Published February 17, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Corrigenda: Cepeda GD, Sabatini ME, Scioscia CL, Ramírez FC, Viñas MD (2016) On the uncertainty beneath the name Oithona similis Claus, 1866 (Copepoda, Cyclopoida). ZooKeys 552: 1–15. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.552.6083

  • 1. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero, Mar del Plata, Argentina
  • 2. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Consejo Naci, Mar del Plata, Argentina
  • 3. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia (CONICET-MACNBR), Avenida Ángel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR Buenos Aires, Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 4. Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero (INIDEP), Paseo Victoria Ocampo No 1, B7602HSA Mar del Plata, Argentina., Mar del Plata, Argentina

Description

The marine cyclopoid Oithona similis sensu lato Claus, 1866, is considered to be one of the most abundant and ubiquitous copepods in the world. However, its minimal original diagnosis and the unclear connection with its (subjective) senior synonym Oithona helgolandica Claus, 1863, may have caused frequent misidentification of the species. Consequently, it seems possible that several closely related but distinct forms are being named O. similis or O. helgolandica without explicit and accurate discrimination. Here the current situation concerning the correct assignment of the two species is revised, the morphological characters commonly used to identify and distinguish each species are summarized, and the nomenclatural implications of indiscriminately using these names in current taxonomic and ecological practice is considered. It is not intended to upset a long-accepted name in its accustomed meaning but certainly the opposite. “In pursuit of the maximum stability compatible with taxonomic freedom” (International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature), we consider that reassessment of the diagnostic characters of O. similis sensu stricto cannot be postponed much longer. While a consensus on taxonomy and nomenclatural matters can be attained, we strongly recommend specifically reporting the authority upon which the identification of either O. similis s.l. or O. helgolandica s.l. has been accomplished.

Files

ZK_article_8009.pdf

Files (127.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a754748352b139fcc65bd4c883e36eb2
118.2 kB Preview Download
md5:c23ea5528718e06d0772da0b3d26405b
9.4 kB Preview Download

Linked records