Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published July 14, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Osteological characters of birds and reptiles are more congruent with molecular phylogenies than soft characters are

Creators

Description

Callender-Crowe, Leah M., Sansom, Robert S. (2022): Osteological characters of birds and reptiles are more congruent with molecular phylogenies than soft characters are. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 194: 1-13, DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa136

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFBDAA26FFA3C83BFFB8FFF2FFB5FFB5

Cites
Publication: 10.1371/currents.tol.c1af68dda7c999ed9f1e4b2d2df7a08e (DOI)
Publication: 10.1038/npg.els.0003357 (DOI)
Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5798634 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5798636 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF5233C0FFA6C83EFF37FE5BFDEFFDA2 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5798638 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF5233C0FFABC833FF29FF36FCB9FED9 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF5233C0FFABC833FF2AFD87FDD5FC8E (URL)

References

  • Arnold EN. 1997. Interrelationships and evolution of the east
  • Bapst DW. 2012. Paleotree : an R package for paleontological and phylogenetic analyses of evolution. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 803-807.
  • Bertelli S, Chiappe LM, Mayr G. 2014. Phylogenetic interrelationships of living and extinct Tinamidae, volant palaeognathous birds from the New World. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 172: 145-184.
  • Birdsley JS. 2002. Phylogeny of the tyrant flycatchers (Tyrannidae) Based on morphology and behavior. The Auk 119: 715-734.
  • Castoe TA, de Koning AP, Kim HM, Gu W, Noonan BP, Naylor G, Jiang ZJ, Parkinson CL, Pollock DD. 2009. Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 8986-8991.
  • Chen IP, Stuart-Fox D, Hugall AF, Symonds MR. 2012. Sexual selection and the evolution of complex color patterns in dragon lizards. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution 66: 3605-3614.
  • Chu PC. 1995. Phylogenetic reanalysis of Strauch's osteological data set for the Charadriiformes. The Condor 97: 174-196.
  • Clarke JA, Middleton KM. 2008. Mosaicism, modules, and the evolution of birds: results from a Bayesian approach to the study of morphological evolution using discrete character data. Systematic Biology 57: 185-201.
  • Clarke JA, Ksepka DT, Stucchi M, Urbina M, Giannini N, Bertelli S, Narvaez Y, Boyd CA. 2007. Paleogene equatorial penguins challenge the proposed relationship between biogeography, diversity, and Cenozoic climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 11545-11550.
  • Davis KE, Page RDM. 2014. Reweaving the tapestry: a supertree of birds. PLoS Currents Tree of Life 6 (Ed. 1). doi: 10.1371/currents.tol.c1af68dda7c999ed9f1e4b2d2df7a08e.
  • Daza JD, Bauer AM. 2012. A new amber-embedded sphaerodactyl gecko from Hispaniola, with comments on morphological synapomorphies of the Sphaerodactylidae. Breviora 529: 1-28.
  • Eo SH, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Carroll JP. 2009. A phylogenetic supertree of the fowls (Galloanserae, Aves). Zoologica Scripta 38: 465-481.
  • Field DJ, Gauthier JA, King BL, Pisani D, Lyson TR, Peterson KJ. 2014. Toward consilience in reptile phylogeny: miRNAs support an archosaur, not lepidosaur, affinity for turtles. Evolution & Development 16: 189-196.
  • Foote AD, Liu Y, Thomas GW, Vinar T, Alfoldi J, Deng J, Dugan S, van Elk CE, Hunter ME, Joshi V, Khan Z, Kovar C, Lee SL, Lindblad-Toh K, Mancia A, Nielsen R, Qin X, Qu J, Raney BJ, Vijay N, Wolf JB, Hahn MW, Muzny DM, Worley KC, Gilbert MT, Gibbs RA. 2015. Convergent evolution of the genomes of marine mammals. Nature Genetics 47: 272-275.
  • Frank-Hoeflich K, Silveira LF, Estudillo-Lopez J, Garcia-Koch AM, Ongay-Larios L, Pinero D. 2007. Increased taxon and character sampling reveals novel intergeneric relationships in the Cracidae (Aves: Galliformes). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 45: 242-254.
  • Frost DR, Etheridge R, Janies D, Titus TA. 2001a. Total evidence, sequence alignment, evolution of polychrotid lizards, and a reclassification of the Iguania (Squamata: Iguania). American Museum Novitates 3343: 1-39.
  • Frost DR, Rodrigues MT, Grant T, Titus TA. 2001b. Phylogenetics of the lizard genus Tropidurus (Squamata: Tropiduridae: Tropidurinae): direct optimization, descriptive efficiency, and sensitivity analysis of congruence between molecular data and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 352-371.
  • Gaubert P, Wozencraft WC, Cordeiro-Estrela P, Veron G. 2005. Mosaics of convergences and noise in morphological phylogenies: what's in a viverrid-like carnivoran? Systematic Biology 54: 865-894.
  • Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon KC. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774-786.
  • Goswami A, Polly PD. 2010. The influence of modularity on cranial morphological disparity in Carnivora and Primates (Mammalia). PLoS One 5: e9517.
  • Hackett SJ, Kimball RT, Reddy S, Bowie RC, Braun EL, Braun MJ, Chojnowski JL , Cox WA, Han KL , Harshman J, Huddleston CJ, Marks BD, Miglia KJ, Moore WS, Sheldon FH, Steadman DW, Witt CC, Yuri T. 2008. A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science (New York, N.Y.) 320: 1763-1768.
  • Hitchmough R. 1997. A systematic revisions of the New Zealand Gekkonidae. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
  • Hofmann CM, Cronin TW, Omland KE. 2007. Melanin coloration in New World orioles II: ancestral state reconstruction reveals lability in the use of carotenoids and phaeomelanins. Journal of Avian Biology 38: 172-181.
  • Holland BR, Spencer HG, Worthy TH, Kennedy M. 2010. Identifying cliques of convergent characters: concerted evolution in the cormorants and shags. Systematic Biology 59: 433-445.
  • Hu H, Uesaka M, Guo S, Shimai K, Lu TM, Li F , Fujimoto S, Ishikawa M, Liu S, Sasagawa Y, Zhang G, Kuratani S, Yu JK, Kusakabe TG, Khaitovich P, Irie N; EXPANDE Consortium. 2017. Constrained vertebrate evolution by pleiotropic genes. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1: 1722-1730.
  • Irestedt M, Fjeldsa J, Ericson PGP. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of woodcreepers (Aves: Dendrocolaptinae) - incongruence between molecular and morphological data. Journal of Avian Biology 35: 280-288.
  • Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO. 2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491: 444-448.
  • Kamilar JM, Muldoon KM. 2010. The climatic niche diversity of malagasy primates: a phylogenetic perspective. PLoS One 5: e11073.
  • Kearney M. 2003. Systematics of the Amphisbaenia (Lepidosauria: Squamata) based on morphological evidence from recent and fossil forms. Herpetological Monographs 17: 1-74.
  • Kivell TL, Barros AP, Smaers JB. 2013. Different evolutionary pathways underlie the morphology of wrist bones in hominoids. BMC Evolutionary Biology 13: 229.
  • Lee MS, Palci A. 2015. Morphological phylogenetics in the genomic age. Current Biology: CB 25: R922-R929.
  • Lepage D. 2003. Avibase - the world bird database. Available at http://avibase.bsc-eoc.org. Accessed 2017.
  • Livezey BC. 1991. A phyogenetic analysis and classification of recent dabbling ducks (tribe Anatini) based on comparative morphology. The Auk 108: 471-507.
  • Livezey BC. 1996a. A phylogenetic analysis of modern pochards (Anatidae: Aythyini). The Auk 113: 74-93.
  • Livezey BC. 1996b. A phylogenetic analysis of geese and swans (Anseriformes: Anserinae), including selected fossil species. Systematic Biology 45: 415-450.
  • Livezey BC. 1998. A phylogenetic analysis of the Gruiformes (Aves) based on morphological characters, with an emphasis on the rails (Rallidae). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 353: 2077-2151.
  • Livezey BC, Zusi RL. 2007. Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 149: 1-95.
  • Lloyd GT. 2009. Graeme T. Lloyd matrices. Available at http:// www.graemetlloyd.com/matr.html. Accessed 2016.
  • Mauricio GN, Areta JI, Bornschein MR, Reis RE. 2012. Morphology-based phylogenetic analysis and classification of the family Rhinocryptidae (Aves: Passeriformes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166: 377-432.
  • Mayr G. 2011. Metaves, Mirandornithes, Strisores and other novelties - a critical review of the higher-level phylogeny of neornithine birds. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 49: 58-76.
  • McCracken KG, Harshman J, McClellan DA, Afton AD. 1999. Data set incongruence and correlated character evolution: an example of functional convergence in the hind-limbs of stifftail diving ducks. Systematic Biology 48: 683-714.
  • McInerney JO, O'Connell MJ, Pisani D. 2014. The hybrid nature of the Eukaryota and a consilient view of life on Earth. Nature reviews. Microbiology 12: 449-455.
  • Mounce RC, Sansom R, Wills MA. 2016. Sampling diverse characters improves phylogenies:Craniodental and postcranial characters of vertebrates often imply different trees. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution 70: 666-686.
  • Nesbitt SJ, Ksepka DT, Clarke JA. 2011. Podargiform affinities of the enigmatic Fluvioviridavis platyrhamphus and the early diversification of Strisores ('Caprimulgiformes' + Apodiformes). PLoS One 6: e26350.
  • O'Reilly JE, Puttick MN, Parry L, Tanner AR, Tarver JE, Fleming J, Pisani D, Donoghue PCJ. 2016. Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data. Biology Letters 12: 20160081.
