Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published January 12, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Risky movements? Natal dispersal does not decrease survival of a large herbivore

  • 1. Seattle Pacific University
  • 2. United States Geological Survey
  • 3. Pennsylvania Game Commission*

Description

Natal dispersal is assumed to be a particularly risky movement behavior as individuals transfer, often long distances, from birth site to site of potential first reproduction. Though, because this behavior persists in populations, it is assumed that dispersal increases the fitness of individuals despite the potential for increased risk of mortality. The extent of dispersal risk, however, has rarely been tested, especially for large mammals. Therefore, we aimed to test the relationship between dispersal and survival for both males and females in a large herbivore. Using a radio-transmittered sample of 398 juvenile male and 277 juvenile female white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), we compared survival rates of dispersers and non-dispersers. We predicted that dispersing deer would experience greater overall mortality than philopatric deer due to direct transfer-related risks (e.g., vehicular collision), indirect immigration-related mortality attributable to colonization of unfamiliar habitat, and increased over-winter mortality associated with energetic costs of movement and unfamiliarity with recently colonized habitat. For both male and female yearlings, survival rates of dispersers (male = 49.9%, female = 64.0%) did not differ from non-dispersers (male = 51.6%, female = 70.7%). Only two individuals (both female) were killed by vehicular collision during transfer, and over-winter survival patterns were similar between the two groups. Although dispersal movement likely incurs energetic costs on dispersers, these costs do not necessarily translate to decreased survival. In many species, including white-tailed deer, dispersal is likely condition-dependent, such that larger and healthier individuals are more likely to disperse; therefore, costs associated with dispersal are more likely to be borne successfully by those individuals that do disperse. Whether low-risk dispersal of large mammals is the rule or the exception will require additional research. Further, future research is needed to evaluate non-survival fitness-related costs and benefits of dispersal (e.g., increased reproductive opportunities for dispersers).

Notes

Explanation of data.pdf is a file that explains the format of the input files.

Funding provided by: Pennsylvania Game Commission
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100016439
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Pennsylvania State University
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008321
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Pennsylvania Audubon Society*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Quality Deer Management Association*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Pennsylvania Deer Association*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Pennsylvania Audubon Society
Crossref Funder Registry ID:

Funding provided by: Quality Deer Management Association
Crossref Funder Registry ID:

Funding provided by: Pennsylvania Deer Association
Crossref Funder Registry ID:

Files

Explanation_of_data_files_and_format.pdf

Files (237.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:cc8800dc4d054c5bb07325366a91b4ca
65.1 kB Preview Download
md5:dd7a066a9486e9637cbc26dc0b006b98
39.3 kB Download
md5:e9619175661f70bc2be86214482d0465
15.2 kB Download
md5:264af147ca4efc91ea9a1e24f7a40ba9
27.2 kB Download
md5:9e9be2ce416903b85ff468000d7e2bda
18.3 kB Download
md5:0e5305a2d35d4265fc3b529c58281111
53.2 kB Download
md5:a6130d216e66c2373bec98c928c9b690
18.7 kB Download