Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published November 30, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Reproductive biology of direct developing and threatened frog Adelophryne maranguapensis (Anura, Eleutherodactylidae) reveals a cryptic reproductive mode for anurans and the first record of parental care for the genus

Creators

Description

Cassiano-Lima, Daniel, Lima, Ana V. P., Fortunato, Márcia E. M., de Sousa, Tiago A., de Castro, Déborah P., Borges-Nojosa, Diva M., Cechin, Sonia Z. (2020): Reproductive biology of direct developing and threatened frog Adelophryne maranguapensis (Anura, Eleutherodactylidae) reveals a cryptic reproductive mode for anurans and the first record of parental care for the genus. Journal of Natural History 54 (27-28): 1721-1733, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2020.1830192, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2020.1830192

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:6E46263DD109FFB7EE2AFFD09B465F68

Cites
Publication: 10.1080/00222930701311680 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1590/S0101-81751999000300022 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0619 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-10-00033.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1670/14-097 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1558- (DOI)
Publication: 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0207:RMIFAT] (DOI)
Publication: 10.1670/87-03N (DOI)
Publication: 10.1002/dvg.22935 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1655/08-020R1.1 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2307/2389077 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11646/zootaxa.1884.1.2 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/BF00317595 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002255 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1590/S1516-89132001000100012 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1590/S0102-33062004000400009 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1590/S0101-81751999000400004 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1643/0045-8511(2002)002[1128 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.1999.tb00144.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.1007/s13199-017-0500-9 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02726.x (DOI)
Publication: 10.2307/1939477 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1086/521958 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1073/pnas.0711579105 (DOI)
Publication: 10.2307/1444854 (DOI)
Publication: 10.1590/S0102- (DOI)
Publication: 10.2307/1940953 (DOI)
Publication: 10.11606/.2316-9079.v10i1p45-64 (DOI)
Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5754346 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5754348 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5754350 (DOI)