  • Omland KE, Lanyon SM. 2000. Reconstructing plumage evolution in orioles (Icterus): repeated convergence and reversal in patterns. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution 54: 2119-2133.
  • Patten MA, Fugate M. 1998. Systematic relationships among the emberizid sparrows. The Auk 115: 412-424.
  • Price JJ, Friedman NR, Omland KE. 2007. Song and plumage evolution in the New World orioles (Icterus) show similar lability and convergence in patterns. Evolution 61: 850-863.
  • Prum R. 1992. Syringeal morphology, phylogeny, and evolution of the neotropical manakins (Aves, Pipridae). American Museum Novitates 3043: 1-65.
  • Prum RO. 1993. Phylogeny, biogeography, and evolution of the broadbills (Eurylaimidae) and asities (Philepittidae) based on morphology. The Auk 110: 304-324.
  • Puttick MN, O'Reilly JE, Tanner AR, Fleming JF, Clark J, Holloway L, Lozano-Fernandez J, Parry LA, Tarver JE, Pisani D, Donoghue PCJ. 2017. Uncertaintree: discriminating among competing approaches to the phylogenetic analysis of phenotype data. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 284: 20162290. 1-9
  • Reddy S, Kimball RT, Pandey A, Hosner PA, Braun MJ, Hackett SJ, Han KL, Harshman J, Huddleston CJ, Kingston S , Marks BD, Miglia KJ, Moore WS , Sheldon FH, Witt CC, Yuri T, Braun EL. 2017. Why do phylogenomic data sets yield conflicting trees? Data type influences the avian tree of life more than taxon sampling. Systematic Biology 66: 857-879.
  • Reeder TW, Townsend TM, Mulcahy DG, Noonan BP, Wood PL Jr, Sites JW Jr, Wiens JJ. 2015. Integrated analyses resolve conflicts over squamate reptile phylogeny and reveal unexpected placements for fossil taxa. PLoS One 10: e0118199.
  • Sadleir RW, Makovicky PJ. 2008. Cranial shape and correlated characters in crocodilian evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 1578-1596.
  • Sansom RS, Wills MA. 2017. Differences between hard and soft phylogenetic data. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 20172150: 1-7.
  • Sansom RS, Wills MA, Williams T. 2017. Dental data perform relatively poorly in reconstructing mammal phylogenies: morphological partitions evaluated with molecular benchmarks. Systematic Biology 66: 813-822.
  • Shine R, Langkilde T, Mason RT. 2004. Courtship tactics in garter snakes: how do a male's morphology and behaviour influence his mating success? Animal Behaviour 67: 477-483.
  • Smith NA. 2011. Taxonomic revision and phylogenetic analysis of the flightless Mancallinae (Aves, Pan-Alcidae). ZooKeys 91: 1-116.
  • Song H, Bucheli SR. 2010. Comparison of phylogenetic signal between male genitalia and non-genital characters in insect systematics. Cladistics 26: 23-35.
  • Strauch JG. 1978. The phylogeny of the Charadriiformes (Aves): a new estimate using the method of character compatibility analysis. The Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 34: 263-345.
  • Sullivan TN, Wang B, Espinosa HD, Meyers MA. 2017. Extreme lightweight structures: avian feathers and bones. Materials Today 20: 377-391.
  • Swierk L, Ridgway M, Langkilde T. 2012. Female lizards discriminate between potential reproductive partners using multiple male traits when territory cues are absent. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66: 1033-1043.
  • Torres C, Van Tuinen M. 2013. Relationships of birds - molecules versus morphology. eLS: https://doi.org/10.1038/ npg.els.0003357.
  • Vieira GHC, Colli GR, Bao SN. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships of corytophanid lizards (Iguania, Squamata, Reptilia) based on partitioned and total evidence analyses of sperm morphology, gross morphology, and DNA data. Zoologica Scripta 34: 605-625.
  • Wanninger A. 2015. Morphology is dead - long live morphology! Integrating MorphoEvoDevo into molecular EvoDevo and phylogenomics. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 3: 54.
  • Wiens JJ. 2004. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Systematic Biology 53: 653-661.
  • Wiens JJ. 2009. Estimating rates and patterns of morphological evolution from phylogenies: lessons in limb lability from Australian Lerista lizards. Journal of Biology 8: 19.
  • Winker K, Pruett CL. 2006. Seasonal migration, speciation, and morphological convergence in the genus Catharus (Turdidae). The Auk 123: 1052-1068.
  • Wright AM, Hillis DM. 2014. Bayesian analysis using a simple likelihood model outperforms parsimony for estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data. PLoS One 9: e109210.
  • Yi HY, Norell MA. 2013. New materials of Estesia mongoliensis (Squamata: Anguimorpha) and the evolution of venom grooves in lizards. American Museum Novitates 3767: 1-31.
  • Zheng Y, Wiens JJ. 2016. Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 94: 537-547.
  • Zou Z, Zhang J. 2016. Morphological and molecular convergences in mammalian phylogenetics. Nature Communications 7: 12758.