Published July 19, 2019 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Ophiocten centobi Paterson et al. 1982

Description

Ophiocten centobi Paterson et al., 1982 Reports for the Azores:

Ophiocten centobi Paterson et al., 1982 — $ St̂hr & Segonzac 2005: 286, 394–395.

Type locality: Bay of Biscay (47°44’N, 08°21’W).

See: Paterson et al. (1982: 119–121, figs. 6–7); St̂hr & Segonzac (2005).

Occurrence: known only from the Bay of Biscay (Paterson et al. 1982) and in the vicinity of the deep-water hydrothermal systems on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge south of the Azores, such as Lucky Strike and Rainbow (St̂hr & Segonzac 2005).

Depth: 1,680–2,837 m (AZO; St̂hr & Segonzac 2005).

Habitat: coral and gravel detritic substrates (non-vent environments); also among mytilid bivalves, pteropod shells and Cynachira sponges (St̂hr & Segonzac 2005).

Remarks: Ophiocten centobi was only known from the type material from the Bay of Biscay until St̂hr & Segonzac (2005) reported it from the vicinity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent fields in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, south of the Azores.

Notes

Published as part of Madeira, Patrícia, Kroh, Andreas, Cordeiro, Ricardo, De, António M., Martins, Frias & Ávila, Sérgio P., 2019, The Echinoderm Fauna of the Azores (NE Atlantic Ocean), pp. 1-231 in Zootaxa 4639 (1) on page 51, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4639.1, http://zenodo.org/record/3342161

Files

Files (1.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2937dd4a35515938a38ccc2d11aa85f4
1.5 kB Download

System files (13.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ab33a5589889601e28fae4f582115dca
13.8 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

References

  • Paterson, G. L. J., Tyler, P. A. & Gage, J. D. (1982) The taxonomy and zoogeography of the genus Ophiocten (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) in the North Atlantic Ocean. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology, 43 (3), 109 - 128.
  • St ˆ hr, S. & Segonzac, M. (2005) Deep-sea ophiuroids (Echinodermata) from reducing and non-reducing environments in the North Atlantic Ocean. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 85 (2), 383 - 402. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0025315405011318 h