Published November 24, 2021 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Phlegmariurus reflexus ­­­ (Lamarck) B. Øllgaard 2012

  • 1. Herbarium AAU, Science Museums of the University of Aarhus, and Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Biology, Build. 1137, University of Aarhus, DK- 8000 Aarhus C., Denmark; benjamin. oellgaard @ bio. au. dk; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 0408 - 7134
  • 2. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden; westontesto @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 3194 - 5763 & Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Center, Göteborg, Sweden

Description

2. Phlegmariurus reflexus ­­­ (Lamarck) B. Øllgaard (2012a: 481). Fig. 11A

Lycopodium reflexum Lamarck (1792: 653).— Plananthus reflexus (Lamarck) Palisot de Beauvois (1805: 100).— Urostachys reflexus (Lamarck) Herter (1922: 249).— Huperzia reflexa (Lamarck) Trevisan (1874: 248). Type:— MARTINIQUE: herb. Lamarck, Comm. Joseph Martin s. n. (P holotype).

Lycopodium bifidum Willdenow (1810: 53).— Lycopodium reflexum Lamarck var. majus Spring (1842: 26).— Huperzia reflexa (Lamarck) Trevisan var. bifida (Willdenow) Trevisan (1874: 248).— Urostachys bifidus (Willdenow) Nessel (1939: 110).— Huperzia bifida (Willdenow) Holub (1985: 71). Type:— VENEZUELA: Cuchilla de Guajana Guajana, Humboldt & Bonpland 474 (B-Willdenow 19421 holotype; P-Humboldt isotype).

Lycopodium reversum Presl (1825: 82). Urostachys reversus (Presl) Herter (1949a: 78). Type:— ECUADOR: Guayaquil, Haenke s. n. (PRC holotype).

Lycopodium reflexum Lamarck var. densifolium Baker (1887: 11).— Lycopodium densifolium (Baker) Underwood & Lloyd (1906: 106).— Urostachys reflexus (Lamarck) Herter var. densifolius (Baker) Nessel (1927: 394).— Urostachys densifolius (Underwood & Lloyd) Herter (1949a: 58).—Type:— COLOMBIA: Popayan, Hartweg 1480 (G, K); Moritz 2266 (= 226b: HBG, K); BRAZIL: Glaziou 15797 (K); syntypes.

Lycopodium pearcei Baker (1887: 14).— Urostachys pearcei (Baker) Nessel (1939: 73).— Huperzia pearcei (Baker) Holub (1985: 75). Type:— BOLIVIA: Santa Cruz, Feb. 1864 (K holotype; BONN-herb. Nessel 116 isotype).

Urostachys jergii Nessel (1935: 70). Type:— PUERTO RICO: Sintenis 6346 (BONN-Nessel 229 holotype; NY isotype).

Lycopodium mexiae Copeland (1941: 294).— Huperzia mexiae (Copeland) Rolleri and Deferrari (1988: 156). Type:— PERU: Huánuco, Churubamba, trail Cotirarda–Mercedes, 1875 m, Mexia 8193 a (UC holotype; F, GH, K, MICH isotypes).

Urostachys leptodon Herter (1954: 120–121).— Lycopodium leptodon (Herter) Morton (1964: 72).— Huperzia leptodon (Herter) Rolleri & Deferrari (1988: 156). Type:— COLOMBIA: Guasca, Bro. Ariste-Joseph A132 (US 888340 holotype).

Urostachys stellae-polaris Herter (1954: 121).— Lycopodium stellae-polaris (Herter) Morton (1964: 72). Type:— COLOMBIA: Cundinamarca, Guayabetal to Monte Redondo, SE of Quetame, 1300–1500 m, Pennell 1801 (US holotype; GH, NY isotypes).

Lycopodium spongiosum Rolleri (1985: 6).— Huperzia spongiosa (Rolleri) Rolleri & Deferrari (1988: 157). Type:— COLOMBIA: Cundinamarca, Chocontá–Guateque highway, 2900 m, Haught 5906 (US holotype, COL, F, NY, S isotypes)

Plants erect or ascending from a decumbent base, soft, usually forming small loose clumps, 10–30 (–40) cm tall. Shoots homophyllous, almost equally thick throughout, 7–15 mm in diameter including leaves. Stems excluding leaves 1.5–3 (–4) mm thick at base, sometimes tapering to 1–1.5 mm thick, ridged by decurrent leaves or almost smooth, sporangiate from 2–12 cm above the base and upward, usually 2–5 times dichotomous. Leaves borne in alternating, often irregular and oblique, whorls of (6–) 7–8 (–9), these 0.7–2.5 mm apart, forming 12–18 longitudinal ranks, ascending to spreading or sharply reflexed, straight to strongly recurved, linear-subulate, widest just above the base, 4–8 × 0.5–1 (–1.2) mm, softly herbaceous to subcoriaceous, adaxially convex, or concave near the base, abaxially flat, or slightly concave to convex, with obscure to somewhat prominent vein, with flat to revolute, very sparsely to densely denticulate to short-ciliolate margins. Leaf bases often somewhat decurrent. Sporangia 1–1.5 mm wide.

­­­ Distribution: Throughout humid mountainous regions of Tropical America.

­­­ Habitats: Terrestrial, erect or ascending herbs. Commonly pioneers on road banks and other open, humid situations, generally in montane forest, 370–3400 m elev.

