Published January 8, 2022 | Version v1
Figure Open

Figure 3 from: Datry T, Allen D, Argelich R, Barquin J, Bonada N, Boulton A, Branger F, Cai Y, Cañedo-Argüelles M, Cid N, Csabai Z, Dallimer M, de Araújo JC, Declerck S, Dekker T, Döll P, Encalada A, Forcellini M, Foulquier A, Heino J, Jabot F, Keszler P, Kopperoinen L, Kralisch S, Künne A, Lamouroux N, Lauvernet C, Lehtoranta V, Loskotová B, Marcé R, Martin Ortega J, Matauschek C, Miliša M, Mogyorósi S, Moya N, Müller Schmied H, Munné A, Munoz F, Mykrä H, Pal I, Paloniemi R, Pařil P, Pengal P, Pernecker B, Polášek M, Rezende C, Sabater S, Sarremejane R, Schmidt G, Senerpont Domis L, Singer G, Suárez E, Talluto M, Teurlincx S, Trautmann T, Truchy A, Tyllianakis E, Väisänen S, Varumo L, Vidal J-P, Vilmi A, Vinyoles D (2021) Securing Biodiversity, Functional Integrity, and Ecosystem Services in Drying River Networks (DRYvER). Research Ideas and Outcomes 7: e77750. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e77750

  • 1. National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment, Villeurbanne Cedex, France
  • 2. University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States of America
  • 3. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • 4. Environmental Hydraulics Institute, University of Cantabria, Cantabria, Spain
  • 5. University of New England, School of Environmental and Rural Science, Armidale, Australia
  • 6. Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China
  • 7. University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
  • 8. University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds, United Kingdom
  • 9. Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil|Universidad San Francisco Xavier, Sucre, Bolivia
  • 10. Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Wageningen, Netherlands
  • 11. Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • 12. Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador
  • 13. University of Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
  • 14. Finnish Environmental Institute, SYKE, Helsinki, Finland
  • 15. South-Transdanubian Water Management Directorate, Pécs, Hungary
  • 16. Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
  • 17. Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
  • 18. Catalan Institute for Water Research, Girona, Spain
  • 19. Fresh Thoughts Consulting, Wien, Austria
  • 20. University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 21. Z5 Plus Design, Pécs, Hungary
  • 22. Universidad San Francisco Xavier, Sucre, Bolivia
  • 23. Catalan Water Agency, Barcelona, Spain
  • 24. Institute REVIVO, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 25. Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
  • 26. University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

Description

Figure 3 The DRYvER three-step workflow embedded within 7 Work Packages (WP) and the four main attributes of the DRYvER consortium (red ovals).

Files

oo_601846.jpg

Files (194.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9ea486ada2a37c27d3adad73ee7b46a7
194.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Journal article: 10.3897/rio.7.e77750 (DOI)