Published December 31, 2014 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Conicobruchus strangulatus Fahraeus 1839

Description

Conicobruchus strangulatus (Fåhraeus, 1839)

Bruchus strangulatus Fåhraeus, 1839:4

Bruchus hargreavesi Pic, 1933:133, syn. nov. Bruchidius hargreavesi: De Luca, 1965:58 Conicobruchus strangulatus: Decelle, 1951:181 Bruchidius strangulatus Prevett, 1967:176

Material examined. Paratype (female) of Bruchus hargreavesi: Uganda: Kampala, ii.1932, ex pods of Crotalaria [MNHN]

Other material: Burkina-Faso: 1♂, Bobo-Dioulasso, 1.xi.2003, light trap [1♂ 00714] (H. Perrin) [MNHN]. Mali: 2♂, 7♀, Bafing, vi.2008, ex C. cf goreensis [1♂ 0 0 614, specimen GK116 used for DNA extraction] (G.J. Kergoat) [MNHN]. Senegal: 18♂, 13♀, 5km N. Missira, 25.xi.1995, ex C. glaucoides [1♂ 14495, 1♀ 02210] (H. & A. Delobel) [CBGP]; 4♂, 11♀, Nianing, xi.1998, ex C. perrottetii [1♂ 19207, 1♀ 11307] (H. & A. Delobel) [CBGP]; 2♂, 2♀, Dakar, 15.ix.1999, ex C. podocarpa [1♂ 0 2699, specimen Xh1 used for DNA extraction] (H. & A. Delobel) [CBGP]; 1♂, 1♀, 5 km N. Missira, 11.xi.1995, ex C. comosa (H. & A. Delobel) [CBGP]; 1♂, Joal - Samba Dia, 19.xi.1995, ex C. cf goreensis [1♂ 14395] (H. & A. Delobel) [CBGP].

Color variable, with two distinct forms: darker specimens can be entirely black whereas lighter specimens are dark reddish brown, with antennae black. Specimens of the lighter form were formerly considered as a distinct species (hargreavesi).

Other important morphological traits are as follows: pronotum 1.6–1.7 times wider at base than long; lack of white hair spots on pronotum (setation uniformly pale greyish or yellowish); strong ocellate punctation on interstriae, more or less aligned, particularly deep on elytral base in some specimens; hind femur with small acute tooth.

Male genitalia. Median lobe (Fig. 10) of moderate length, stout (maximum width excluding basal hood/ total length = 0.16), strongly widened apically, basal hood moderately widened, concave posteriorly; ventral valve large, subtriangular, with apex acute, bearing numerous sensillae and two lateral groups of 5 to 10 setae; no hinge sclerite; internal sac without central column of tubercles, but with rather dense hyaline scales and tubercles, ending posteriorly in a dorsal mass of small, poorly sclerotized teeth, blending into a short series of well sclerotized teeth of variable length; a pair of strong ventro-lateral dented rods similar to those observed in Conicobruchus nodieri and C. astragalinae, varying in size and shape, from short and straight (Fig 12) to long and crescent (Fig. 13) or rod-shaped (Fig. 14), sometimes very long and articulated (Fig. 15); between these from zero to three isolated teeth; posteriorly a zone with a variable number of strong, isolated sclerotized teeth: absent in specimens from Dakar (Fig. 13) and Bafing (Fig. 15), numerous in male from Missira (Fig. 16); then again two groups of dented sticks or masses, clearly rod-shaped as in Fig. 16 to ill-defined as in male from Nianing (Fig. 17); apical ampoule devoid of any ornamentation, gonopore without sclerotization; basal strut narrow, without keel (Fig. 11); lateral lobes cleft to 85% their length; apex modified, with two lips, the dorsal one bearing about twelve long setae, the ventral one with a dense group of short sensillae.

Biology. Examined material was reared from pods of Crotalaria comosa, C. glaucoides Baker f., C. cf goreensis, C. perrottetii, C. podocarpa. Recorded from other Crotalaria species: C. calycina Schrank, C. leprieurii Guill. & Perr., C. ochroleuca G. D o n, and C. subcapitata De Wild. (Gillon et al., 1992). Crotalaria pods usually contain a large number of small seeds; Conicobruchus strangulatus larvae are external feeders, at least during the last phases of their development, because their body is much larger than the size of individual seeds; when mature, larvae weave a white cocoon inside the inflated pod, attached to its wall, and emergence occurs through a circular hole. Development of young larvae seems impossible in mature, dry seeds.

Distribution. Fåhraeus' types are from Senegal and Republic of South Africa; Pic’s typical series of Bruchus hargreavesi is from Uganda; material seen is from Burkina Faso, Mali, Senegal; also reported from Angola (Decelle, 1975), Congo (Decelle, 1951, 1960, Rasplus, 1989), Eritrea (Zampetti, 1988), Ethiopia (Decelle 1971), Ivory Coast (Rasplus, 1989; Gillon et al., 1992), Nigeria (Prevett, 1971), Senegal (Decelle, 1969) and Togo (Woegan et al., 1997).

Discussion. Conicobruchus strangulatus cannot be confounded with the three species that have a red last visible tergite (C. atrosuturalis, C. decoratus, C. rubricollis). Differences in elytral setation easily separate C. strangulatus from C. cicatricosus (uniform in C. strangulatus, mix of bare spots and densely setose patches in C. cicatricosus). Finally it can be distinguished from C. flabellicornis based on the presence of brushes and spots of dense white setae on the pronotum (absent in C. strangulatus, present in C. flabellicornis).

