Published December 31, 2017 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Eumicrotremus Gill 1862

Description

Genus Eumicrotremus Gill, 1862b

Eumicrotremus Gill, 1862b: 330 (type species: Cyclopterus spinosus Fabricius, 1776).

Cyclopteroides Garman, 1892: 37 (type species: Cyclopteroides gyrinops Garman, 1892).

Lethotremus Gilbert, 1896: 449 (type species: Cyclolumpus muticus Gilbert, 1896).

Cyclolumpus Tanaka, 1912: 86 (type species: Cyclopteropsis asperrimus Tanaka, 1912).

Cyclopteropsis Soldatov & Popov, 1929: 240 (type species: Eumicrotremus bergi Popov, 1929). Cyclopterocottus Popov, 1930: 74 (type species: Eumicrotremus brashnikowi Schmidt, 1904).

Microancanthus Voskoboinikova, 2015: 217 (type species: Microancanthus tokranovi Voskoboinikova, 2015). Georgimarinus Voskoboinikova & Nazarkin, 2015: 630 (type species: Cyclopteropsis barbatus Lindberg & Legeza, 1955).

Diagnosis. Head and body lacking tentacles; some species with bony elements on head and body; one or two foramina present on anterodorsal portion of prootic; mesial process of hyomandibula receiving adductor hyomandibulae; first dorsal fin visible; end of gill slit situated above level of base of uppermost pectoral fin ray.

Remarks. The synonymy of Cyclopteropsis Soldatov & Popov, 1929, Eumicrotremus Gill, 1862b, Lethotremus Gilbert, 1896, and Georgimarinus Voskoboinikova & Nazarkin, 2015 is proposed here on the basis of inferred phylogenetic relationships (see “Ranking at subfamilial and generic levels”). Microancathus Voskoboinikova, 2015 is also regarded to be a junior synonym of Eumicrotremus owing to comparison of description of the type species of the former and synapomorphies supporting cyclopterid clades inferred here. The name Eumicrotremus is considered the valid name for the genus, having priority over the others. As redefined, Eumicrotremus is distinguished from the other three valid genera in having a visible first dorsal fin, and lacking tentacles on the head and body.

Tanaka (1912) established the genus Cyclolumpus for Eumicrotremus asperrimus, although it has since been regarded as a junior synonym of Eumicrotremus (Lindberg & Legeza, 1955). The present phylogenetic analysis included E. asperrimus in clade B2, which included all examined Eumicrotremus (and Lethotremus). Accordingly, Cyclolumpus is treated as a junior synonym of Eumicrotremus, following previous studies.

Garman (1892) established the genus Cyclopteroides based on Eumicrotremus gyrinops Garman, 1892. However, this genus was also regarded as a junior synonym of Eumicrotremus by Lindberg & Legeza (1955). Garman’s (1892) original description of E. gryinops included: “Skin covered with mucus, with four series of very small, distant, one to eight spined tubercles on each side”, a description closely in agreement with a diagnostic character of Eumicrotremus [head and body (or body only) having some or many tubercles] as redefined here. In addition, although E. gyrinops was not included in the phylogenetic analysis, it was confirmed by examination of a single specimen during this study that the species has many small tubercles on the body. Therefore, the genus Cyclopteroides is treated as a junior synonym of Eumicrotremus, following previous studies.

The genus Cyclopterocottus was established by Popov (1930) for Eumicrotremus brashnikowi Schmidt, 1904, although it has become regarded as a junior synonym of Cyclopteropsis (e.g., Ueno, 1970; Mecklenburg & Sheiko, 2003; Nelson, 2006; this study). Lindberg & Legeza (1955) described E. brashnikowi as having “Spinous plates having cover side of body, nap, region of cheek”, also closely in agreement with a diagnostic character of Eumicrotremus (see above). Although E. brashnikowi was not examined during the present study, the genus Cyclopterocottus is treated as a junior synonym of Eumicrotremus.

