Ophiocten centobi Paterson et al. 1982
Description
Ophiocten centobi Paterson et al., 1982 Reports for the Azores:
Ophiocten centobi Paterson et al., 1982 — $ St̂hr & Segonzac 2005: 286, 394–395.
Type locality: Bay of Biscay (47°44’N, 08°21’W).
See: Paterson et al. (1982: 119–121, figs. 6–7); St̂hr & Segonzac (2005).
Occurrence: known only from the Bay of Biscay (Paterson et al. 1982) and in the vicinity of the deep-water hydrothermal systems on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge south of the Azores, such as Lucky Strike and Rainbow (St̂hr & Segonzac 2005).
Depth: 1,680–2,837 m (AZO; St̂hr & Segonzac 2005).
Habitat: coral and gravel detritic substrates (non-vent environments); also among mytilid bivalves, pteropod shells and Cynachira sponges (St̂hr & Segonzac 2005).
Remarks: Ophiocten centobi was only known from the type material from the Bay of Biscay until St̂hr & Segonzac (2005) reported it from the vicinity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent fields in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, south of the Azores.
Notes
Files
Files
(1.5 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:2937dd4a35515938a38ccc2d11aa85f4
|
1.5 kB | Download |
System files
(13.8 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:ab33a5589889601e28fae4f582115dca
|
13.8 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Collection code
- AZO
- Family
- Ophiuridae
- Genus
- Ophiocten
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Order
- Ophiurida
- Phylum
- Echinodermata
- Species
- centobi
- Taxon rank
- species
- Type status
- holotype
- Taxonomic concept label
- Ophiocten centobi et, 1982 sec. Madeira, Kroh, Cordeiro, De, Martins & Ávila, 2019
References
- Paterson, G. L. J., Tyler, P. A. & Gage, J. D. (1982) The taxonomy and zoogeography of the genus Ophiocten (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) in the North Atlantic Ocean. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology, 43 (3), 109 - 128.
- St ˆ hr, S. & Segonzac, M. (2005) Deep-sea ophiuroids (Echinodermata) from reducing and non-reducing environments in the North Atlantic Ocean. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 85 (2), 383 - 402. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0025315405011318 h