Published September 3, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Detection of latent forms of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection using host biomarker-based ELISAs greatly improves paratuberculosis diagnostic sensitivity

  • 1. Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Deva Gijón, Asturias, Spain
  • 2. Animal Health Department, NEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario, Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
  • 3. Departament of Microbiology and Parasitology, Laboratorio de Sanidad Animal del Principado de Asturias (LSAPA), Gijón, Asturias, Spain
  • 4. Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain
  • 5. Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA), Deva Gijón, Asturias, Spain Department of Animal Health, Facultad de Veterinaria, Instituto Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-ULE), University of León, León, Spain

Description

Bovine paratuberculosis (PTB) is a chronic granulomatous enteritis, caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP), responsible for important economic losses in the dairy industry. Current diagnostic methods have low sensitivities for detection of latent forms of MAP infection, defined by focal granulomatous lesions and scarce humoral response or MAP presence. In contrast, patent infections correspond to multifocal and diffuse types of enteritis where there is increased antibody production, and substantial mycobacterial load. Our previous RNA-Seq analysis allowed the selection of five candidate biomarkers overexpressed in peripheral blood of MAP infected Holstein cows with focal (ABCA13 and MMP8) and diffuse (FAM84A, SPARC and DES) lesions vs. control animals with no detectable PTB-associated lesions in intestine and regional lymph nodes. The aim of the current study was to assess the PTB diagnostic potential of commercial ELISAs designed for the specific detection of these biomarkers. The ability of these ELISAs to identify animals with latent and/or patent forms of MAP infection was investigated using serum from naturally infected cattle (n = 88) and non-infected control animals (n = 67). ROC analysis revealed that the ABCA13-based ELISA showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for the detection of infected animals with focal lesions (AUC 0.837, sensitivity 79.25% and specificity 88.06%) and with any type of histological lesion (AUC 0.793, sensitivity 69.41% and specificity 86.57%) improving on the diagnostic performance of the popular IDEXX ELISA and other conventional diagnostic methods. SPARC and MMP8 showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for the detection of animals with multifocal (AUC 0.852) and diffuse lesions (AUC 0.831), respectively. In conclusion, our results suggest that quantification of ABCA13, SPARC and MMP8 by ELISA has the potential for implementation as a diagnostic tool to reliably identify MAP infection, greatly improving early detection of MAP latent infections when antibody responses and fecal shedding are undetectable using conventional diagnostic methods. © 2020 Blanco Vázquez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Notes

This study was funded by 1) The National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA, www.inia. es/inia/), project code: RTA-2014-00009-C02-02, R.C received this award, 2) The Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MICINN, https://sede.micinn.gob.es/), project code: RTI2018-094192-R-C22, R.C received this award, both projects were co-funded by The European Regional Development Funds (FEDER) and 3) Plan of Science, Technology and Innovation of the Principality of Asturias, Regional funds PCTI 2018?2020 (www.ficyt.es/pcti/), project code: IDI2018-000237), R.C. and F.V. received this award. We acknowledge INIA for the scholarship of Cristina Blanco V?zquez and Maria Canive. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Files

ART00049_PLoS ONE 15(9 September 2020)e0236336.pdf

Files (1.5 MB)

Additional details

References

  • PLoS ONE 15(9 September 2020),e0236336