Voskoboinikova (2015) established the genus Microancanthus for M. tokranovi Voskoboinikova, 2015 (type species) and Eumicrotremus fedorovi Mandrytsa, 1991, being characterized from other cyclopterids by the following unique characters: a single pore on the infraorbital sensory canal; flat or hemispherical tubercles (as bony plaques) on the body, with numerous small spines; the opercle with a conspicuous notch on its posterior edge; and an S-sharped subopercle. However, although the above species were not available for examination during the present study, M. tokranovi, at least, has sensory tubes on the lower jaw (Voskoboinikova, 2015: fig. 5B), which supports the monophyly of clade G5 (including E. orbis, E. spinosus, “ Lethotremusawae and “ L.” muticus) (autapomorphic character 32-1), as recognized in this study. Accordingly, recognition of Microancanthus must result in Eumicrotremus being paraphyletic. Therefore, Microancanthus cannot be recognized from a cladistic perspective and is synonymized under Eumicrotremus in this study, although the monophyly of E. tokranovi and E. fedorovi is supportable based on the above mentioned autapomorphies.

Voskoboinikova & Nazarkin (2015) established the genus Georgimarinus for Eumicrotremus barbatus (Lindberg & Legeza, 1955). They considered that the genus is characterized by unique derived characters: i.e., teeth in the outer row at the symphysis of the premaxilla fused with the premaxilla; teeth at the symphysis of the dentary fused among themselves and with dentary and forming the regular cutting edge; numerous barbs present on the head and body; and the bony plaques located in centers of connective tissue tubercles leaving the edges free. The present study examined this species and also found anterior teeth on the premaxilla and dentary fused with each other and the supporting bones, and these characters were recognized as autapomorphies of the species. However, E. barbatus was inferred to be deeply nested within clade D2 including Eumicrotremus and Cyclopleropsis, and the former genus becomes paraphyletic if Georgimarinus is regraded as valid. Therefore, following the cladistic methodology, the present study synonymizes Georgimarinus under Eumicrotremus.

The genus Eumicrotremus includes the following 25 valid species, seven and two species, respectively, having been previously included in Cyclopteropsis and Lethotremus: Eumicrotremus andriashevi Perminov, 1936, Eumicrotremus awae (Jordan & Snyder, 1902), Eumicrotremus asperrimus (Tanaka, 1912), Eumicrotremus barbatus (Lindberg & Legeza, 1955), Eumicrotremus bergi (Popov, 1929), Eumicrotremus brashnikowi (Schmidt, 1904), Eumicrotremus derjugini Popov, 1926, Eumicrotremus fedorovi Mandrytsa, 1991, Eumicrotremus gyrinops (Garman, 1892), Eumicrotremus inarmatus (Mednikov & Prokhorov, 1956), Eumicrotremus jordani (Soldatov, 1929), Eumicrotremus lindbergi (Soldatov, 1930), Eumicrotremus mcalpini (Fowler, 1914), Eumicrotremus muticus (Gilbert, 1896), Eumicrotremus orbis (Günther, 1861), Eumicrotremus pacificus Schmidt, 1904, Eumicrotremus popovi (Soldatov, 1929), Eumicrotremus phrynoides Gilbert & Burke, 1912, Eumicrotremus schmidti Lindberg & Legeza, 1955, Eumicrotremus soldatovi Popov, 1936, Eumicrotremus spinosus (Fabricius, 1776), Eumicrotremus taranetzi Perminov, 1936, Eumicrotremus tartaricus Lindberg & Legeza, 1955, Eumicrotremus terraenovae Myers & Böhlke, 1950 and Eumicrotremus tokranovi (Voskoboinikova, 2015) (see Lindberg & Legeza, 1955; Ueno, 1970; Parin et al., 2002; Mecklenburg & Sheiko, 2003).

Notes

Published as part of Oku, Kanami, Imamura, Hisashi & Yabe, Mamoru, 2017, Phylogenetic relationships and a new classification of the family Cyclopteridae (Perciformes: Cottoidei), pp. 1-59 in Zootaxa 4221 (1) on pages 54-55, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.246721

Files

Files (8.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:52910cf1aa83a77e42ec52c14c0d4e68
8.6 kB Download

System files (54.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2a7c81f3bbce0fc573c7ab58b642b632
54.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Cyclopteridae
Genus
Eumicrotremus
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Scorpaeniformes
Phylum
Chordata
Scientific name authorship
Gill
Taxon rank
genus
Taxonomic concept label
Eumicrotremus Gill, 1862 sec. Oku, Imamura & Yabe, 2017