Conicobruchus strangulatus is the type species of genus Conicobruchus Decelle. Senegalese specimens are either of the lighter (hargreavesi) or of the darker (strangulatus) form. The fact that specimens of both forms emerged from pods of the same host-plant in the same location provides support to establish the synonymy Bruchus hargreavesi Pic = Conicobruchus strangulatus (Fåhraeus).

Phylogenetic analyses. Maximum likelihood analyses yield a best ML tree with a likelihood score of - 25368.23 (Fig. 18). The genus Conicobruchus is recovered monophyletic with a high support (BV of 97%). As in the study of Kergoat et al. (2011), Bruchidius biguttatus and B. cisti appear closely related to the genus Conicobruchus (BV of 93%). Within the genus Conicobruchus the relationships are very similar to those inferred in Kergoat et al. (2011). The six species corresponding to the Conicobruchus strangulatus species group cluster together, with a high bootstrap support (BV of 94%). The newly sequenced species Conicobruchus indicus is found sister to C. kidevuensis, and appear unrelated to the species of the C. strangulatus species group. Another newly sequenced species, C. medaniensis is found sister to C. albopubens with a high support (BV of 100%). Within the C. strangulatus species group a clade composed of C. decoratus and C. rubricollis is sister (BV of 94%) to a wellsupported (BV of 89%) clade of four species. The latter is encompasses C. cicatricosus on the one hand and a subclade that groups C. flabellicornis sister to C. atrosuturalis and C. strangulatus on the other.

Notes

Published as part of Le Ru, Bruno P., Delobel, Alex, György, Zoltán, Genson, Gwenaëlle & Kergoat, Gael J., 2014, Taxonomy, host-plant associations and phylogeny of African Crotalaria - feeding seed beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae): the Conicobruchus strangulatus (Fåhraeus) species group, pp. 238-256 in Zootaxa 3895 (2) on pages 249-253, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3895.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/226173

Files

Files (7.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:349448f846fe6fbd773dbe97fc226c95
7.6 kB Download

System files (49.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:56589f1f1791ea1f078ac179589d03e5
49.5 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

References

  • Fahraeus, O. I. (1839) In: Schonherr, C. J. (Ed.), Genera et species Curculionidum, cum synonymia hujus, familiae. Roret, Paris, Fleischer, Stockholm, pp. 1 - 495.
  • Pic, M. (1933) Nouveautes diverses. Melanges exotico-entomologiques, 61, 3 - 36.
  • De Luca, Y. (1965) Catalogue de metazoaires parasites et predateurs de Bruchides (Coleopteres). Journal of Stored Products Research, 1, 51 - 98. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / 0022 - 474 X (65) 90007 - X
  • Decelle, J. (1951) Contribution a l'etude des Bruchidae du Congo Belge (Col. Phytophaga). Revue de zoologie et de botanique africaines, 45, 172 - 192.
  • Prevett, P. F. (1967) Observations on the biology of six species of Bruchidae (Coleoptera) in northern Nigeria. Entomologist's. Monthly Magazine, 102, 174 - 180.
  • Gillon, Y., Rasplus, J. - Y. & Boughad, A. - M. (1992) Utilisation des graines de Legumineuses par un peuplement de Bruchidae et d'Anthribidae en zone de mosaique foret-savane (Lamto: Cote d'Ivoire). Journal of African Zoology, 106, 421 - 443.
  • Decelle, J. (1975) Les Coleopteres Bruchides d'Angola. Publicacoes Culturais Cia Diamantes Angola, 89, 13 - 32.
  • Decelle, J. (1960) Bruchidae (Coleoptera: Phytophagoidea). Exploration du parc National de l'Upemba I. Mission G. F. de Witte), 59, 135 - 143. [1946 - 1949]
  • Rasplus, J. - Y. (1989) Revision des especes afro-tropicales du genre Dinarmus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France (N. S.), 25, 135 - 162.
  • Zampetti, M. F. (1988) Notes on bruchids from East Africa Coleoptera, Bruchidae. Fragmenta Entomologica, 21, 101 - 110.
  • Decelle, J. (1971) Bruchides (Col.) recoltes en Abyssinie Centrale par l'expedition H. Scott et J. Omer Cooper (Sept 1926 - Jan 1927). Bulletin et Annales de la Societe Royale Entomologique de Belgique, 107, 243 - 259.
  • Prevett, P. F. (1971) The larvae of some Nigerian Bruchidae (Coleoptera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 123, 247 - 312. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 2311.1971. tb 00845. x
  • Decelle, J. (1969) Le Parc National du Niokolo-kobo (Senegal). Part III. XVII. Coleoptera: Bruchidae. Memoires de l'Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire, 84, 287 - 296.
  • Woegan, A. Y., Glitho, A. I., Bouchet, F. & Akpagana, K. (1997) Contribution au recensement de quelques legumineuses spontanees et subspontanees, hotes de Bruchidae en zone guineenne au Togo (Coleoptera, Chrysomeloidea). Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de France, 3, 241 - 250.
  • Kergoat, G. J., Le Ru, B. P., Genson, G., Cruaud, C., Couloux, A. & Delobel, A. (2011) Phylogenetics, species boundaries and timing of resource tracking in a highly specialized group of seed beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 59, 746 - 760. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1016 / j. ympev. 2011.03.014