Published May 17, 2010 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Identity of the ailanthus webworm moth (Lepidoptera, Yponomeutidae), a complex of two species: evidence from DNA barcoding, morphology and ecology

  • 1. Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, , Canada
  • 2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada , Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • 3. University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, United States of America
  • 4. Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, ,
  • 5. , , Canada
  • 6. Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, , Canada
  • 7. Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Guelph, , Canada

Description

During extensive ongoing campaigns to inventory moths of North America and Area de Conservacion Guanacaste (ACG), northwestern Costa Rica, we discovered that morphologically similar yponomeutid moths were assigned two different names, Atteva ergatica Walsingham in Costa Rica and A. punctella (Stoll) in North America, but had identical DNA barcodes. Combining DNA barcoding, morphology and food plant records also revealed a complex of two sympatric species that are diagnosable by their DNA barcodes and their facies in Costa Rica. However, neither of the names could be correctly applied to either species, as A. ergatica is a junior synonym and A. punctella a junior homonym. By linking our specimens to type material through morphology and DNA barcoding, we determined that the ACG dry forest species, distributed from Costa Rica to southern Quebec and Ontario, should be called A. aurea, whereas the similar and marginally sympatric ACG rain forest species found in Central America should be called A. pustulella. Neotypes are designated for Phalaena Tinea punctella Stoll, 1781 and Deiopeia aurea Fitch, 1857. Atteva floridana has identical barcodes to A. aurea and provisionally maintained as a synonym.

Files

ZK_article_2199.pdf

Files (3.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:af9de341dae1706784c29dc96911560f
3.0 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF9DE341FFE17067FFC2FFC96911560F
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FF9DE341FFE17067FFC2FFC96911560F