References

  • Afonso LG, Eterovick PC. 2007. Spatial and temporal distribution of breeding anurans in streams in southeastern Brazil. J Nat Hist. 41(13-16):949-963. doi:10.1080/00222930701311680.
  • Arzabe C. 1999. Reproductive activity patterns of anurans in two different altitudinal sites within the Brazilian Caatinga. Rev Bras Zool. 3:851-864. doi:10.1590/S0101-81751999000300022.
  • Beck CW. 1998. Mode of fertilization and parental care in anurans. An Behav. 55:439-449. doi:10.1006/anbe.1997.0619.
  • Brower JE, Zar JH. 1984. Field and laboratory methods for general Ecology. Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown Publishers; p. 226.
  • Camardelli M, Napoli M. 2012. Amphibian conservation in the Caatinga Biome and semiarid region of Brazil. Herpetologica. 68:31-47. doi:10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-10-00033.1.
  • Cascon P, Brito LBM, Roberto IJ. 2014. Anfibios. In: Botero JIS, Garcez DS, org. Anfibios e peixes do Parque Nacional de Ubajara e entorno. Fortaleza: UFC, Labomar, Nave; p. 31-75.
  • Cassiano-Lima DC, Borges-Nojosa DM, Cascon P, Cechin SZ. 2011. The reproductive mode of Adelophryne maranguapensis Hoogmoed, Borges & Cascon, 1994 (Anura, Eleutherodactylidae) an endemic and threatened species from Atlantic Forest remnants in northern Brazil. N West Jour Zool. 7:92-97.
  • Cheng WC, Kan YC. 2010. Paternal care and egg survivorship in a low nest-attendance Rhacophorid frog. Zool Stud. 49:304-310.
  • Crump ML. 1995. Parental care. In: Heatwole H, Sullivan BK, editors. Amphibian Biology (Vol. 2). New South Wales: Surrey Beatty and Sons; p. 518-567.
  • Crump ML. 2009. Amphibian diversity and life history. In: Dodd-Jr CK, editor. Amphibian ecology and conservation: a handbook of technics. London: Oxford University Press; p. 3-17.
  • Crump ML. 2015. Anuran reproductive modes: evolving perspectives. J Herpetology. 49:1-16. doi:10.1670/14-097.
  • Cullen-Jr L, Rudran R. 2004. Transectos lineares na estimativa de densidade de mamiferos e aves de medio e grande porte. In: Cullen-Jr L, Rudran R, Valladares-Padua C, org. Metodos de estudo em Biologia da ConservaCao e manejo da vida silvestre. Curitiba: UFPR; p. 169-179.
  • Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1994. Biology of amphibians. New York: McGraw-Hill; p. 696.
  • Fernandes A. 1998. Fitogeografia brasileira. Fortaleza: Multigraf; p. 340.
  • Frank JH, Lounibos LP. 1987. Phytotelmata: swamps or islands? Insect Behav Ecol. 70:14-20.
  • Frost DR. 2020. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. [accessed 2020]. https:// amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php.
  • Gomez-Mestre I, Pyron RA, Wiens JJ. 2012. Phylogenetics analyses reveal unexpected patterns in the evolution of reproductive modes in frogs. Evolution. 66:1-14. doi:10.1111/j.1558- 5646.2012.01715.x.
  • Haddad CFB, Prado CPA. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. BioScience. 55:207-217. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0207:RMIFAT] 2.0.CO;2.
  • Haddad CFB, Segalla MV, Bataus YSL, Uhlig VM, Batista FRQ, Garda A, Hudson AS, Cruz CAG, Strussmann C, Brasileiro CA, et al. 2018. Adelophryne maranguapensis Hoogmoed, Borges & Cascon, 1994. In: Ministerio do Meio Ambiente (MMA-ICMBio), org. Livro Vermelho da fauna brasileira ameaCada de extinCao. Vol. 5. Brasilia: Instituto Chico Mendes de ConservaCao da Biodiversidade (ICMBio); p. 60-62.
  • Hoogmoed MS, Borges DM, Cascon P. 1994. Three new species of the genus Adelophryne (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae) from northeastern Brazil, with remarks on the other species of the genus. Zool Med. 68:271-300.
  • Hoogmoed MS, Lescure J. 1984. A new genus and two new species of minute leptodactylid frogs from northern South America, with comments upon Phyzelaphryne (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae). Zool Med. 58:5-115.
  • Kitching RL. 2000. Food webs and container habitats: the natural history and ecology of phytotelmata. Cambridge: University Press; p. 431.
  • Lehtinen RM. 2003. Parental care and reproduction in two species of Mantidactylus (Anura: Mantellidae). J Herp. 37:766-768. doi:10.1670/87-03N.
  • Lehtinen RM, Lannoo MJ, Wassersug RJ. 2004. Phytotelm-breeding anurans: past, present, and future research. Misc Pub Mus Zool. 193:1-10.
  • Lima AVP, Reis AH, Amado NG, Lima DC, Borges-Nojosa DM, Oria RB, Abreu JG. 2016. Developmental aspects of the direct-developing frog Adelophryne maranguapensis. Genesis. 54:257-271. doi:10.1002/dvg.22935.
  • Lima DC, Cascon P. 2008. Aspectos socioambientais e legais da bananicultura na APA da Serra de Maranguape, Estado do Ceara. Rede. 2:64-79.
  • Lin YS, Lehtinen RM, Kam YC. 2008. Time and context-dependent oviposition site selection of a phytotelm-breeding frog in relation to habitat characteristics and conspecific cues. Herpetologica. 64:413-421. doi:10.1655/08-020R1.1.
  • Louton J, Gelhaus J, Bouchard R. 1996. The aquatic macrofauna of water-filled bamboo (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Guardea) internodes in a Peruvian tropical lowland forest. Biotropica. 28:228-242. doi:10.2307/2389077.
  • MacCulloch RD, Lathrop A, Kok PJR, Minter LR, Khan SZ, Barrio-Amoros CL. 2008. A new species of Adelophryne (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae) from Guyana, with additional data on A. gutturosa. Zootaxa. 1884:36-50. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1884.1.2.