­­­ Notes: Phlegmariurus reflexus is widespread in the Neotropics. It is a frequent pioneer on moist, disturbed ground, but may also occur in peat bogs, or even, by chance, as a low epiphyte. It is related to P. eversus.

Phlegmariurus reflexus is highly variable with respect to leaf and stem size, direction and crowding of leaves, and leaf margin characters. Part of the variation may reflect growth conditions, but often several different forms may be found growing intermixed in the same habitat, indicating that genetic differences exist. The variation patterns are complex and in need of a detailed study. The different morphological forms of P. reflexus, as well as other closely related species, often occur together on large road banks or landslides, and here may be compared under uniform growth conditions. In such populations the individuals may exhibit subtle or obvious differences. Neighbouring and more distant populations may exhibit similar variation and thus taxonomic recognition may be indicated. However, often the differences are not matched by other individuals, neither in the same nor in other populations, and therefore the plants may have the character of individual aberrants. Some of these are intermediate between other forms and may be hybrids, without exhibiting hybrid features such as abortive spores or irregular meioses.

The following variety of small dimensions stands somewhat apart, and was earlier recognized taxonomically, but this idea has been abandoned because it is an exaggerated simplification of the variation.

Notes

Published as part of Øllgaard, Benjamin & Testo, Weston, 2021, The Lycopodiaceae of Panamá, pp. 1-66 in Phytotaxa 526 (1) on pages 36-37, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.526.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5723180

Files

Files (6.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3fbc3819cf7cf719e253672629befda0
6.4 kB Download

System files (36.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6dd21b8e1b82e973cedf420345b1ca65
36.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Ollgaard, B. (2012 a) Nomenclatural changes in Brazilian Lycopodiaceae. Rodrigueisia 63: 479 - 482. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 2175 - 78602012000200020
  • Palisot de Beauvois, A. M. F. J. (1805) Prodrome des cinquieIme et sixieIme familles de L'AEtheiogamie. Les Mousses. Les Lycopodes. Paris, pp. 1 - 114.
  • Herter, W. (1922) Itinera Herteriana III. Heteropteridophyta austroamericana. (Equisetales Lycopodiales Selaginellales Isoe ¨ tales austroamericanae.) Beihefte zum botanischen Centralblatt 39 (Abteilung II): 248 - 256.
  • Trevisan de Saint-Leon, V. (1874) Sylloge sporophytarum Italiae. Atti della Societai Italiana de Scienze Naturali 17: 242 - 249.
  • Willdenow, K. L. (1810) Caroli a Linnei Species Plantarum. Ed. quarta. Vol. 5 (1). G. C. Nauk, Berlin, pp. i - xxxxx, 1 - 542.
  • Spring, A. F. (1842) Monographie de la famille des Lycopodiaceies, premieIre partie. Meimoires de l' Academie Royale Belgique 15: 1 - 110.
  • Nessel, H. (1939) Die Ba ¨ rlappgewa ¨ chse (Lycopodiaceae). Eine beschreibende Zusammenstellung mit besonderer Beru ¨ cksichtigung ihrer Varieta ¨ ten und Formen. Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp. i - viii, 1 - 404.
  • Holub, J. (1985) Transfers of Lycopodium species to Huperzia: with a note on generic classification in Huperziaceae. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 20: 67 - 80. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / BF 02856466
  • Presl, C. B. (1825) Lycopodiaceae. In: Reliquiae Haenkeana. Vol. 1. J. G. Calve, Prague, pp. 77 - 83.
  • Herter, W. (1949 a) Index Lycopodiorum. Estudios Botanicos en la regioin Uruguaya, Montevideo 20: 1 - 120.
  • Baker, J. G. (1887) Handbook of the fern-allies. London. 1 - 159.
  • Underwood, L. M. & Lloyd, F. E. (1906) The species of Lycopodium of the American tropics. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 33: 101 - 124. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 2478744
  • Nessel, H. (1927) As Lycopodiaiceas do Brasil. Traducc ¸ aTo, arranjo do catailogo das espeicies do Hervairio da Secc ¸ aTo de Botanica do Museu Paulista e illustrac ¸ oTes de F. C. Hoehne. Archivos de Botanica do Estado de S. Paulo 1 (4): 355 - 535.
  • Nessel, H. (1935) Beitra ¨ ge zur Kenntnis der Gattung Lycopodium. Repertorium Specierum Novarum regni Vegetabilis 39: 61 - 71, t. 189 - 194. https: // doi. org / 10.1002 / fedr. 19350390109
  • Copeland, E. B. (1941) Tropical American Ferns. University of California Publications in Botany 19: 287 - 340, t. 36 - 66.
  • Rolleri, C. & Deferrari, A. M. (1988) Nota sobre la transferencia de especies del genero Lycopodium L. (Lycopodiaceae Mirb.) al genero Huperzia Bernh. (Huperziaceae Rothm. - Lycopodiales - Pteridophyta). Notas del Museo de La Plata, Botainica 21: 153 - 157.
  • Morton, C. V. (1964) New combinations in Lycopodium. American Fern Journal 54: 71 - 73. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 1547036
  • Rolleri, C. (1985) Notas nomenclaturales y taxonomicas en la seccion Crassistachys Herter del Genero Lycopodium L. (Lycopodiaceae), II. Revista del Museo de La Plata (Nueva Serie) Botainica 14 (87): 1 - 9.