Published September 30, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Emergence of an Innovation-Driven Economy in the Regions of the Russian Federation in 2010-2019: Identifying Key Evaluation Criteria and Region Rankings

Description

Introduction. The purpose of the study is to analyse the level of Russia's science and technology system and to determine the country's placein the international rankings by comparing the performance metrics achieved so far with the showings of the world's leading S&T powers, followed by the appropriate managerial decision-making in the areas requiring the government's immediate attention. Methods. The research tools employed are statistical data grouping, comparative analysis and the formal logical methods. Results and Discussion. Since 2014, various factors (namely foreign policy and economic factors, geopolitical situation, oil market volatility and instability of the national currency) have acted as catalysts of crisis in the national economy, leading to a decline in Russia's international rankings. Following a degree of adaptation to the external changes and a partial economic recovery by 2018-2020, Russia's position has levelled off, but the pre-crisis levels have yet to be achieved. The results of the survey show an overall positive dynamic, with the most significant progress observable in the rankings that characterise competitiveness of the national economy. Conclusion. The findings of the study have practical relevance and can be used to adjust the national policy on scientific and technological development

Notes

For citation: Netrebin YuYu, Medvedev VV. Emergence of an Innovation-Driven Economy in the Regions of the Russian Federation in 2010-2019: Identifying Key Evaluation Criteria and Region Rankings. Science Governance and Scientometrics. 2021;16(3):336-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33873/2686-6706.2021.16-3.336-369

Files

Emergence of an Innovation-Driven Economy. Netrebin, Medvedev. 2021-3.pdf

Additional details

References

  • Narula R, Jormanainen I. When a Good Science Base is Not Enough to Create Competitive Industries: Lock-in and Inertia in Russian Systems of Innovation. SLPTMD Working Paper Series. 2008;022:1-46. Available at: https://www.oxfordtmcd.org/sites/default/files/SLPTMDWP-022.pdf (accessed: 08.07.2021).
  • Gianella C, Tompson W. Stimulating Innovation in Russia: The Role of Institutions and Policies. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. 2007;539:1-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/324526053041
  • Crescenzi R, Jaax A. Innovation in Russia: The Territorial Dimension. Economic Geography. 2016;93(1):66-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00 130095.2016.1208532
  • Monakhov IA. Indicators and Indices of Innovation Activity of Countries and Territories: International Experience. Vestnic TVGU. Series "Economics and Management". 2014;3:35-49. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/ download/pdf/74272056.pdf (accessed: 16.07.2021). (In Russ.)
  • Zemtsov SP, Baburin VL. Modeling of Diffusion of Innovation and Typology of Russian Regions: a Case Study of Cellular Communication. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2017;4:17-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S0373244417100024 (In Russ.)
  • Zemtsov SP, Barinova VA. The Paradigm Changing of Regional Innovation Policy in Russia: from Equalization to Smart Specialization. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2016;10:65-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042- 8736-2016-10-65-81 (In Russ.)
  • Baburin VL, Zemtsov SP. Factors of Patent Activity in Russian Regions. World of Economics and Management. 2016;16(1):86-100. Available at: https://www.iep.ru/files/persona/zemtsov/Baburin.V.L.,_Zemcov.S.P.-Faktory-patentnoj-aktivnosti-v-regionah-Rossii.pdf (accessed: 16.07.2021).
  • Zemtsov SP, Baburin VL. How to Assess an Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems in Russia? Innovations. 2017;2:60-66. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kak-otsenit-effektivnost-regionalnyh-innovatsionnyh-sistem-v-rossii (accessed: 16.07.2021).
  • Bortnik IM, Zinov VG, Kotsubinskiy VA, Sorokina AV. Indicators of Innovative Development of Russian Regions for the Purposes of Monitoring and Control. Innovations. 2013;11:21-32. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/indikatory-innovatsionnogo-razvitiya-regionov-rossii-dlya-tseley-monitoringa-i-upravleniya (accessed: 16.07.2021).
  • Bortnik IM, Senchenya GI, Mikheeva NN, Zdunov AA, Kadochnicov PA, Sorokina AV. A System of Measurement and Monitoring Innovative Activity in Russian Regions. Innovations. 2012;9:25-38. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sistema-otsenki-i-monitoringa-innovatsionnogo-razvitiya-regionov-rossii (accessed: 16.07.2021).
  • Bortnik IM, Sorokina AV. Recommendations to AIRR Regions Based on Analysis of Ratings of Innovative Regions. Innovations. 2014;7:59-68. Available at: https://maginnov.ru/assets/files/volumes/2014.07/reko mendacii-regionam-airr-po-rezultatam-rejtingov-innovacionnyh-regionov.pdf (accessed: 16.07.2021).
  • Bortnik IM, Zinov VG, Kotsubinskiy VA, Sorokina AV. Questions the Reliability of Statistical Information on Innovation Activities in Russia. Innovations. 2013;10:10-17. Available at: https://maginnov.ru/ assets/files/volumes/2013.10/voprosy-dostovernosti-statisticheskoj-informacii-ob-innovacionnoj-deyatelnosti-v-rossii.pdf (accessed: 16.07.2021).
  • Zhikhareva AK. Possible Problems with the Use of Regional Ratings. Administrative consulting. 2019;10:49-60. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vozmozhnye-problemy-primeneniya-regionalnyh-reytingov (accessed: 16.07.2021).
  • Zhikhareva AK. Innovative Ratings of Russian Regions: Methodological Features of Their Formation and Practice of Application. The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020;2:121-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2073-6487-2020- 10020 (In Russ.)
  • Zavarykina LV, Lopatina AS, Perfilieva OV. Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Institutions International Ranking Methodologies. International Organisations Research Journal. 2012;7(1):70-121. Available at: https://iorj.hse.ru/data/2012/03/06/1266426678/4.pdf (accessed: 16.07.2021).
  • Netrebin YuYu, Uulyakina NA, Vershinin IV, Burdakova AE. Scientific, Technological and Innovative Capacity of the Region: Comparison of Current Approaches to Evaluation. Ekonomika i Upravlenie: Problemy, Resheniya. 2020;1(10):107-116. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=44201479 (accessed: 16.07.2021).
  • Godin B. The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2006;31(6):639-667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906291865
  • Vershinin I. Disadvantages of Patent Performance Indicators in Performance-Based Research Funding Systems. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration. 2021;29(2):1341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46585/sp29021341
  • Johnson B. Cities, Systems of Innovation and Economic Development. Innovation. 2008;10(2-3):146-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/ impp.453.10.2-3.146
  • Medvedev VV. Criteria and Indicators of Balanced Socio-Economic and Scientific-Technological Development of Regions and Their Municipalities. Priority Directions of Innovation Activity in Industry : Collection of Scientific Articles on the Results of X International Scientific Conference. 2020;164–168.
  • Oughton C, Landabaso M, Morgan K. The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2002;27:97-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013104805703