References

  • Gill, T. N. (1862 b) Note on some genera of fishes of western North America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 14, 329 - 332.
  • Garman, S. (1892) The Discoboli (Cyclopteridae, Liparopsidae and Liparididae). Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 14, 1 - 96, pls. 1 - 13.
  • Tanaka, S. (1912) XXXVIII. Cyclolumpus asperrimus, n. g. n. sp. (Cyclopteridae). Figures and Descriptions of the Fishes of Japan, Including the Riukiu Islands, Bonin Islands, Formosa, Kurile Islands, Korea and Southern Sakhalin, 5, 86 - 87.
  • Soldatov, V. & Popov, A. (1929) On the new genus Cyclopteropsis (Pisces, Cyclopteridae) from the Okhotsk Sea. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Ser. A, 1929, 239 - 242.
  • Popov, A. M. (1930) A short review of the fishes of the family Cyclopteridae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 10, 6, 69 - 76.
  • Schmidt, P. J. (1904) Fishes of the eastern seas of the Russian Empire. Scientific results of the Korea-Sakhalin Expedition of the Emperor Russian Geographical Society 1900 - 1901. Fishes of the eastern seas of the Russian Empire, Saint Petersburg, xi + 466 pp., 6 pls. [in Russian]
  • Voskoboinikova, O. S. & Nazarkin, M. V. (2015) Georgimarinus gen. nov. - a new genus of the family Cyclopteridae (Cottoidei). Journal of Ichthyology, 55, 630 - 635.
  • Lindberg, G. U. & Legeza, M. I. (1955) A review of the genera and species of the subfamily Cyclopterinae (Pisces). Bulletin of the Zoological Institute Academy of Science, 18, 389 - 458, figs. 1 - 33. [in Russian, Ueno, T. translated in English]
  • Ueno, T. (1970) Fauna Japonica, Cyclopteridae (Pisces). Academic Press of Japan, Tokyo, 233 pp., 13 pls.
  • Mecklenburg, C. W. & Sheiko, B. A. (2003) Family Cyclopteridae Bonaparte 1831 - lumpsuckers. California Academy of Sciences Annotated Checklists of Fishes, 6, 1 - 17.
  • Nelson, J. S. (2006) Fishes of the world, 4 th edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, xix + 601 pp.
  • Mandrytsa, S. A. (1991) New species of the genus Eumicrotremus (Pisces, Cyclopteridae) from the Sea of Okhotsk. Zoological Zhurnal, 70, 148 - 151. [in Russian, with English summary]
  • Perminov, G. N. (1936) A review of the species of the genus Eumicrotremus Gill. Bulletin of the Far Eastern Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 19. [in Russian, English summary]
  • Jordan, D. S. & Snyder, J. O. (1902) A review of the discobolous fishes of Japan. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 24, 343 - 351.
  • Popov, A. M. (1926) On ichthyology of the Kara and adjacent Barents seas. Travauz de ls Societe des naturalistes de Leningrad, 56, 27 - 55. [in Russian]
  • Mednikov, B. M. & Prokhorov, V. G. (1956) A new species of Cyclopteropsis (Pisces, Cyclopterinae) from the Bering Sea. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, Ser. A, Leningrad, 111, 717 - 719.
  • Soldatov, V. K. & Lindberg, G. U. (1930) A review of the fishes of the seas of the Far East. Bulletins of the Pacific Science Institute, 5, i - xlvii, 1 - 576, pls. 1 - 15. [in Russian, with English summary, and new taxa also in English]
  • Fowler, H. W. (1914) Fishes collected by the Peary Relief Expedition of 1899. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 66, 359 - 366.
  • Gunther, A. (1861) Catalogue of the fishes in the British Museum. Catalogue of the acanthopterygian fishes in the collection of the British Museum. Gobiidae, Discoboli, Pediculati, Blenniidae, Labyrinthici, Mugilidae, Notacanthi. Order of the trustees, London, xxv + 586 + x pp.
  • Gilbert, C. H. & Burke, C. V. (1912) Fishes from Bering Sea and Kamchatka. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries, 30, 31 - 96.
  • Myers, G. S. & Bohlke, J. E. (1950) A new lump-sucker of the genus Eumicrotremus from the northwestern Atlantic. Stanford Ichthyological Bulletin, 3, 199 - 202.
  • Parin, N. V., Fedorov, V. V. & Sheiko B. A. (2002) An annotated catalogue of fish-like vertebrates and fishes of the seas of Russia and adjacent countries. Part 2. Order Scorpaeniformes. Journal of Ichthyology, 42 (Supplement 1), S 60 - S 135.