Published July 26, 2021 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Mecopoda confracta Liu 2020

  • 1. Grillenstieg 18, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
  • 2. Department of Electronic Engineering, University of York, York, YO 10 5 DD, United Kingdom & Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, SW 7 5 BD, United Kingdom.
  • 3. Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D- 53113, Bonn, Germany.
  • 4. Lomonosov Moscow State University; Leninskie Gory, 1, building 12, Moscow, 119234, Russia.
  • 5. Key Laboratory of the Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. iucx @ ioz. ac. cn; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 6313 - 196 X
  • 6. Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland. warchalowska @ isez. pan. krakow. pl; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 7812 - 1644

Description

Subgroup confracta Liu, 2020

According to Liu Cx et al. (2020), the species of this group „have mediate-width long tegmina, comparatively short files and the narrowest mirror. The file is widest in basal quarter, from which teeth are gradually narrower toward both ends. The songs are discontinuous and each song unit consists of numerous simple syllables“. The authors included the two newly described species Mecopoda confracta and M. synconfracta sp. n. (China), but listed also Mecopoda _“S” (Malaysia) with song and file data and Mecopoda _ “N” (Bali) (Sismondo 1990) as group members. In addition and based on file structure, they added an unidentified Mecopoda species from Vietnam and an otherwise undescribed ‚ Mecopoda elongata‘ from India. From song structure also the „chirper“ in Nityananda & Balakrishnan (2006) belongs to the group. In our material specimens with a ratio larger than 1.5 (length/width of mirror area) always belonged to the confracta subgroup.

Among this material there are at least three forms which differ clearly in song pattern from the previously described ones and from each other. Their songs differ mainly in three parameters, in echeme repetition rate (echeme period), in syllable repetition rate (syllable period) and in the number of syllables per echeme. For comparison, we present also data on the song of the Chinese species M. confracta (Tab. 4).

Concerning the structure of the stridulatory file,all species of the subgroup are relatively similar(Figs.11H–K, 12).

Notes

Published as part of Heller, Klaus-Gerhard, Baker, Ed, Ingrisch, Sigfrid, Korsunovskaya, Olga, Liu, Chun-Xiang, Riede, Klaus & Warchałowska-Šliwa, Elżbieta, 2021, Bioacoustics and systematics of Mecopoda (and related forms) from South East Asia and adjacent areas (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea, Mecopodinae) including some chromosome data, pp. 101-144 in Zootaxa 5005 (2) on page 125, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5005.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5141281

Files

Files (2.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9f7f9581fc2b3771b3ad6ebfe57bcb9f
2.0 kB Download

System files (14.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b5832a56b3cf7d937703c96847203a41
14.3 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Liu, C. - X., Heller, K. - G., Wang, X. - S., Yang, Z., Wu, C., Liu, F. & Zhang, T. (2020) Taxonomy of a katydid genus Mecopoda Serville (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae, Mecopodinae) from East Asia. Zootaxa, 4758 (2), 296 - 310. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4758.2.5
  • Sismondo, E (1990) Synchronous, alternating, and phase-locked stridulation by a tropical katydid. Science, 249, 55 - 58. https: // doi. org / 10.1126 / science. 249.4964.55
  • Nityananda, V. & Balakrishnan, R. (2006) A diversity of songs among morphologically indistinguishable katydids of the genus Mecopoda (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) from southern India. Bioacoustics, 15, 223 - 250. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 09524622.2006.9753552