  • Magnusson WE, Hero JM. 1991. Predation and the evolution of complex oviposition behavior in Amazon rainforest frogs. Oecologia. 86:310-318. doi:10.1007/BF00317595.
  • Maguirre-Jr B. 1971. Phytotelmata: biota and community structure determination in plant-held waters. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 2:439-464. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.02.110171.002255.
  • McDiarmid RW. 1978. Evolution of parental care in frogs. In: Burghardt GM, Bekoff M, editors. The development of behavior. New York: Garland STPM; p. 127-147.
  • Mestre LAM, Aranha JMR, Esper ML. 2001. Macroinvertebrate fauna associated to the bromeliad Vriesea inflate of the Atlantic Forest (Parana State, Southern Brazil). Braz Arch Biol Tech. 44:89-94. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132001000100012.
  • Monteiro FJS. 2005. Bromeliaceas da Serra de Maranguape, CE: riqueza, distribuiCao altitudinal e similaridade em diferentes ambientes. Monography [Bachelor Degree]. Universidade Estadual do Ceara.
  • Oliveira RR. 2004. Importancia das bromelias epifitas na ciclagem de nutrientes da Floresta Atlantica. Acta Bot Bras. 18:793-799. doi:10.1590/S0102-33062004000400009.
  • Peixoto OL. 1995. AssociaCao de anuros a bromeliaceas na Mata Atlantica. Rev Univ Rural. 17:75-83.
  • Pombal-Jr JP. 1999. OviposiCao e desenvolvimento de Brachycephalus ephippium (Spix) (Anura, Brachycephalidae). Rev Bras Zool. 16:967-976. doi:10.1590/S0101-81751999000400004.
  • Pombal-Jr JP, Haddad CFB. 2007. Estrategias e modos reprodutivos em anuros. In: Nascimento LB, Oliveira ME, editors. Herpetologia no Brasil II. Belo Horizonte: Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia; p. 101-116.
  • Prado CPA, Uetanabaro M, Haddad CFB. 2002. Description of a new reproductive mode in Leptodactylus (Anura, Leptodactylidae), with a review of the reproductive specialization toward terrestriality in the genus. Copeia. 4:1128-1133. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2002)002[1128: DOANRM]2.0.CO;2.
  • Richardson BA. 1999. . The bromeliad microcosm and the assessment of faunal diversity in a neotropical forest. Biotropica. 31:321-336. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.1999.tb00144.x.
  • Richardson MK, Carl TF, Hanken J, Elinson RP, Cope C, Bagley P. 1998. Limb development and evolution; a frog embryo with no apical ectodermal ridge (AER). J Anat. 192:379-390. doi:10.1046/ j.1469-7580.1998.19230379.x.
  • Sabagh LT, Ferreira RB, Rocha CFD. 2017. Host bromeliads and their associated frog species: further considerations on the importance of species interactions for conservation. Symbiosis. 73:201-211. doi:10.1007/s13199-017-0500-9.
  • Silva FR, Almeida-Neto M, Prado VHM, Haddad CFB, Rossa-Feres DC. 2012. Humidity levels drive reproductive modes and phyllogenetic diversity of amphibians in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. J Biogeog. 39:1720-1732. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02726.x.
  • Silvano D, Borges-Nojosa DM. 2018. Adelophryne maranguapensis(The IUCN red list of threatened species). [accessed 2004 Mar 2018]. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/56302/11452757.
  • Souza MJN. 2002. Zoneamento ambiental e plano de gestao da APA da Serra de Maranguape-CE. Fortaleza: SEMACE; p. 114.
  • Stebins RC, Cohen NW. 1995. A natural history of amphibians. Princeton: Princeton University Press; p. 316.
  • Taigen TL, Pough FH, Stewart MM. 1984. Water balance of terrestrial anuran (Eleutherodactylus coqui) eggs. Importance of parental care. Ecology. 65:248-255. doi:10.2307/1939477.
  • Todd BD. 2007. Parasites Lost? An overlooked hypothesis for the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies in amphibians. Am Nat. 170:793-799. doi:10.1086/521958.
  • Toledo LF, Garey MV, Costa TRN, LourenCo-de-Moraes R, Hartmann MT, Haddad CFB. 2012. Alternative reproductive modes of Atlantic forest frogs. Jour Ethol. 30:331-336. doi:10.1007/ s10164-011-0322-9.
  • Touchon JC, WarkentinKM. 2008. Reproductive mode plasticity: aquatic and terrestrial oviposition in a treefrog. PNAS. 105:7495-7499. doi:10.1073/pnas.0711579105.
  • Townsend DS, Stewart MM. 1985. Direct development in Eleutherodactylus coqui (Anura: Leptodactylidae), a staging table. Copeia. 2:423-436. doi:10.2307/1444854.
  • Waldemar CC, Irgang BEA. 2003. Ocorrencia do mutualismo facultativo entre Dickia maritima Backer (Bromeliaceae) e o cupim Cortaritermis silvestrii (Holmgren), Nasutitermitinae, em afloramentos rochosos no Parque Estadual de Itapua, Viamao, RS. Acta Bot Bras. 17:37-48. doi:10.1590/S0102- 33062003000100004.
  • Walke JB, Harria RN, Reinert LK, Rollins-Smith LA, Woodhams DC. 2011. Social immunity in amphibians. Evidence of vertical transmission of innate defences. Biotropica. 43:396-400. doi:10.1111/ j.1744-7429.2011.00787.x.
  • Walker ED, Lawson DL, Merritt RW, Morgan WT, Klug MJ. 1991. Nutrient dynamics, bacterial populations, and mosquito productivity in tree hole ecosystems and microcosms. Ecology. 72:1529-1546. doi:10.2307/1940953.
  • Wells KD. 1981. Parental behavior of male and female frogs. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW, editors. Natural selection and social behavior. New York: Chiron Press; p. 184-197.
  • Wells KD. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Xavier AL, Napoli MF. 2011. Contribution of environmental variables to anuran community structure in the Caatinga Domain of Brazil. Phyllomedusa. 10:45-64. doi:10.11606/.2316-9079.v10i1p45-64.