Planned intervention: On Thursday 19/09 between 05:30-06:30 (UTC), Zenodo will be unavailable because of a scheduled upgrade in our storage cluster.
Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published December 31, 2012 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Flock Size Measures Of Migrating Lesser White-Fronted Geese Anser Erythropus

Creators

  • 1. , T , J. & Department of Ecology, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, Hungary
  • 2. and R , L. & Hortobágy National Park Directorate, H-4024 Debrecen, Sumen u. 2, Hungary
  • 3. Ecology Research Group, MTA-ELTE-MTM H-1088 Budapest, Baross u. 13, Hungary, E-mail: lajos.rozsa@gmail.com

Description

Lengyel, Sz., Tar, J., Rózsa, L. (2012): Flock Size Measures Of Migrating Lesser White-Fronted Geese Anser Erythropus. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 58 (3): 297-303, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5735925

Files

source.pdf

Files (493.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:18116a656c4b0d437a420e7ebdd22318
493.2 kB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:18116A656C4B0D437A420E7EFFD22318

Related works

Has part
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5735927 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.5735929 (DOI)

References

  • AARVAK, T., LEINONEN, A., OIEN, I. J. & TOLVANEN, P. (2009) Population size estimation of the Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose based on individual recognition and colour ringing. Pp. 71-75. In: TOLVANEN, P., OIEN, I. J. & RUOKOLAINEN, K. (eds): Conservation of the Lesser White-fronted Goose on the European migration route. Final report of the EU LIFE- Nature project, WWF Finland Report 27 and Norwegian Ornithological Society Report 1-2009, Helsinki.
  • BEAUCHAMP, G. (1998) The effect of group size on mean food intake rate in birds. Biological Reviews 73: 449-472.
  • BEAUCHAMP, G. (2007) Competition in foraging flocks of migrating semipalmated sandpipers. Oecologia 154: 403-409.
  • BEAUCHAMP, G. & RUXTON, G. D. (2008) Disentangling risk dilution and collective detection in the antipredator vigilance of semipalmated sandpipers in flocks.Animal Behaviour 75: 1837-1842.
  • CODLING, E. A., PITCHFORD, J. W. &, SIMPSON, S. D. (2007) Group navigation and the "manywrongs principle" in models of animal movement. Ecology 88: 1864-1870.
  • HAMILTON, W. D. (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd.Journal of Theoretical Biology 31: 295-311.
  • HEDENSTROM, A. & ALERSTAM, T. (1995) Optimal flight speed of birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 348: 471-487.
  • HURLBERT, S. H. (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187-211.
  • IUCN SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION (2006) IUCN 2006 Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland. 191 pp.
  • JARMAN, P. J. (1974) The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 75: 215-268.
  • JOVANI, R. & MAVOR, R. (2011) Group size versus individual group size frequency distributions: a nontrivial distinction. Animal Behaviour 82: 1027-1036.
  • KRAUSE, J. & RUXTON, G. D. (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, New York, 210 pp.
  • LENGYEL, S., TAR, J. & ECSEDI, Z. (2009) Space use and exposure of Lesser White-fronted Geese to hunting in the Hortobagy region (Eastern Hungary). Pp. 53-60. In: TOLVANEN, P., OIEN, I. J. & RUOKOLAINEN, K. (eds): Conservation of the Lesser White-fronted Goose on the European migration route. Final report of the EU LIFE-Nature project, WWF Finland Report 27 and Norwegian Ornithological Society Report 1-2009, Helsinki.
  • LIKER, A. & BOKONY, V. (2009) Larger groups are more successful in innovative problem solving in house sparrows. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 7893-7898.
  • OIEN, I. J., AARVAK, T., EKKER, M. & TOLVANEN, P. (2009) Mapping of migration routes of the Fennoscandian Lesser White-fronted Goose breeding population with profound implications for conservation priorities. Pp. 12-15. In: TOLVANEN, P., OIEN, I. J. & RUOKOLAINEN, K. (eds): Conservation of the Lesser White-fronted Goose on the European migration route. Final report of the EU LIFE-Nature project, WWF Finland Report 27 and Norwegian Ornithological Society Report 1-2009, Helsinki.
  • REICZIGEL, J., LANG, Z., ROZSA, L. & TOTHMERESZ, B. (2008) Measures of sociality: two different views of group size. Animal Behaviour 75: 715-721.
  • REICZIGEL, J. & ROZSA, L. (2006) Flocker 1.1: A software to quantify and compare statistical measures of groups size. Distributed by the authors, http://www.zoologia.hu/flocker/flocker.html [accessed 03 January 2012]
  • REICZIGEL, J., ZAKARIAS, I. & ROZSA, L. (2005) A bootstrap test of stochastic equality of two populations. The American Statistician 59: 156-161.
  • SIMONS, A. M. (2004) Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 453-455.
  • TOLVANEN, P., AARVAK, T. & ANUFRIEV, V. (2009) Lesser White-fronted Goose survey on Kanin Peninsula, Russia, in September 2008. Pp. 40-43. In: TOLVANEN, P., OIEN, I. J. & RUOKO- LAINEN, K. (eds): Conservation of the Lesser White-fronted Goose on the European migration route. Final report of the EU LIFE-Nature project, WWF Finland Report 27 and Norwegian Ornithological Society Report 1-2009, Helsinki.
  • WHITEMAN, N. K. & PARKER, P. G. (2004) Effects of host sociality on ectoparasite population biology. Journal of Parasitology 90: 939-947.