Who are the women who enrolled in the POSITIVE trial: A global studyto support young hormone receptor positive breast cancer survivorsdesiring pregnancy
Creators
- Partridge Ann H1
- Niman Samuel M2
- Ruggeri Monica3
- Peccatori Fedro4
- Azim Jr. Hatem A.5
- Colleoni Marco6
- Saura Cristina7
- Shimizu Chikako8
- Saetersdal Anna Barbo9
- Kroep Judith R10
- Mailliez Audrey11
- Warner Ellen12
- Borges Virginia13
- Amant Frederic14
- Gombos Andrea15
- Kataoka Akemi16
- Rousset-Jablonski Christine17
- Bornstar Simona18
- Takei Junko19
- Lee Jeon Eon20
- Walshe Janice M21
- Ruiz Borrego Manuel22
- Moore Halle CF23
- Saunders Christobel24
- Cardoso Fatima25
- Susnjar Snezana26
- Bjelic-Radisic27
- Smith Karen L28
- Piccart Martine15
- Korde Larrisa A.29
- Goldrisch Aron30
- Gelber Richard D31
- Pagani Olivia32
- 1. Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- 2. International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Department of Data Science, Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- 3. International Breast Cancer Study Group, Program for Young Patients, Coordinating Center, Effingerstrasse 40, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
- 4. Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, 20141, Italy
- 5. Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, School of Medicine, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Av. Batallon de San Patricio 112, San Pedro Garza Garcia, 66278, Mexico
- 6. International Breast Cancer Study Group, Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- 7. Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Medical Oncology Service, Barcelona, Spain
- 8. Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 1-21-1, Japan
- 9. Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- 10. Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- 11. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
- 12. Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Canada
- 13. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
- 14. Department of Oncology, KU Leuven and Leuven Cancer Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 15. Institut Jules Bordet and L'Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- 16. Breast Oncology Cancer, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
- 17. Leon Berard Cancer Centre, Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Surgery, Lyon, France
- 18. Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- 19. St Luke's International Hospital, Breast Center, Tokyo, Japan
- 20. Breast Division, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Research and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
- 21. Cancer Trials Ireland and Medical Oncology Department, St. Vincent's University Hospital and Tallaght University Hosptial, Dublin, Ireland
- 22. Hospital Virgen del Rocio Sevilla, GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer Group, Sevilla, Spain
- 23. Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
- 24. Division of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- 25. Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- 26. Department of Medical Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
- 27. Breast Unit, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany ; Medical University Graz, Department Gynaecology, Graz, Austria
- 28. Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
- 29. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
- 30. International Breast Cancer Study Group, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- 31. International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Department of Data Science, Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- 32. Interdisciplinary Cancer Service Hospital Riviera-Chablais Rennaz, Geneva University Hospitals, Lugano University, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Vaud, Switzerland
Description
Background. Premenopausal women with early hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer receive 5–10 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) during which pregnancy is contraindicated and fertility may wane. The POSITIVE study investigates the impact of temporary ET interruption to allow pregnancy.
Methods.POSITIVE enrolled women with stage I-III HR + early breast cancer, ≤42 years, who had received 18–30 months of adjuvant ET and wished to interrupt ET for pregnancy. Treatment interruption for up to 2 years was permitted to allow pregnancy, delivery and breastfeeding, followed by ET resumption to complete the planned duration.
Findings. From 12/2014 to 12/2019, 518 women were enrolled at 116 institutions/20 countries/4 continents. At enrolment, the median age was 37 years and 74.9 % were nulliparous. Fertility preservation was used by 51.5 % of women. 93.2 % of patients had stage I/II disease, 66.0 % were node-negative, 54.7 % had breast conserving surgery, 61.9 % had received neo/adjuvant chemotherapy. Tamoxifen alone was the most prescribed ET (41.8 %), followed by tamoxifen + ovarian function suppression (OFS) (35.4 %). A greater proportion of North American women were <35 years at enrolment (42.7 %), had mastectomy (59.0 %) and received tamoxifen alone (59.8 %). More Asian women were nulliparous (81.0 %), had node-negative disease (76.2%) and received tamoxifen + OFS (56.0 %). More European women had received chemotherapy (69.3 %).
Interpretation.The characteristics of participants in the POSITIVE study provide insights to which patients and doctors considered it acceptable to interrupt ET to pursue pregnancy. Similarities and variations from a regional, sociodemographic, disease and treatment standpoint suggest specific sociocultural attitudes across the world.
Notes
Files
Who are the women who enrolled inm the POSITIVE trial...pdf
Files
(526.0 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:f19fa0fe377e9974171ded3437c92816
|
526.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is derived from
- http://www.elsevier.com/brst (URL)
- Is part of
- 0960-9776 (ISSN)