guidelines/pathways emphasize a holistic approach and 66 % focus on PC interventions aimed at reducing suffering. Fifty seven percent (57 %) did not discuss referral criteria for PC. Of all studies, five fulfilled at least 10/11 IPC criteria. Differences existed with regard to the referral criteria for bereavement care and the continuous adjustment of goals of care.

Conclusion: Overall, most of the identified guidelines/pathways highlighted the importance of the holistic approach of IPC. The studies that were found to fulfil at least 10/11 Emanuel’s IPC criteria could serve as benchmarks of IPC.

Files

12904_2016_Article_100.pdf

Files (759.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:446fb2126891235c9e3f717e73d5550d
741.1 kB Preview Download
md5:c524f57696fe410a3f867bcb6dcb8ae0
18.7 kB Download

Additional details

Funding

INSUP-C – Patient-centered palliative care pathways in advanced cancer and chronic disease 305555
European Commission