References

  • Avise JC, Ball RM (1990) Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 7: 45-67.
  • Becker VO (2009) A review of the New World Atteva Walker moths (Yponomeutidae, Attevinae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 53: 349-355.
  • Berg C (1880) Observaciones sobre la familia Hyponomeutidae (continuacion). Anales de La Sociedad Cientifica Argentina 10: 99-109.
  • Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Hallwachs W, Hebert, PDN (2007) DNA barcodes of closely related (but morphologically and ecologically distinct) species of skipper butterflies (Hesperiidae) can differ by only one to three nucleotides. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 61: 138-153.
  • Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2008) DNA barcodes and cryptic species of skipper butterflies in the genus Perichares in Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Costa Rica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 6350-6355.
  • Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hajibabaei M, Hebert PDN (2009) Genitalia, DNA barcodes, and life histories synonymize Telles with Thracides - a genus in which Telles arcalaus looks out of place (Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 63: 141-153.
  • Busck A (1908) Descriptions of North American Tineina. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 9: 85-95.
  • Busck A (1912) New Microlepidoptera from Mexico. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 14: 83-87.
  • Butler AG (1877) On the Lepidoptera, Orthoptera, and Hemiptera collected during the visit of H.M.S. 'Peterel' to the Galapagos Islands. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1877: 86-91.
  • Clemens B (1861) Contributions to American Lepidopterology 7. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia 1860: 522-547.
  • Covell CV (1984) A field guide to the moths of Eastern North America. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 496 pp.
  • Cracraft J (1983) Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis. Current Ornithology 1: 159-187.
  • Ding J, Wu Y, Zheung H, Fu W, Reardon R, Liu M (2006) Assessing potential control of the invasive plant, Ailanthus altissima. Biocontrol Science and Technology 16: 547-566.
  • Duckworth WD (1967) A new species of Atteva from Central America. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 69: 69-72.
  • Dugdale JS, Kristensen NP, Robinson GS, Scoble MJ (1998) Th e Yponomeutoidea. In: Kristensen NP (Ed) Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies 1. Evolution, Systematics and Biogeography. Handbook of Zoology IV, 35. De Gruyter, Berlin, 120-130.
  • Dyar HG (1897) Oeta floridana Neumoegen. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 5: 48.
  • Fabricius JC (1787) Mantissa insectorum. Proft, Copenhagen, 382 pp.
  • Fabricius JC (1794) Entomologia Systematica Part 2. Proft, Copenhagen, 349 pp.
  • Fabricius JC (1798) Suplementum entomologiae sistematicae. Proft & Storch, Copenhagen, 572 pp.
  • Fitch A (1857) Th ird report on the noxious and other insects of the state of New York. Transactions of the New York State Agricultural Society 16: 315-490.
  • Floyd R, Wilson JJ, Hebert PDN (2009) DNA barcodes and insect biodiversity. In: Footit RG, Adler PH (Eds) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 417-431.
  • Grote AR (1873) Contribution to a knowledge of North American moths. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural History 1: 73-94.
  • Hausmann A, Hebert PDN, Mitchell A, Rougerie R, Sommerer M, Young CJ (2009) Revision of the Australian Oenochroma vinaria Guenee, 1858 species-complex (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Oenochrominae): DNA barcoding reveals cryptic diversity and assesses status of type specimen without dissection. Zootaxa 2239: 1-21.
  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270: 313-321.
  • Hebert PDN, deWaard JR, Landry J-F (2009) DNA barcodes for 1/1000 of the animal kingdom. Biology Letters doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0848.
  • Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns J, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly, Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 14812-14817.
  • Heppner JB (1984) Yponomeutidae. In: Heppner JB (Ed) Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera, Checklist Part I. W. Junk, Th e Hague, 55-56.
  • Heppner JB (2003) Lepidoptera of Florida, part 1, Introduction and catalog. Arthropods of Florida and neighboring land areas, vol. 17. Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Gainsville. 670 pp.
  • Heppner JB, Duckworth WD (1983) Yponomeutidae. In: Hodges RW, Dominick T, Davis DR, Ferguson DC, Franclemont JG, Munroe EG, Powell JA (Eds) Check list of the Lepidoptera of America North of Mexico. Classey, London, 26-27.
  • Holland WJ (1903) Th e moth book. Doubleday, Page & Co, 479 pp.
  • Hubner J (1816-[1826]) Verzeichniss bekannter Schmettlinge. Augsburg, 431+72pp. (index). Pp. 161-240 [published in 1822].
  • ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1958) Opinion 516. Determination under the Plenary Powers of the relative precedence to be assigned to certain works on the Order Lepidoptera (Class Insecta) published in 1775 by Pieter Cramer, Michael Denis & Ignaz Schiffermuller, Johann Christian Fabricius, Johann Casper Fuessley, and S.A. von Rottemburg respectively. Opinions and declarations rendered by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 19(1): 1-44.
  • ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. Th e International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp.
  • Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Remigio E, Hebert PDN (2005) Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 360(1462): 1835-1845.
  • Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Blandin P, Burns JM, Cadiou, J-M, Chacon, I., Dapkey T, Deans A, Epstein M, Espinoza B, Franclemont J, Haber W, Hajibabaei M, Hallwachs J, Hebert P, Gauld ID, Harvey D, Hausmann A, Kitching I, Lafontaine D, Landry J-F, Lemaire C, Miller J, Miller J, Miller L, Miller S, Montero J, Munroe E, Green S, Rawlins J, Robbins R, Rodriguez J, Rougerie R, Sharkey M, Smith A, Solis MA, Sullivan B, Thiaucourt P, Wahl D, Weller S, Whitfield J, Willmott K, Wood DM, Woodley N, Wilson JJ (2009) Integration of DNA barcoding into an ongoing inventory of complex tropical biodiversity. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 1-25.
  • Kyrki N (1990) Tentative reclassification of the Holarctic Yponomeutoidea (Lepidoptera). Nota Lepidopterologica 13: 28-42.
  • Knolke S, Erlacher S, Hausmann A, Miller MA, Segerer AH (2005) A procedure for combined genitalia dissection and DNA extraction in Lepidoptera. Insect Systematics and Evolution 35: 401-409.
  • Landry B, Landry J-F (1998) Yponomeutidae of the Galapagos Islands, with the description of a new species of Prays (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Tropical Lepidoptera 9: 31-40.
  • Meyrick E (1914) Hyponomeutidae, Plutellidae, Amphitheridae. Lepidopterorum catalogus 19: 1-20.
  • Meyrick E (1926) On the Microlepidoptera from the Galapagos Islands and Rapa. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 74: 269-278.
  • Neumoegen B (1891) New Rhopalocera and Heterocera. Th e Canadian Entomologist 23: 122-126.
  • Powell JA, Comstock JA, Harbison CF (1973) Biology, geographical distribution, and status of Atteva exquisita (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History 17: 175-186.
  • Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2007) BOLD: Th e Barcode of Life Data System (www.dnabarcoding.org). Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 355-364.
  • Regier JC, Zwick A, Cummings MP, Kawahara AY, Cho S, Weller S, Roe A, Baixeras J, Brown JW, Parr C, Davis DR, Epstein M, Hallwachs W, Hausmann A, Janzen DH, Kitching IJ, Solis MA, Yen SH, Bazinet AL, Mitter C (2009) Toward reconstructing the evolution of advanced moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera: Ditrysia): an initial molecular study. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 280 (doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-280).
  • Smith MA, Wood DM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2007) DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 4967-4972.
  • Smith MA, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Deans AR, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2008) Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 12359-12364.
  • Stoll C (1781) [Lepidoptera]. In: Cramer P (Ed) De Uitlandsche Kapellen IV. Baalde, Amsterdam, 91-164.
  • Stretch RH (1872-1873) Illustrations of the Zygaenidae and Bombycidae of North America. Author, San Francisco, 242 pp.
  • Swofford DL (1998) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 4.0b2a. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
  • Wallengren HDJ (1861) Lepidoptera. In: Fregatten Eugenies Resa, K. (Ed), Zoologia IV. Stockholm, 351-390.
  • Walsingham, Lord [T. de Gray] (1897) Revision of the West-Indian Micro-Lepidoptera, with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1897: 54- 183.
  • Walsingham, Lord [T. de Gray] (1914) Tineina, Pterophorina, Orneodina, Pyralidina and Hepialina (part). Biologia centrali-americana. Insecta. Lepidoptera-Heterocera. Vol. IV. 482 pp.
  • Zeller PC (1873) Beitrage zur Kenntniss nordamerikanischen Nachtfalter, besonders der Microlepidopteren. Verhandlungen der kaiserlich-koniglichen zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 23: 201-334.